Well,DeathRowKitty wrote:Vote: ryan2754for being scum in the last game I played!
WTH?!Idiotking wrote:
Vote Dank
For being the first person to make a second vote for someone.
Interesting. I kind of felt the same way when reading it.Paradoxombie wrote:unvote, vote:Idiot Kingfor having a "real" vote.
So let me get this straight. You have ahunch on toro. Yet, you say you will come back with reasons later.DeathRowKitty wrote: You don't like Jeff Gordon, so you put thethirdrandom vote on Jason?
Indirectly trying to protect jason from quick bandwagon?
Then HipHop gets called out about his vote (DTM said he made idiotking L4) and then hiphop unvotes. Seems scummy.
Then Paradoxombie says this:Hiphop then later in Post 33 tries to reenter the RVS with his vote on RC, not to mention it came AFTER paradoxombie's post saying it's scummy that they didn't place another vote down. Although I don't particularly agree with the idea that each unvote needs to be followed by a vote, the fact that hiphop revoted a seemingly random vote after Paradoxombie's call-out after RVS had finished is extremely scummy.Paradoxombie wrote:FOS:Hiphop and Idiot King. I don't like the way they each unvoted immediately when their votes were called into question, and how they didn't put any other votes down in place of them.
I do find both unvotes to be slightly scummy, like paradoxombie says.
Wow, didn't realize this initially. Definitely makes IdiotKing look scummier.DTMaster wrote:
I'm confused. Normally you would unvote when you see a bandwagon forming if you were part of that bandwagon. You voted for danks first though not jason.
1.) IK votes Dank for being FIRST PERSON to make a SECOND VOTE
2.) Jason wagon follows
3.) IK UNVOTESDank, not Jason. If you aren't voting the bandwagon, why unvote and comment on the bandwagon?
Does anyone else have a weird vibe about the exchange between Hiphop's 22 and IK's 23? Who does everyone think is wrong, in that exchange? Hiphop for the logic of his IK vote, or IK for his explanation?
1.) Don't call me a lurker. We are on page 3. Oh, and I despise lurkers as well.hiphop wrote:I believe they are just lurkers, and I despise lurkers. They make the game less fun for everybody else, and they hurt the side that they are with. Their posts no matter how small can give us more activity and more discussion. I am waiting for them to post, but that does not mean I won't be active in trying to locate the rest of the scum.
2.) I had a wedding this weekend. I also learned this past week that my Uncle and my GF's Uncle died. It's been a hectic few days, to say the least.
Good point. Hiphop is being fairly hypocritical.Paradoxombie about hiphop wrote:
You [Hiphop] were also quick to unvote. And you didn't give any explanation either. You say you want to give him a chance to answer, but I don't think that makes sense when you were already voting him for something else altogether.
Really? Worrying about L-4/L-3? It would be dumb for scum to jump on at that point, and get a quick lynch. We are sinking to a brand new low, people. Extremely scummy statement by hiphop trying to appear cautious.hiphop wrote:As for why I am not voting for him, it is because he already has two votes on him, and I don't want scum to pounce on him without giving himself a chance to defend for himself. As I already explained I didn't know he had three votes on him.
1.) You gave off the impression you were voting for jasont by mentioning the bandwagon. You make no transition/segway between your vote on danks and the bandwagon on jason, thus implying you are unvoting jason. Thus, we are confused why you would say the things about the bandwagon on unvote a random vote at the same post, with no transition between the two thoughts. Thus, what you intended the post to be is not clear, and thus it's weird you say it's exactly what you meant it to be.Idiotking wrote: And my wording in my original unvote post was exactly what I intended it to be. I saw a problem with a bandwagon forming, and so unvoted my random vote. My post makes sense in this context.
Who thought I was voting for jason instead of danks?
Umm, let's go back a few posts. You say:Idiotking wrote:What case could I possibly have? "A bandwagon was formed, and those 3 were part of it." That's all the information available; everything else that I can see could be explained away as being merely part of the RVS, as you say.So you say you were thinking about investigating the bandwagon, then later say the only information available is the bandwagon itself? So you admit that there is nothing to investigate, despite wanting to previously do it? Or is it that everything you could investigate is "part of the RVS?" and thus not readily able to be investigated? You seem to be contradicting yourself.Idiotking wrote:...and was considering investigating the bandwagon [voters on Jason]...
Shrine, in your post 46, where did you take DTM's quote from?
Hiphop continually trying to deflect.
So you would rather vote lurkers than "scum number 1?" Usually, when you admit that your vote on lurkers is a pressure vote to get them to post, it doesn't work. Pressure votes lose their luster when people know they are for pressure to post.hiphop wrote:Unvote
vote: ryan
@zach. It has only been a couple of days, not even half our required time. And that lurker is as suspicious as anyone else. I would of kept my vote on idiotking, but I dislike lurkers more.
Anyone else getting a weird vibe by this post. Sort of like, "If he is revealed as town, I told you it could of been lack of experience." Seems like a sort of fencesitting.Toro wrote:I'm considering on putting a vote on hiphop, but his lack of experience sort of is making me feel sympathetic and going against it. But you know what, after rereading his posts, I'm definitely not getting a real townly feeling from him, so...
Vote: hiphop
No. Good experienced scumbuddies would have harped you and pounced on you for your play in this game, not defended it, especially this early in the game. It would have been an extremely bad move for scumbuddies to do so.hiphop wrote: I must be scums greatest dream. I would think that if I was scum, my buddies would of defended of me, before this got out of hand.
Good God. You can count. Read above.hiphop wrote:
By the way Ryan still hasn't posted yet, and there is a little more than 12 hours left, I believe.
I could see both IK's and HipHops play as VI/newb/inexperience. IK, what is your level of experience?
DTM, you have read my meta? What games?
You continually outdo yourself, hiphop. Someone applauds you for lurker hunting, and you vote me, but before I even post, you unvote me. Seems fairly weird to unvote a "lurker" before he posts, especially when you are trying to lurker hunt.hiphop wrote:I will take my vote off of Ryan, because he is either going to be replaced, and I want to give the person who replaces him a chance, or he eventually will post anyways, and I will probably unvote then anyways.
hiphop wrote:
unvote
vote:Torojust a hunch right now may come back with reasons later.
1.) This early in a game, I have no problem with hunch votes, but hunches have reasons now? I thought hunches were gut feelings, without any reason?
2.) Voting someone and giving reasons later is scummy.
I would like my question to IK answered before I make my vote.