Mini 863 - Space Station Mafia: GAME OVER - EVERYONE'S DEAD


User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #580 (isolation #0) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:48 am

Post by Looker »

unvote
vote empking
Peabody's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1963834#1963834]Post 579[/url] wrote:Welcome to the game, Looker! I hope you can help us out!!
I can try. My suspicions as of this post are as follows.

One of CoolDog and Empking is Mafia along with one of the following:

Milkshake
Messiah
Sposh
Almaster

Currently, I'm leaning Empking due to his absence on the HipHop wagon; however, this contradicts my reason for suspecting Almaster because I believe his presence on the HipHop wagon could have been a bussing manuever. Now, of course, this is speculation, but I'm willing to discourse on the matter.


I'm also curious as to why there were no kills last night.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #582 (isolation #1) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:38 am

Post by Looker »

AlmasterGM's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1964624#1964624]Post 581[/url] wrote:I don't like how Sposh has used disappearing as a tactic to get rid of the wagon on him.
Could you dignify my allegations that you and Empking are Mafia with a response/rebuttal? I don't mean to hassle you, a simple "You're wrong" would suffice, too. Thnx!
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #584 (isolation #2) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:05 pm

Post by Looker »

That's all I asked. Thank you for your cooperation, Almaster.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #585 (isolation #3) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:32 pm

Post by Looker »

And, since I work well with pressure

vote deadline
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #588 (isolation #4) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:36 pm

Post by Looker »

What are your thoughts on the probability of one of Empking and CoolDog being Mafia? If probable, which? If not, never mind me asking.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #589 (isolation #5) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:38 pm

Post by Looker »

And also, what happened to cause your unvote?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #591 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:45 pm

Post by Looker »

Sorry, but I kind of have a slight aversion to that term. I believe you're
Mafia
because:

- You weren't on the HipHop Wagon
- Before my vote, both you and CoolDog were tied for the lynch and usually when this happens, from my experience, and Mafia don't take advantage of it, one of the candidates are Mafia. I picked you over CoolDog because of your absence on HipHop's wagon.

Do you think I chose wrong? You think I should be voting CoolDog instead or do you believe he's town, too? And what about Sposh/Almaster? You think either of them are suspicious or am I just too out there to bother?


Did I come in at a bad time or something or is this not a very talkative town?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #594 (isolation #7) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:19 am

Post by Looker »

Empking's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1965746#1965746]Post 592[/url] wrote:- Nor was a lot of the town.
- Surely that means that one of Cooldog and Sposh is scum as well? If that's the case then it'd make sense that CoolDog is the scum there. (He had been joint at three for longer than anyone.)

Sposh and Al are town. Cool is scum.
- You, myself, Coco, Messiah, and HipHop were the only ones not on the HipHop wagon, right? And you and Coco weren't voting at all; however, that's not my sole reason for suspecting you. That's my primary reason for suspecting you over CoolDog as of your recent tie in votes.
- I'm not sure how to handle the second part. I'm hesitant to act upon it because it's a fact that doesn't exist anymore. Sposh and Cool are no longer tied. They might have been in the past but they're not anymore, now it's you and Cool. Either way, it
could
collaborate with my more recent speculation of you and Sposh being Mafia due to Sposh's recent and unexplained unvote.

And as far as both Sposh and Al being town, I'm hesitant to believe that at the moment.
In Post [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1965753#1965753]593[/url], Hoopla wrote: You didn't talk about any of your predecessor's posts, and rereading NAW, I've found some of his play rather perculiar. Perhaps you can give me your take on it?


Also, one more thing. Why are you using this as point against Empking, when NAW was guilty of this too?
Looker wrote: - You weren't on the HipHop Wagon
Wish I could be of more help in dissecting the intentions of my predecessors posts but all I can say is that different experiences breed different playstyles, different intentions, and different appreciations. NAW was different, I guess.

And regarding the double-standard point, I was using that point against Empking in the Empking V CoolDog department if that makes sense. (If it doesn't, I'm sure I can find some way to...well..explain it)

It's good to have some discussion going, I appreciate the input.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #598 (isolation #8) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 2:48 pm

Post by Looker »

unvote
vote sposh

Hoopla's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1965793#1965793]Post 595[/url] wrote:
Looker wrote: And regarding the double-standard point, I was using that point against Empking in the Empking V CoolDog department if that makes sense. (If it doesn't, I'm sure I can find some way to...well..explain it)
That's valid, and we really should be lynching someone today who wasn't on hiphop's final wagon. That a far worse offense than any bussing scenario.

