Damn. Y'all wish you were this cool...
Pegging scum of Locke, Parama, and ConfidAnon right now. You can thank me later.
Don't answer that, please.muzzz wrote: The the wikipage Duck linked to said that a hider dies if his target gets NKed. Can you confirm or deny if this is the case for you?
Parama questioned, let Ken answer, then voted when an answer didn't come. You two piggybacked off his reasoning.ConfidAnon wrote: Why mention myself and duckduck, but not Parama?
Do you think there is a good chance of there being only 2 scum in this game?Parama wrote: I guess Ken's explanation could be the truth but I'm not set on it yet, and I don't have any other player I'd prefer moving my vote to.
Then who's scummier than him, for the moment? What good is your vote doing in the "Not Voting" space?duckduck96 wrote:I don't really feel like voting for him again until we've heard more from him. I'll make my decision once he responds.
Ken, did you miss this post or simply ignore it?duckduck96 wrote:As a matter of fact, I was typing my post while he posted his. So really this is a null tell, our unvotes were at almost the same timeNachomamma8 wrote: The immediate vote after the Confid vote, then the immediate vote after the confid unvote is scummy to me.
ConfidAnon wrote:I believe duckduck is implying that if you are scum, then Nikanor looks suspicious to. He believes that your excitement sounds fake, as if Nikanor were faking a role as mafia and you (being his scumpartner in this scenario) are acting like you believe it.Kenman, 94 wrote:I am not too sure how whether or not I was excited about the hider role makes me appear mafia or not. This being my first game with this role, I would have brought it up regardless if I was town or mafia. But at least you are providing support and evidence for your claim.
[/url][/area]Duckduck96 wrote:I'm inclined to believe his claim
It's quicklynchable because there were 4 scum in that game. Practical? No. Quicklynchable? Yes.DT Master wrote: Why are you calling L-4 in mafia 94 quicklynchable? That means you accuse Duck for helping put Ken in L-4, which reads as the same in the wagon on Ken.
I'd call of it more of a OMG YOU WERE AFRAID TO PUT A SECOND VOTE ON HIM --> scummy, wouldn't you? Note, I'm not using muzzz's argument myself. I'm just pointing out that I see it could be valid, thus why I'm not voting him.DT Master wrote: In an unvote on someone who reads as a town, you are using: OMG YOU DIDN'T WAGON argument + meta -> scummy
Why not?DT Master wrote: I don't think you are correct in your statement of Duck.
Wait, Nikki is a man? Does this mean I'm...?Nikanor wrote:It looks like I'm going to have to explainyet anothercase to Parama.
dramonic is doing nothing. He is actively lurking. He does not do that as town.
Done.
Who said I was trying? >_>dramonic wrote:Also, if you wanna pass as a female you shouldnt jump in innuendos like that.
Alright, so you know where we're coming from. Now, why have you redeemed yourself to the point where we shouldn't lynch you?SpyreX wrote: if I hadn't replaced into that spot I probably would have lynched the hell out of him.
It's me being disconnected from this game for a little while... Sorry 'bout that.DT Master wrote: I don't know if it's just Nacho skimming through my posts, or if it's a sign that Nacho doesn't care about scum hunting.
SpyreX is still scum, though.Nobody Special, April 06 wrote: Of course I am. But tomorrow. I have to go now.
Silly boy, you don't have to teach me. I do know how to play....