JereIC wrote:Netopalis wrote:Well, to explain Owen's post, there's a character in the Agatha Christie novel named U.N. Owen who talks much like he does....
That makes more sense. I'm guessing that he's doing it for fun (personally speaking, I once spent a month writing emails to friends in the style of John Hodgman's blog "
Good Evening") but it could be some sort of alt/anti-meta strategy (basically assuming a new personality for each game). Either way, it's a null tell at the moment.
UN, do you intend to post anything out of character?
Exactly what might you mean by...out of character?
Darkstrike_11 wrote:Crypto wrote:
Wagon on Owen, please.
Ahem….*in keira knightley’s voice* WHAT ARE THE CHARGES?
Seriously, reasons for why we should wagon?
Oooh questions, I nearly forgot. Although sufficient discussion has already been generated, could everyone answer these questions please?
1. How many games of mafia have you played?
2. Do you prefer Mafia or Town roles?
3. What is your favourite power role to have?
4. What is your opinion on crypto’s call for a wagon this early in the game?
Ah, Pirates of the Caribbean. A favorite.
1. 5 or 6 on this site.
2. Mafia. I prefer to have someone I can trust.
3. Good question! ... Very good indeed. I haven't the foggiest!
4. My opinion is that he should be further investigated.
Netopalis wrote:Ecto, you're right, I apologize - I meant to say Crypto. I also agree that if Owen doesn't post content he should be lynched - the usual tells still apply.
I agree.
crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: malpascp.
To adopt your style,
Vote: crypto
Mr.Jester wrote:
Netopalis wrote:For the record, I think it's a really bad idea to lynch U N Owen just because he talks funny. That may just be the worst reason for a lynch I've heard.
The case isn't that he talks funny but rather he says things that are very scummy.
I have made one post. Have I said anything that I percieve as scummy? No.
crypto wrote:*sigh*
Let me ask you guys something: Do scum often go out of their way to switch votes without reason? How does it not occur to you that I'm
trying to get something done
when I do that? Especially when I give a blatantly obvious response to JereIC in post 59. There's such a thing as fishing for reactions. Voting without presenting an argument is a shoddy reason to jump on someone. It takes the pressure off Malpascp—who, if he's mafia, will probably feel the need to come up with a pitch-perfect reaction—and dumps it on me. Well done.
If I want to wagon someone, I'm going to say so. I did so before, with Owen. Please don't be blind.
[otherbs]
ConfirmVote: Crypto
This defense (reaction fishing) is the EXACT defense I have used in the past when I was scum who realized that he had made a dumb move. Nice try.