Vote: Deadline


Lets kill Empking.
Any suspicions as to who could be Empking's remaining partner if Empking is Mafia and not CoolDog?
milkshake's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1965885#1965885]Post 596[/url] wrote:Empking is no where near as good as Messiah, but as I promised,
unvote, vote: empking
.

Claim time!
You promised? Okay. What do you think about Sposh?
Empking's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1966437#1966437]Post 597[/url] wrote:Looker: I'm not equal with Cool either so your case is

"I wasn't on hiphop's final wagon." along with you so are you scum too?

Plus none of the players are on a hiphop bandwagon now because "it doesn't exist any more" so you don't have anything really.
Uh-uh. You and Cool were tied for the lynch and I picked you over Cool because Cool was on HipHop's wagon and you weren't. And the second part's kind of silly, so I don't know what you mean.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #600 (isolation #9) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:10 pm

Post by Looker »

Just want to make sure I'm right before I try to lynch someone. I already stated that I was trying to decide between Empking and CoolDog; however, I'm figuring that there were three Mafia to start off with so there's another one out there. I'm trying to figure out who's that other one before I jump the gun on anything.

Why do you ask? Do you find my unvote anymore suspicious than Sposh's unvote?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #602 (isolation #10) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 7:23 pm

Post by Looker »

Regarding "my decision" (It sounds so formal):

- Empking - OR - CoolDog
- The third Mafia member, whom I believe to be Sposh at the moment

I'm trying to narrow this down to a single point of failure which is why I'm choosing Sposh as opposed to taking chances choosing either Empking or CoolDog and making an avoidable mistake.

I
am
leaning Empking though due to his incorrect summation of my case and his absence on the HipHop wagon but I'm trying not to be too speculative or scrutinizing and penalize someone for playstyle. This is why my vote is currently on Sposh. I'm also curious as to why he unvoted (Sposh).
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #604 (isolation #11) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:19 pm

Post by Looker »

I also think lurking when a partner's in the hotseat could be a utilized technique as well so I'll go back and see if I can find any of that in the thread as well.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #605 (isolation #12) » Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:19 pm

Post by Looker »

EBWOP: Get rid of one of those "as well"'s
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #607 (isolation #13) » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:56 am

Post by Looker »

But of course the HipHop wagon doesn't exist anymore because HipHop is dead. HipHop is
still
dead; however, Cool and Sposh are not still tied for votes. Is it a flaw in my logic that you've realized or a matter of semantics? I actually thought you'd be more concerned with me choosing you over CoolDog or Milkshake's recent vote on you than a matter of wording. But, either way, you
did
mention Sposh and earlier you did state that he and CoolDog were Mafia and that Almaster was town.

So, acting on this, would you be willing to change your vote to Sposh?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #620 (isolation #14) » Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:56 pm

Post by Looker »

O my gosh, what happened? Is this one of those patches you were talking about? Either way, I'm pretty upset about not being Queen of the Towne; however, I guess I could settle for being the Queen's Royal Jester.

I'd also like to hear Sposh's thoughts on the matter and his suspicions. I'd also like a vote from him because I'm rather leary of fence-sitting.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #623 (isolation #15) » Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:28 pm

Post by Looker »

@Sposh: That vote doesn't have to be between CoolDog and Empking, it can be on whoever you want.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #636 (isolation #16) » Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:44 pm

Post by Looker »

unvote
vote empking


@Almaster & Peabody: One of us has to be right
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #642 (isolation #17) » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:33 am

Post by Looker »

Milkshake, are you the remaining scum...?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #645 (isolation #18) » Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:46 pm

Post by Looker »

Aw, Peabody, how
towny
of you.

