Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

hasdgfas · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 5:20 pm

vote: Empking

lynch quick gogogo

hasdgfas · Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:00 am

Why is Empking not dead yet?

hasdgfas · Post Post #23 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 11:53 am

Empking still isn't dead. Why aren't more people voting for him?

hasdgfas · Post Post #49 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:14 pm

dejkha wrote:Why don't you try to do both those things (posting more and having a more logical stance) as town? It can only help us...

^this

hasdgfas · Post Post #57 (isolation #4) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:25 pm

alexhans wrote:Also... Has anyone bothered to analize the game? It's a pretty anti-town setup...
if we mislynch day 1 there will be 4 vs 2. If they get their kill. 3 vs 2. Lylo. We can have a lylo in day 2. and we have a 5/7 of getting into that situation.

yep, old newbie setup, so we've gotta deal with that.

And also, it's not really a 5/7 chance because the chance changes as we decide who has done scummy things.

Also zwet is obvtown because he told us his scum meta is being logical, and telling us that is illogical

I also find it interesting the dejkha assumes the PRs will be killed. Why do you assume that?

hasdgfas · Post Post #59 (isolation #5) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:42 am

dejkha wrote:Because I'm scum and I know who the cop and doc are!!!!! Sorry guys, but you can't pin that one on me. Neither scum, nor town, have any idea who doc or cop is until they claim or are killed. So don't go trying to say I know who they are. I also say they would be killed because we have a 2/5 chance of one of them being killed. Hewitt, this isn't a perfect game and most aren't, so it's silly to assume the perfect scenario will play out.

I'll keep in mind how you tried to use that against me without reasoning though, Hasd. There's no way I could know who cop or doc are unless I am one. Which means, scum doesn't even know who cop or doc is. So trying to use that against me is quite the a stretch.

wow. I wasn't actually using against you. I was genuinely curious as to how you're so sure that they'll die.

hasdgfas · Post Post #79 (isolation #6) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:35 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Unvote; Vote: dejkha

WTF? You just blew a fuse there as if you were a nervous wreck about something!
Defensive much?

Defending yourself is a scumtell now?

hasdgfas · Post Post #109 (isolation #7) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:54 am

So what I'm getting from this is that zwet is being an idiot, Empking is active lurking(why haven't we lynched him yet), and dejkha is being attacked by zwet over something, but I don't know what that is. Have I missed something? Why isn't Empking dead yet?

hasdgfas · Post Post #154 (isolation #8) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:45 pm

so if the game continues the way it has, I'm going to have to be replaced. I will not play with people who act like this with each other.
I haven't posted because I don't want to get in the middle of this ridiculous argument. If I don't get some measure of assurance that we're through with that, I'm done.

hasdgfas · Post Post #158 (isolation #9) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:09 pm

dejkha wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:lurker lynches are typically policy lynches, dej.
They're really, really not. Policy lynches are more like you and Emp who are incapable of change how you play. Lurkers try to stay low while they don't have to and is an indication of scum.

zwet's a decent player, he just doesn't post walls.

Empking, on the other hand, doesn't post anything and needs to get lynched.

I haven't seen anything to comment on besides the infighting, which I'm not going to comment on because I'm trying to ignore it. Have you seen anything else important? Why doesn't anyone care that Emp hasn't said anything at all, and when I called him out on active lurking, he comes in and says "no I'm not"

hasdgfas · Post Post #162 (isolation #10) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:15 pm

hewitt wrote:Empking has posted today though and how come you responded twenty-nine minutes after your prod after being gone for so long? Coincidence or active lurking...it's one or the other.

what prod?

hasdgfas · Post Post #163 (isolation #11) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:16 pm

dejkha wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:Have you seen anything else important?
Yes, and I listed about 6 or 7, so should I assume you stopped reading altogether?

it all looks like the silly argument right now

hasdgfas · Post Post #165 (isolation #12) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:27 pm

dejkha wrote:Wow, it looks like you're refusing to see anything other than an argument or you haven't been reading. Either way, it's not good.

I'm sorry that everything looks like the argument. When that's all that's happened in the past 5 pages, that's what everything looks like. In a couple days, I should be able to look at everything, but I'm currently in the week of doom right now at school and don't really have time to look through everything. It's mostly skimming, and while skimming, it looks like argument.

hasdgfas · Post Post #169 (isolation #13) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:38 pm

hewitt wrote:
Empking wrote:
Mod; Prod on Has
please.

hasdgfas wrote:So what I'm getting from this is that zwet is being an idiot, Empking is active lurking(why haven't we lynched him yet), and dejkha is being attacked by zwet over something, but I don't know what that is. Have I missed something? Why isn't Empking dead yet?
So maybe you weren't prodded actually. But twenty-nine minutes after Empking asks that...you pop up.

