Mini 1005: Mafiaphobes! (Game over)
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
1) Are you scum?
No! Gosh, so rude.
2) What's the role you prefer to play (nothing to uncommon please), which role do you prefer between townie and scum?
I'm honestly pretty unfamiliar with roles. This is only my second game haha. I prefer PR's (especially kinda crazy ones) but I just like playing, mostly.
3) What role you hate having in the setup/play against (nothing uncommon please)?
None of the ones I've encountered so far haha.
4) What do you think about bandwagons in early game, what in late game?
In early game, they're somewhat unavoidable. During RVS, unintentional or joking bandwagons are going to happen, providing discussion fodder. As the game gets serious, though, I find bandwagons to be scummy. They remove independent thought.
5) How would you characterize your playing style?
I don't really have a solidified style just yet.
6) What do you think about RVS?
It's a good way to get things going. RQS can be more effective sometimes.
7) How do you hope to find scum?
Questioning and analyzing play, I suppose.
[quote = "vezokpiraka"]
I'll answer 6 only.
Usually people who want to end RVS by not saying "End the RVS" are scum.
Asking subtle question to end RVS = scum in my experience.
[/quote]
He did mention before the questions that he was attempting to cut RVS short. I don't feel like he was being subtle at all.
Also, discussion == town, especially in early stages.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
I'm pretty neutral on this issue of Tasky's questions. I personally think that questions can really help get a game going (as they have). All this contention about Tasky's 2nd and 3rd questions, I feel, may be suited to a not-in-game setting; I don't think Tasky did anything scummy, or even anti-town. As I believe has been said, any information gathered from those questions is backed up by very WIFOM-y reasoning. I can understand the points being made against it, but I don't think it's that big of a deal.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
xvart, while I can see where diddin might be seen as scummy for that comment, I don't fully agree. Also, the underlined sentence? That is an enormous logical fallacy. What he was saying was "look, what I was trying to do was accomplished, even if it wasn't by my hand." That, by no means, equates to "look, what I was trying to do was accomplished BECAUSE I SCREWED UP."xvart wrote:
But you are claiming some responsibility; so show me where the conversation occurred about bandwagoning or the person you bandwagoned occurred.diddin wrote: I'm not claiming sole responsibility for ending RVS, I'm just saying that my usual plan for getting out of RVS worked, regardless of because what I did or not.AND, you then say your plan for getting out of RVS worked, whether you did it or not; so logically, you are saying because what I did failed, we still got out of RVS.The fact that you are trying to take credit for something to gain town points is highly suspicious. Care to link to games where you enacted your usual plan?
Plus, your vote on Tasky was extremely opportunistic.
Don't try to push suspicion on people for pretty much nonexistent reasons. I will not stand for it.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
QFT.Oso wrote: Based on the way Tasky has posted so far, if his questions are some sort of scum gambit, I am not seeing it.
Yes, if you look at it like a math problem, you're right. The thing is, this isn't a math problem. Words rarely obey the commutative property.Friend wrote: @quadz - he wasn't saying diddin said that specifically. He said that:
"My plan for getting out of the RVS worked, whether my bandwagon succeeded or not" is equivalent to "My bandwagon didn't succeed, so we got out of RVS" logically, like a math problem. Correct me if I'm wrong, xvart.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
What I said was that I could see how he might be seen as scummy, not that I saw him as scummy. I understand your opinion, I simply do not share it.
And yes, I agree that what Diddin said is contradictory. However, I believe it to be a result of poor word choice, not of an attempt to look more townie. It's far too blatant (and too illogical) for that to fly.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
To an extent, I suppose. Oso made good points, there's nothing wrong with solid reasoning changing your opinion.
But, speaking of good points:
Hmmmm. I'm torn.Friend wrote: Especially because he unvotes Tasky and then, in his next post, calls Tasky scum. Doesn't match up.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
BANDWAGON ON Q21!!!!!
Aww, crap. Too late.
Anyway, I agree about vezok. I'm glad KageLord noticed the time differential between vezok's post and SSBF's; that was well done. Vezok's very first post was an immediate vote on Tasky for "subtly" ending RVS, which was a scum-tell to him. However, Tasky very clearly pointed out he was attempting to end RVS:
Far from subtle, hm?Tasky wrote:now... since I'd actually like to get out of the RVS fast, I'll ask some questions for you to answer...
He also said he thought quicklynches could be beneficial, and has provided close to none of his own opinion. (Of course, this early in the game, that's not really a big deal.)
I think right now, he's the scummiest-looking player, so...
VOTE: vezokpirakaCurrent Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Heaven forbid I have a differing opinion on a player from someone else, amirite? That was a very foolish statement, methinks.SSBF wrote: Defending people is a scum tell, period.