@Milkshake: So you're saying both Empking
and
CoolDog are town?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #658 (isolation #19) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:39 am

Post by Looker »

It doesn't feel right.

unvote
vote Milkshake


Flying by the seat of my pants here but I guess all I can do is wait for the claim
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #660 (isolation #20) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:42 am

Post by Looker »

no i didnt
where is all this confirmed stuff?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #665 (isolation #21) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:51 am

Post by Looker »

But wouldn't that take three people to verify? Couldn't both Empking and Milk be corroborating with each other? This is all post-lynch speculation, though, of course. Let's see the verdict.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #666 (isolation #22) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:52 am

Post by Looker »

But wouldn't that take three people to verify? Couldn't both Empking and Milk be corroborating with each other? This is all post-lynch speculation, though, of course. Let's see the verdict.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #668 (isolation #23) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:55 am

Post by Looker »

O, okay, so you verify? That's cool. I just hadn't saw anyone else other than Milk and Empking to verify this.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #670 (isolation #24) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Looker »

O...so you're a jester?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #671 (isolation #25) » Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Looker »

Sorry, you prolly won't catch the humor in that so just disregard if possible.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #678 (isolation #26) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:23 pm

Post by Looker »

Something's wrong here. One of you's not telling the truth.

vote empking
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #680 (isolation #27) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 4:31 pm

Post by Looker »

Somewhere somebody said that Empking and Milk were both confirmed town. I don't believe them. There has to be a fakeclaim or something out there. I'm not giving in to the flavor.

On top of that, the three main suspects yesterday were CoolDog, Sposh, and Empking, and now the other two are dead. Maybe Almaster's Mafia, I don't know. Confused, just responding to your request for elaboration if somewhat half-heartedly.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #685 (isolation #28) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:40 pm

Post by Looker »

Daft? Howso, eternal birthday girl?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #686 (isolation #29) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:41 pm

Post by Looker »

WAIT! U mean like Daft Punk?!? OMG I LUV THOSE GUYS!!! :mrgreen:
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #693 (isolation #30) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:18 pm

Post by Looker »

But what about safeclaims? Can we disprove those? I'll admit it's rather contrived how both CoolDog and Sposh are out of the running, but you can't place all your cards on the table at once. So so far, we have Milk, Almaster, and Empking collaborating with Empking's claim. Do you believe him, too?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #694 (isolation #31) » Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:19 pm

Post by Looker »

And of course I don't need to die, I'm (bout) as towny as it gets!
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #697 (isolation #32) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Looker »

milkshake wrote:Well Looker isn't a vanilla townie, that's for certain.

Peabody I'm pretty sure is scum.
Or Looker got her role pm
after
the de-flavoring of the thread. Let's not rule
that
out :wink:

But of course, this would all be fishing and I'm not one for fishing...
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #700 (isolation #33) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:26 am

Post by Looker »

D1 doesn't vote; D2 lynches CoolDog; D3, tries to lynch me - come on, now, Empking's obvscum. I seriously believe there's a safeclaim going on somewhere.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #701 (isolation #34) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:27 am

Post by Looker »

HowardRoark wrote:
unvote
vote Looker


So did I.
Well damn it I'm PMing the Mod to see what's going on here
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #702 (isolation #35) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:27 am

Post by Looker »

Hate to be all "I'm tellin' Mod!" but I'm confused
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #706 (isolation #36) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 703, Messiah wrote:Looker, what are you asking the mod?
Whether or not I received the correct format of role pm because it's only one sentence and very ambiguous.
In post 704, charlatan wrote:Sorry for getting back to the game late, everyone. My birthday was this weekend, so I was a bit distracted.

I'm probably going to double post, firstly dealing with Looker and then addressing other concerns in the second post (not sure how long I have before I need to run off for the evening, and I don't want to get any more behind.)
Looker wrote: On top of that, the three main suspects yesterday were CoolDog, Sposh, and Empking, and now the other two are dead. Maybe Almaster's Mafia, I don't know.
From my point of view, that does nothing to increase the likelihood of Empking being scum. In your opinion, what does hyposcum Empking gain by eliminating both of yesterday's vote magnets?
In post 680, Looker wrote:On top of that, the three main suspects yesterday were CoolDog, Sposh, and Empking, and now the other two are dead.
Maybe Almaster's Mafia
, I don't know. Confused, just responding to your request for elaboration if somewhat half-heartedly.
In post 705, charlatan wrote: @Looker: I forgot one other thing. You were bringing up safeclaims at the end of yesterday, too, but at the time seemed to find milkshake more likely to be scum than Empking, at least as evidenced by your vote. (Alternately, you may have found milkshake more viable since the Empking wagon had just been deflated.) Was it only CooLDoG's flip that caused you to reverse your stance?
I knew one of them was Milk's partner, I just didn't know which.