29 minutes has NO significance at all. If it were three or five, I could understand, but 29? That's not that uncommon

hasdgfas · Post Post #225 (isolation #14) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:23 am

vote: wall-e

hasdgfas · Post Post #227 (isolation #15) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:12 am

He has posted next to nothing and what he did post was pretty much "posting to post".

hasdgfas · Post Post #256 (isolation #16) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:55 am

dejkha wrote:
Unvote Vote: Zwet

what is your reason for this?
It seems like OMGUS to me.

hasdgfas · Post Post #270 (isolation #17) » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:36 am

Wall-E wrote:
Unvote: Vote Zwetschenwasser

The game, in my opinion, begins with zwet flipping out, a scumtell imho, and then in post 188 some content appears (finally) but the major thing happening here is policy argument and lurker-discussion. My only comment is to say that I frequently use my votes for things other than lynching - pressure is mafia's engine of sorrow.

Zwet, what is up with the flip-out? I've never seen you lose your cool like that. You can consider this a meta-read vote on you if you can't explain it to me so that I can understand better. The outburst seemed uncalled-for.

why is flipping out a scumtell?
I consider it a frustration nulltell

hasdgfas · Post Post #307 (isolation #18) » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:18 am

hewitt wrote:Nice appeal to emotion.

Unvote: Wall-E

hewitt, why the heck did you unvote here? I don't see any reason for it.

hasdgfas · Post Post #310 (isolation #19) » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:40 am

hewitt wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
hewitt wrote:Nice appeal to emotion.

Unvote: Wall-E
hewitt, why the heck did you unvote here? I don't see any reason for it.
I don't really think he's scum.

and you're calling out his appeal to emotion? You can't have it both ways.

hasdgfas · Post Post #324 (isolation #20) » Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:13 pm

wall-e wrote:Just
know that I will kill you
or attack you in this game regardless of your answer.

hi scum

confirm vote wall-e

hasdgfas · Post Post #329 (isolation #21) » Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:26 am

hewitt wrote:I'm getting so sick and tired of being in a game where people don't explain their actions. If you're going to make an accusation, defend it. If you're going to vote, give a reason. Damn...

I GAVE A REASON.

Look at what I quoted. Look at it. I gave a reason. Freudian slip of massive proportions.

hasdgfas · Post Post #332 (isolation #22) » Sat Apr 11, 2009 6:43 am

Wall-E wrote:I meant what I said. If I'm scum, my friendship with someone will not stop me from killing them if I feel the need to. The same is true if I'm town. The point I was making was that friendship for me goes out the window within the context of this game, and please don't take it personally. If you are taking that as a slip, you're wrong. It was intentional and meant to describe my meta, nothing more.

I'm pretty sure friendship goes out the window in a game no matter what. That's completely a slip.

hasdgfas · Post Post #365 (isolation #23) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:56 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:APPEAL TO EMOTION!
Unvote; Vote: hewitt

what?

hasdgfas · Post Post #367 (isolation #24) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:04 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:Exactly!

zwet, what are you on right now? nobody understands what you are talking about except you, and I'm not even sure about that one.

hasdgfas · Post Post #398 (isolation #25) » Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:24 am

Wall-E wrote:I don't have to admit that I'm just as lost as everyone else. It's obvious from the fact that I'm town (empking logic lol)

This makes me even happier about my vote on you.

hasdgfas · Post Post #422 (isolation #26) » Thu Apr 16, 2009 1:46 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Wall-e is obvscum. Look at the way he's wording his posts!

Could you explain this? Or am I missing something obvious?

hasdgfas · Post Post #430 (isolation #27) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:06 pm

alexhans wrote:Emp still hasn't responded me. Has made poor judgements. I'm confortable with his lynch, really.

Is the second line talking about me or Emp? I can't tell at all.

hasdgfas · Post Post #432 (isolation #28) » Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:16 pm

alexhans wrote:Knowing that your name can be confusing I nicknamed you "hasd", never "has".
Anyway... you feel you made poor judgements?

no, and I was going to ask which ones you thought I made if it was about me.
Oh, and feel free to call me Cow or Hascow as that is my most used nickname here and people will know who you're talking about.

hasdgfas · Post Post #450 (isolation #29) » Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:00 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:dejkha and hascow.

good work at just ignoring wall-e

hasdgfas · Post Post #471 (isolation #30) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:55 am

Wall-E wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:dejkha and hascow.
good work at just ignoring wall-e
Care to build a case to support your vote?