As to the vezok posting-time controversy: I don't think the length of time it took is really the issue. It's negligence, quite simply. He has only himself to blame for not seeing that post, and even if he didn't see/read it before he posted, it's his responsibility to keep up with what was posted, and an EBWOP wouldn't have been so difficult to make.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Oh, crap. I just did a quick re-read; I had forgotten that vezok had, in fact, acknowledged SSBF's post in an EBWOP. My apologies, vezok; I wasn't intending to misrepresent you.
However, I still feel that vezok is more likely to be scum than anyone else at this point. All of his posts have been very short, and generally consist of responses and not much else. I know pretty much nothing about his usual posting style, but it seems to me that he could be trying to hang back, while still posting. Lurking without really lurking, if you will.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Ok, vezok. I read through the first 9 pages of 950. While the LENGTH of your posts is about consistent with this one, I think there is significantly more content in 950 than there is here. You have questioned no one and provided very little of your opinion in this game, which is quite opposite of 950. I believe my point still stands.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
So if my opinion and my actions didn't match up, that'd be worse, right?xvart wrote:
quadz08 wrote:
SSBF wrote:
Defending people is a scum tell, period.
Heaven forbid I have a differing opinion on a player from someone else, amirite? That was a very foolish statement, methinks.
Says the guy who blatantly defended diddin for no reason.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
The point would be to get my opinion across on diddin's comment. Yes, it was a defense of what he said. However, I think that every opinion expressed in this game is, at its core, either an attack or a defense of another player. If the only opinions you express are attacking opinions, then that's your choice. That doesn't make a defense a scummy play.xvart wrote:
Of course; my point was more it is expected for you to say that since you have already been found to be blatantly defending someone for no apparent reason. Also, you missed my question:quadz08, 162 wrote:So if my opinion and my actions didn't match up, that'd be worse, right?xvart wrote:Also, what was the point of the comment at all, if it wasn't to score town points?
I plan on re-reading everything sometime soon to get a fresh perspective on what's going on. I'll post my thoughts as soon as I have them haha.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Ok, I've now done a re-read of the whole thread. woooooo! Dang, we spent a long time arguing about Tasky's questions. Ugh.
My number one suspect right now is SSBF. First and foremost is this:
This is part of his ISO #9. To me, what this statement boils down to is that if a player has a reasonable point saying that a player is not scum (or may not be scum, or whatever), he shouldn't bring it up if that person is thought to be scummy. That makes no sense to me. "Gee, I have this opinion that, if brought up, may keep us from lynching a townie. But that's a no-no! Only scum defend people!" I just don't see how forcing out opinions is pro-town in any way.SSBF wrote: Defending people is a scum tell, period.
There is also this (found in his ISO #8):
SSBF made a pretty big deal about what was clearly a jokey vote. Like someone (diddin, maybe?) said earlier, it seems like he's grasping at straws. Yes, we were in the serious stage. But come on, it's a game, dangit! Let a man make a dumb joke. It meant nothing and did no harm to scumhunting. Not worth the attention it's gotten.SSBF wrote: Absolutely hate this. I see absolutely no purpose of that self-vote, especially since we're already getting something to work on in this game.
I also have an eye on KageLord, xvart, and vezok, but nobody has really exhibited any huge scumtells that I've seen. SSBF seems to me the wisest D1 lynch, at this point.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
@vezok: My sympathies, my friend. You'll be in my thoughts.
@Tasky: Your point system is interesting. I pretty much agree with your ISO on vezok, and this:
is an excellent point.he is/was the centre of attention of a lot of peoples posts... since a lot of peoples have debated against/for/with him, making him flip will give us more information that anyones else's flip
I would be ok with a vezok lynch today. I still think SSBF looks scummier, but vezok certainly has a good enough case against him to be lynched today.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
So... IMHO, jay is either being REALLY dumb, or telling the truth. I'm leaning towards really dumb.
Any player with brains should know that in a normal game, having a role (especially an investigative one) that can be used before N1 is remarkably rare. In fact, I don't know of any roles that CAN investigate before N1. Unless the mod decided to try something new out (which I don'tthinkis standard procedure in normal games), jay is making things up.
Here are my options:
A) Jay is a day-cop, who's telling the truth, albeit stupidly.
B) Jay is a lyncher, who's going about it remarkably obtusely.
C) Jay is a jester, which isn't a huge stretch after that post.
Whatever the case may be, his method of producing that information was quite foolish, methinks. I'm unsure what to think of his alignment, but I do find it possible that he could be a jester... or a mafia-aligned bomb? Or some such thing.