And it was Almaster who said he verified the claims. What kind of sick, twisted plot
is
this? (It's like trying to untangle a very knotted knot)
In post 672, AlmasterGM wrote:
Hoopla wrote:Hahahaha, if CoolDoG flips scum, you're going to be in a bit of trouble, Peabody.
He's actually in trouble regardless of whether or not CoolDoG flips scum.
Looker wrote:But wouldn't that take three people to verify? Couldn't both Empking and Milk be corroborating with each other? This is all post-lynch speculation, though, of course. Let's see the verdict.
I'll verify it.
O, and
why am I at L-1?!?!?
(Let it be known Empking's on my wagon)
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #707 (isolation #37) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:54 pm

Post by Looker »

EBWOP: Generic - it's very generic.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #716 (isolation #38) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:30 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 710, AlmasterGM wrote:
Unvote.
I still don't like Peabody. I'd hammer Looker right now, but that'd probably cause a massive uproar, so I won't.
Are you testing the waters? Either way, you didn't say anything at all about me in your post but feel the need to vote me. (Don't take that as an inquiry as to why)
In post 711, Messiah wrote:I'd really like to vote Looker right now, but it appears that she's at L-1. She makes a far-fetched assumption to justify refusing to believe Empking is confirmed, and I can only see scum motivation for doing so.
What kind of scum motivation? Pray tell...
In post 712, Hoopla wrote:Since we have a majority with Messiah expressing interest in a Looker lynch, she ought to claim. Please nobody hammer until we have sufficient conversation about her and other possibilities.
I'm Town. That is the paraphrased jist of the ongoing convo with Lobstermania. I asked if I had the correct role pm format and he said my role pm was correct - I'm Town. He made no mention of Passive Astronaughts or any vanillaness or anything. He just said I'm Town.
In post 713, milkshake wrote:Honestly I, too, would be OK with voting Looker, but don't exactly want to hammer, which makes three of us. I'd ask for a claim, but looker has practically claimed VT, hasn't he?

Post 709 is a good point.
I agree, Post 709
is
a good point. The plot(/knot) thickens...
In post 715, charlatan wrote:A Looker claim would probably help clarify. She is probably the right choice, but I don't like that she jumped to L-1 in a page, even despite the extremely dubious stance towards Empking and Milkshake. Her reply in 706 only makes it worse -- for the most part she ignored the points I raised, and then there's this:
I knew one of them was Milk's partner, I just didn't know which.
So if she's still working from the assumption that Milkshake is scum, she should absolutely be voting Milkshake rather than taking a 50/50 on Empking or Almaster, the two possible partners in her hypothetical situation. Barring real fireworks in the next little bit, I too will be fine hammering her. But we've seen wackiness in this game in terms of role PMs, and we have no reason to rush.

@Almaster: in the meantime, no response to the points I've raised?
I have no problem dying, I just want to be right about Empking, that's all. So please, if/once I'm lynched, reconsider Empking as Mafia. PLEEEEZ :(
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #718 (isolation #39) » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:01 pm

Post by Looker »

Alright then, nobody hammer. Currently going back and forth via PM with the Mod. :?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #731 (isolation #40) » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:00 am

Post by Looker »

No PM reply yet just wanted to know what Hoopla and Almaster think of the situation and whether their thoughts are strong enough to place a vote (on whomever, of course).
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #733 (isolation #41) » Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:07 am

Post by Looker »

Whoa, thanks for the speedy reply there, guy!
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #737 (isolation #42) » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:03 pm

Post by Looker »

O, how clever.

vote milkshake
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #739 (isolation #43) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:19 am

Post by Looker »

I believe a vote from me on Almaster would be succumbing to the WIFOM of Empking's death and feel more confident voting Milkshake than anyone else at the moment. My apologies for
appearing
self-sufficient.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #740 (isolation #44) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:21 am

Post by Looker »

Nice work to the scum, tho, btw, for eluding us for this long. Unless, of course, it's Peabody, in which case you were next on my list anyway, followed by Almaster; however, if the mafia are amongst Charlatan, Messiah, and Hoopla, then congrats in completely fooling me.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #742 (isolation #45) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:43 am

Post by Looker »