I meant that post differently than you're taking it. I meant it as "Good work not paying attention to what wall-e was asking you" not "why don't you think wall-e is scummy?"

hasdgfas · Post Post #479 (isolation #31) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:10 pm

Wall-E wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Wall-E wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:dejkha and hascow.
good work at just ignoring wall-e
Care to build a case to support your vote?
I meant that post differently than you're taking it. I meant it as "Good work not paying attention to what wall-e was asking you" not "why don't you think wall-e is scummy?"
I'm going to keep the question on the table regardless. Or is that vote no longer valid?

ok, you decided to use AtE and also condemned someone for it. When the game first started you decided to just disappear(I'm not fully buying the watched topics thing, as you had posted after the game started)
Post 379 was ridiculous, if it took you that long to vote for dej based on something that I still don't fully understand.

hasdgfas · Post Post #488 (isolation #32) » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:14 pm

Is there a meta on zwet? You understand him?

hasdgfas · Post Post #493 (isolation #33) » Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:53 pm

wall-e, I still don't know why you're voting for zwet. Can you actually explain it please?

hasdgfas · Post Post #508 (isolation #34) » Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:32 am

unvote, vote Empking

Start playing the game.

hasdgfas · Post Post #512 (isolation #35) » Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:59 am

Empking wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote Empking

Start playing the game.
How am I not?

How are you? do what hewitt said and go find and quote five posts of you "playing the game"

hasdgfas · Post Post #547 (isolation #36) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:16 am

dejkha wrote:If someone else said it, I may've believed that, but since you said it, I highly doubt it. Not to mention it was a horrible trap because if he was fake claiming, his mind would have made him remember who he killed on night one (which there hasn't been yet).

so zwet can't do something useful? That's silly.

hasdgfas · Post Post #552 (isolation #37) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 10:10 am

dejkha wrote:He is. Your "trap" would've forced his mind, as a reflex, to instantly think back to what he did on Night 0 if it happened already. His intelligence has nothing to do with it, your "trap" was just stupid.

I've seen stupid scum before. You have to be patient with something that's obviously a trap.

hasdgfas · Post Post #558 (isolation #38) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:57 pm

dejkha wrote:No, just my invulnerability to you. You're not a threat to me because you never make points worth listening to before someone else makes them.

FoS: dejkha

Please explain what you are trying to do. I don't think any townie would call someone a "threat" to themselves.

hasdgfas · Post Post #583 (isolation #39) » Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:11 am

unvote, vote:dejhka

Claim please

hasdgfas · Post Post #594 (isolation #40) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:42 pm

Hi guys.

vote: empking

HoS: alex

let's start with lynching the known liar empking

hasdgfas · Post Post #597 (isolation #41) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:04 pm

alexhans wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:Hi guys.

vote: empking

HoS: alex

let's start with lynching the known liar empking
WAIT!!! WHAT?????
you vote out claimed cop? Our only innocent person??? And you Hand of suspicion me??? WHY??? How is Emp lying?

Here's a hint.

*claimed* cop.

hasdgfas · Post Post #601 (isolation #42) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:21 pm

vote: wall-e

hasdgfas · Post Post #604 (isolation #43) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:53 pm

hewitt wrote:Okay so what just happened, if scum won, say so now.

unvote, vote: wall-e

just in case

hasdgfas · Post Post #614 (isolation #44) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:11 am

dejkha wrote:Has was far from logical. I knew he was scum from the start, there was just too little to prove it. If I survived, I could've pointed out how he never unvoted after my claim, while he was still posting everywhere else for a full day or two.

There were less than 24 hours between your claim and the zwet lynch, you wouldn't have been able to get much from that.

hasdgfas · Post Post #617 (isolation #45) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:22 am

dejkha wrote:True, but you had quite a few posts around the site within the 22 hours that you had to check. I don't think town would ask for a claim and never come back to hear it. And almost every single one of your votes was a vote followed by 2 or 3 words. Never any reasons. I don't see how town never noticed this.

because that's all the entire town was doing.

I actually am very disappointed with my play this game

I'm usually better, but often get dragged into the crappy play I was doing when I feel I can get away with it, which is horrible. So I apologize to the rest of the game for that, as, scum or not, I should not be playing like that, even if it's happening often recently

hasdgfas · Post Post #618 (isolation #46) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:23 am

dejkha wrote:Your were the very definition of scum and
did just about every scumtell.

See, this is a problem, as "doing every scumtell" is really subjective, since different things are scummy when people do them.

hasdgfas · Post Post #620 (isolation #47) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:29 am

dejkha wrote:You stuck to the popular ones like lurking, not actually scumhunting (since you were scum, i mean it didn't look like you were), and hopping on every bandwagon, and without reason no less.

I don't think I would've guessed Alex unless we were alive in lylo, because that stunt he pulled before my lynch would be pointless for town.

they all had reasons, just not stated(which is what I would've said if I were called out on it)

hasdgfas · Post Post #628 (isolation #48) » Fri May 01, 2009 3:34 am

btw, I had great plans for that fake-counter-claim, and I had a good reason to wait as well.
The RB is not going to fakeclaim as they're the best thing the scum has going.
So don't counterclaim cop D1, as that makes you useless the rest of the game due to RB.
Plus, you have a chance to catch the other scum with your investigation on N1 to win the game from there. It made perfect sense in my head.