Will post in a little bit...
-DRK
That's just bad reasoning. OMGUS has never been a particularly strong scumtell in my mind, and if that statement was true, then town v.s. scum is determined by who attacks first. If someone has a bad case against you, then you speak out. That's not OMGUS, friend.Zodiark wrote: "On my OMGUS point against SSK, my opinion is that OMGUS is OMGUS, even if it is well reasoned."
This is also scummy.Zodiark wrote: If you see SSK as anti-town, why not a compromise and policy lynch SSK.
Right after my first post. I posted a vote with any explanation, you joined onto that vote with your own explanation.Super Awesome Mega Pimp wrote: When did I do that?
I've never seen such blatant misrepresentation before...Zodiark wrote: So I'm scummy because I think someone is scummy?
Then if you realized all of that, why didn't you keep it to yourself?Zodiark wrote:
Hence the reasons I asked.
...by telling them to disregard their scum reads and lynch him for being anti-town. In other words, you're not getting people to join the lynch by showing HOW he's scummy, you're just sitting there and saying "Well... he may not be scummy, but he's anti-town at least, so we should lynch him.Zodiark wrote: How? You can't just call something scummy and not back it up. This also contradicts your point that I'm not pushing for a lynch. I'm trying to persuade others to join.
Why would you wait to FoS? Afraid of how the town would view it if you did?Zodiark wrote: You can't just replace and then throw things like that around with as poor a reason as this. I'll give you then benefit of the doubt and not FoS you just yet.
Wait. You've made 18 posts in 15 days, and you just now added the game to your watched topics list...? You even took a two-day V/LA and didn't forget about it in this time? Impressive.easjo682 wrote: I'm here! sorry I didn't save the game to my watched topics list, so I forgot all about it.
Just so everyone knows. Let's see how high the count gets without us seeing everything!MafiaSSK Date: 2 days ago. wrote: Expect another large post tomorrow.
What kind of bullshit is this?Zodiark wrote: On that note, he only claimed that he was OSV, not weather he was a town OSV, or a scum one.
Why?Zodiark wrote: Please, no one hammer in the meantime, cause I wanna do it.
Request 72 hour deadline extension on the grounds that the 3 people in this post just happen to be the three major bandwagons.DeathRowKitty wrote:Zodiark13 is being prodded.
easjo will be prodded if he doesn't post in the next 3 hours.
MafiaSSK picked up his prod, but is now V/LA due to computer issues.
DeathRowKitty wrote:Zodiark13 is being prodded.
easjo will be prodded if he doesn't post in the next 3 hours.
MafiaSSK picked up his prod, but is now V/LA due to computer issues.
So you read my nine other games, then? Nice!Zodiark wrote: Wow, THAT doesn't sound familiar.
1) I thought he was scum.Greendude wrote: @nachomamma: why didn't you regret the hammer?
Well, there are two possible scenarios:GreenDude wrote: There is 2 possible scenarios:
1) DeathSauce is scum.
2) He's not.
If he's not, he already used up his ability. If he's scum then we're happy. We have a 1 in 2 chance of lynching scum today.
Thanks for that. Let me introduce you to a little invention I like to call... READING!Super Awesome Mega Pimp! wrote: No they wouldn't have. They're vigs. They have these marvelous inventions called "guns". Since you've apparently never heard of one before, they're what vigs use to "kill" the fakeclaims at night without giving away their role in a counterclaim.
Nachomamma8 wrote: That doesn't seem like something scum would do, though; too much risk of being vigged tonight.
I don't understand any of this post.DeathSauce wrote:I can understand the hesitancy, but it's only lylo if we're wrong. And we have our cop actually screaming in all-caps from beyond the grave that he's found scum. I think the course is clear.
I think that we have to be a lot more careful from now on; I'd rather see peg replaced than lynched because at the moment, we don't have the numbers to go on a lurker hunt.wolframhart wrote: What do you think about the current events Nacho?
What defense do you want to hear from PEG? Is there really any excuse he can come up with to save the constant lurking, save for some content/a clear, concise case against someone else? Couldn't a replacement provide that?Damon_Gant wrote:Because it will be impossible for a replacement to try and defend his actions, and I need to hear PEG's defense really badly.Nachomamma8 wrote:Why don't you want peg to be replaced?Damon_Gant wrote:Oh god I hope there's no replacement.My Milked Eek wrote:Also,mod;prod or replace peg. It's been 8 days.