We'll meet somewhere in the middle.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #745 (isolation #46) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Looker »

milkshake's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1968909#1968909]Post 625[/url] wrote:Wow great, I just searched the whole thread and I couldn't find any reason Empking would know that the name of the VT role
before
the de-theme-ing was "Passive Astronaut." Of course, the whole reason the game wasn't supposed to be themed is so that this kind of flavor thing wouldn't happen. :roll:

unvote
and please please please tell me ASAP if I'm missing something.
- I don't see how the above confirms anything; he didn't verify knowledge of the Passive Astronaut role nor did he denounce it. He only stated confusion as to where Empking got the title from.
milkshake's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1979150#1979150]Post 696[/url] wrote:Well Looker isn't a vanilla townie, that's for certain.

Peabody I'm pretty sure is scum.
- Though this strikes me as fishing, I see the second statement becoming more and more plausible with each passing day. I was dubious of the situation when I first replaced in and assessed the wagon, but thought nothing of it because it was only the second day. Now, though, it's entirely possible that HipHop and Peabody pulled a successful gambit.
milkshake's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1980162#1980162]Post 720[/url] wrote:Correct, according to the de-theming PM, my role name was switched to simply "town." And the mafia it discusses are no longer space crazed.
- I received no reference of "space crazed" anything. Did anyone else?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #746 (isolation #47) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:43 pm

Post by Looker »

I mean, he
has
been on all the lynching bandwagons since D1. (Excluding yesterday, of course, in which there was no lynch)
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #748 (isolation #48) » Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:40 pm

Post by Looker »

lobstermania's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1902566#1902566]Post 7[/url] wrote:The rules have been edited: the Mafia may use their quicktopic during the confirmation stage of the game.
- I believe the modus operandi for this game could have been "Bus like Hell, they can't catch us all." In which case I could understand the Peabody vote and any suspicions flung his way, seeing as, like I said in my last post, he's been on every lynching wagon since Day 1.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #750 (isolation #49) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:29 am

Post by Looker »

Al and Hoop...?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #754 (isolation #50) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:33 am

Post by Looker »

Yeah, I wish I could be drunk and sleepy right now, feels great lying down like that.

RE: Howard's Modkill
- As our Mod's already stated, this is his first time (awwww)

RE: Looker Incrimination
- Milkshake > Peabody > Alabaster - These are the suspects and I really wouldn't mind if we just all bandwagoned Milkshake right now. It'd be fun.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #758 (isolation #51) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:01 pm

Post by Looker »

I wouldn't call it a case per se, Peabody, but take however you want it. What I can't understand is this thread's insistence that not only is Milkshake town, but he is
confirmed
town. How is that even possible with this setup?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #759 (isolation #52) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:07 pm

Post by Looker »

And I looked at your case from the last page.

1) Your first point shows that your suspicions of me are just as wagon-related as my suspicions of you.
2) And your second point takes us back to the confirmation of town within this setup. We're not even confirming them on technicalities, you're trying to confirm them based on possibilities. We're making assumptions.

Either way, it's nice to know you have opinions. I'd really like to see Almaster's.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #761 (isolation #53) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:52 pm

Post by Looker »

This was the post I was talking about before. In this post, I only see confusion as to where Empking got the name, meaning, Empking could have said anything else, i.e. "Space Voyager", and Milkshake could have used the same format; however, it all comes down to this, we'll see what's up and what's real in a little bit. One of us is going to get lynched.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #762 (isolation #54) » Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:54 pm

Post by Looker »

"Like all great debacles, it is a matter of semantics..."
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #764 (isolation #55) » Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:40 pm

Post by Looker »

That's fine, Peabody. We'll see.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #766 (isolation #56) » Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:03 pm

Post by Looker »

Naah, it'd be nice to get a vote from them, tho. That'd speed things up.

vote deadline
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #768 (isolation #57) » Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:17 pm

Post by Looker »

Okay. Since you don't think I'm automatically scum for suspecting him, then he must be town.

unvote
vote peabody


D1 Bus.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #772 (isolation #58) » Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:50 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 770, Messiah wrote:Also,
Looker wrote:Since you don't think I'm automatically scum for suspecting him, then he must be town.
What do you mean by that?
I'M READY FOR YOU TO DIIIIIIIEEEEEEE!!!! (she shrieks aloud with general regard to the scum)
In post 771, Hoopla wrote: Looker is loopy and detached from conventional logic which makes it easy for her to get away with anything.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!