Please explain, jay.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
@Humble:
I think the fact that I come across as wishy-washy is the biggest problem with my playstyle. By nature, it usually takes a lot for me to commit to a certain judgement of a situation or person. I try not to throw my vote around carelessly, and other players' opinions are almost as important to me as mine. I don't see my judgement as any more valid than anyone else's, so when someone provides good insight, I'm not afraid to have it figure into my own reasonings. (And, depending on the situation, supercede my own reasonings.) I think that this sometimes makes me come across as a fence-sitter/parrotting/whatever.
My guess is that there's 3 mafia, in 1 group, but that's only because it seems pretty standard. We'll find out more tonight, after we see who gets NK'ed (and how many NK's there are.)Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
@xvart:
It's that and some gut feeling. He and vezok look scummiest to me right now. SSBF's grasping of straws and dislike of defense of others comes across as scummier to me than vezok's short posts. Not by a huge stretch, but still more. But like I said, I'm willing to lynch either.
We need to ensure that we lynch someone; D1 ends in 3 days. I will switch my vote to KageLord if the deadline comes up and my vote is needed on him to ensure a lynch today; that is a significantly better option than allowing a NL. I say this so that (if it comes to it) everyone understands why I did it, and so people can inform me if that's a terrible idea.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Sorry, that was poor wording on my part. In my head, my earlier declaration of vezok as 2nd scummiest meant that I would switch to him if that's where the lynch looks to be happening. I pointed you out specifically because you're on the general radar and I hadn't mentioned you. To clarify, I am willing to switch to KageLord or vezok to ensure a lynch. I may be willing to switch to others as well, if the need arises.KageLord wrote: quadz, you start off by saying, as you have been recently, that you think SSBF is scummiest followed by vezo. I'm wondering why you say in your next paragraph that you would switch to me to prevent a no lynch. I was just tied with vezo in votes, until Poirot unvoted, so more on either one of us would probably result in that person being lynched (if you switch to vezo, someone else will probably do the same). If vezo is the second scummiest to you and you would be willing to lynch him or SSBF as you say above, why switch to me instead of him?Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
TBH, xvart, I'm not sure. I think I need to sit down and re-read the thread again; maybe write some thoughts down. Now that you bring it up in that manner, I feel like I need to straighten out my thoughts.xvart wrote:
Why is vezok scummier than I? You are saying that SSBF is scummy because of the self vote comment, saying "defending someone is a scumtell", and gut. Then vezok is slightly less scummy because of short posts. Then you are only keeping an eye on me when I am guilty of everything SSBF is (minus the apparent gut)?quadz08 wrote:@xvart:
It's that and some gut feeling. He and vezok look scummiest to me right now. SSBF's grasping of straws and dislike of defense of others comes across as scummier to me than vezok's short posts. Not by a huge stretch, but still more. But like I said, I'm willing to lynch either.
xvart.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
I did not find anyone scummy for that, I don't believe. I thought it was mostly a discussion of theory, not anything that showed a whole lot of tell one way or another.Sotty7 wrote:quadz starts off the game very neutral. Understands the “Tasky is scummy” situation but doesn't agree. I wonder quadz, did you find anyone scummy for pushing that line of thought?
I do not. Oso (I think) made a good point about not using out-of-game reasoning, because who knows what was happening IRL. I hadn't thought about that before Oso brought it up.Sotty7 wrote: He spends a little while not voting and seems to be feeling the game out until this:
The bold part is the most striking to me. quadz, do you still think the time difference in between the two posts is a good point in the vezo case?quadz08 Post 112 wrote:BANDWAGON ON Q21!!!!!
Aww, crap. Too late.
Anyway, I agree about vezok.I'm glad KageLord noticed the time differential between vezok's post and SSBF's; that was well done.Vezok's very first post was an immediate vote on Tasky for "subtly" ending RVS, which was a scum-tell to him. However, Tasky very clearly pointed out he was attempting to end RVS:
Far from subtle, hm?Tasky wrote:now... since I'd actually like to get out of the RVS fast, I'll ask some questions for you to answer...
He also said he thought quicklynches could be beneficial, and has provided close to none of his own opinion. (Of course, this early in the game, that's not really a big deal.)
I think right now, he's the scummiest-looking player, so...