PEEEAAAAABOOOOODDYYYYY!!!!!! HOO! HOO! HOO! HOO! GRRRRR!!!
Confirm Vote Peabody


It's either him or Turkey a la mode, also known to some as Almaster, and, to the jerks, Alamaster. And, to me, Alabaster. HOO!
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #776 (isolation #59) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:02 pm

Post by Looker »

Which translates rather effortlessly to a list of suspicions, which is all we really need. We suspect the same people and that's all that matters.

Now let's turn this thing into a lynch! :D

[For future reference: No, I am not expecting the fact that I'm Town to single-handedly protect me from a lynch, so there :P ]
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #777 (isolation #60) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:03 pm

Post by Looker »

What? Messiah can't think for himself? O NO! He must be SCUM!!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #779 (isolation #61) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:04 pm

Post by Looker »

Okay, but on a serious note, if there are questions to be answered, I'll answer them logically and with bullets so as to stay on-topic.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #782 (isolation #62) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:44 pm

Post by Looker »

Up in your grill? Nice. I try to stay away from extrapolating the psyches of other people, there's too much room for reverse psychology or, as you people call it, WIFOM.

I do believe that we need to figure this whole lynch thing out, though, so I'll try and start it this way. Does anyone have anybody that they'd like to nominate for the lynch? If so, throw it out and then we can discuss whether or not it'd be a good choice for the town and why.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #783 (isolation #63) » Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:46 pm

Post by Looker »

Since this game has been all loopy, I'd like to nominate Milkshake; however, I understand that this isn't a plausible choice and I'd be fine with either Almaster or Peabody, preferably Peabody.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #786 (isolation #64) » Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:36 am

Post by Looker »

So far we have Looker, Almaster, & Peabody. Any other nominations?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #807 (isolation #65) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:50 pm

Post by Looker »

vote peabody
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #808 (isolation #66) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:50 pm

Post by Looker »

intentionally unbolded for you paranoid types
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #825 (isolation #67) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:20 pm

Post by Looker »

Peabody & Almaster. I understand that I was wrong about Empking; however, if Milkshake's out of the picture when I'm done with, reconsider Peabody & Almaster.

RE: Clear & Concise Posts - I don't think I really have to. Naah, I don't have to.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #827 (isolation #68) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:25 pm

Post by Looker »

I don't know if it helps, but the way that you guys are explaining teams seems off to me, or, rather, I have a different opinion. If there were scum teams I'd expect them to be Looker & Milkshake, Almaster & Peabody, and Messiah & Charlatan. I can't see where I ever interacted or collaborated with Milkshake in a way that would imply any affiliation whatsoever. Not to induce WIFOM, I just don't see it.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #829 (isolation #69) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:44 pm

Post by Looker »

You understand correctly. I meant to write Messiah, my apologies.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #830 (isolation #70) » Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:45 pm

Post by Looker »

O, and I'm basing them simply off of me reading the thread. That's what I think. I don't know how to do the votecount analyses and all that stuff, but I can read.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #833 (isolation #71) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:24 am

Post by Looker »

While a fight to the death would be interesting, I was thinking more along the lines of a re-evaluation.

RE: RE: RE: Clear & Concise Posts - No, I checked, I
don't
have to. "It is simply preferred".
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #836 (isolation #72) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:40 am

Post by Looker »

@Almaster: You don't suspect Peabody but you suspect Charlatan? That's nice. I also admire the paranoia, or, if you're scum, the deliberate intensity of your fallacies.

@Charlatan: Pro-Town/Anti-Town arguments are some of the weakest, sitting just below D1 Random Vote Analysis. Everyone has their opinions on what helps the town, but you can't play all positions at all times. Play your town-spot on the town-team and I'll play mine...rather poorly, of course, but that's my reponsibility...if I have any of those in online forum games...

Off to school...
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #840 (isolation #73) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:02 pm

Post by Looker »

Naah, it's dun.
unvote vote looker
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #841 (isolation #74) » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:02 pm

Post by Looker »

I'm still thinking Almaster & Peabody if it ain't Milkshake.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #848 (isolation #75) » Fri Dec 04, 2009 6:06 pm

Post by Looker »

Awww.... Go Town! lmao

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”