VOTE: vezokpiraka
You're right, SSBF did ignore me. However, that wasn't a pressure vote. That was a "this guy is scummy, so I'm voting him" vote. If he didn't respond, then that's his choice to ignore it. I saw no need to push him into responding to it; what would I have said? "Hey, SSBF, I voted for you! Aren't you going to comment on it?" I'm sure that would have looked much less scummy.Sotty7 wrote: His case on SSBF does seem to come from nowhere, but he said he did a re-read and re-reads are when you would hope new info comes up. But after the case he does little to push his vote. SSBF's post after quadz votes him makes no mention of the vote or case on him. He just totally ignores this. Then quadz ignores the fact he is being ignored and we get a lot of nothing. That just doesn't seem like a townie reaction to me. Your vote gets ignored so you carrying doing nothing that has anything to do with your top suspect? Feels fake.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Waiting for other scumtells to come out of him, and repeating that I think he is scum. There isn't much else to do, that I can see. I can't keep repeating the same case over and over, that would accomplish nothing, and look scummy.Okay. Tell me, outside of your vote what are you doing to get SSBF lynched?Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
As to your first sentence: I agree, and I have done that to the best of my ability.xvart wrote: An important part about presenting cases is to make sure you present it in such a way that you don't look scummy, right? Only scummy people worry about looking scummy.
As to your second sentence: I disagree. If a townie looks scummy because of the way he's made a case on someone, then that distracts the town from looking for the real scum. This is what is happening now, methinks.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Please, explain why this is lame. I'll take a mislynch over a nolynch on Day 1 every time. At least we get some information this way. Even if I'm to be lynched, that's all right; at least I'll be giving town information to work with in subsequent Days.Humble Poirot wrote:quadz apparently doesn't favor vezok lynch over kage. He just wants to avoid nolynch.
lame.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
The people who were on my wagon, for one. You can bet that at LEAST one scum, probably more, is on it. They know that I'm playing scummily, and so will be a pretty easy lynch, so voting for me is relatively safe. I wouldn't be surprised if every scum is voting for me at the end of the day, if they aren't already (assuming I'm the lynch).Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
I don't think they're necessarily "pushing" the wagon. Honestly, of the people on my wagon, the only one I've seen reason to suspect is vezok. That doesn't mean he's the only possible scum on my wagon, though; heaven knows I'm far from a great scumhunter.xvart wrote:Who specifically? The people on your wagon would include seven people by the time it comes to completion. That doesn't really help the town narrow it down. If you think scum are likely pushing this wagon, that would mean that someone currently on it would be scum; so why are you not voting anyone on your wagon?
Perhaps "easy" wasn't the right term. I was intending to mean that scum could vote for me without a terrible amount of pressure on them to explain, especially as we reach the end of the day.xvart wrote: It hasn't been an easy lynch, since it has taken almost a full three weeks to get it going. In fact, the wagon just got steam yesterday.
On that note, since SSBF doesn't look like he will be lynched today: UNVOTE: SSBF, VOTE: vezok
And, since it seems to be that time, I'm claiming. I am a vanilla townie.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
I was merely going by statistics, and how most of the games I've read through/played/heard about have worked. As I said, of the people voting me, the only one I have found scummy is vezok.Sotty wrote: The VT claim at lynch -2 pushes me more towards placing my vote on quadz. Combine that with his last couple of posts where he is so sure the scum are voting him and yet won't say who.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
I don't like how he has made several short posts, with essentially zero content. (I know, I know, I can hear the shouts of "hypocrite!" already.) His vote on me was motivated purely by pressure (as he said, "Here get some pressure if it's needed. My vote is still on kagelord but xvart apparently wants some help.") and he provided no reasons other than that to vote for me. This post is also a pretty heavy contradiction, as he says that the game is getting boring because no one is asking questions of him, then says that another player needs to do his own work and not active lurk.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Hope you have a tasty headpiece.xvart wrote: I'll eat my hat.
I disagree with this. I think townies are very much concerned with avoiding suspicion, because if they play scummily, then they get mislynched, wasting time and helping the scum. I have very clearly failed in this regard.SSBF wrote: Why are you so concerned about commiting a scum tell? A town would be more focused on finding scums then avoiding suspicion.
Also, I'm pretty sure vezok is at L-2, unless there was an unvote I missed. I currently have myself, KageLord, Tasky, sotty, and SSBF voting for vezok, jay voting for Humble, and everyone else voting for me.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Apology accepted. I played pretty badly, to be fair. However, I must ask: how did the hat taste?xvart wrote:Good game, everyone. I hope quadz comes back so I can apologize for rallying everyone to his lynch. My only explanation, and Humble hit it pretty much on the head here. I had nailed scum on D1 in the last three games I had played, and my read on quadz was stronger than any of those reads; which is why I was so vehement about it.
Scum and Masons - will you share your QT?
xvart.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
-
-
quadz08 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: May 30, 2010
- Location: where the wily things are
Jeez, be all serious. Whatever.Humble Poirot wrote:
Disappointingly non-hilarious doesn't get you lynched.quadz08 wrote:
Wise, but disappointingly non-hilarious.Humble Poirot wrote:
wise.xvart wrote:lol. Not too good. I was actually going to post some random image of a guy eating a hat from google images but I decided it wouldn't do well to dwell on it or bring it up.Current Avatar: Kronk. Duh.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.