Open 124 (2:10 Bugs Bunny -- GAME OVER) before 761

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #38 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:53 am

Vote: Empking

We need MOAR Emp votes.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #40 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 10:56 am

Don't even ask that question.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #50 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:01 am

millar13 wrote:someone on a game I was briefly in, told me the best person to follow in day on is a guy called zwetchenwasser...and seeing as I am now in a game with hm

Unvote Vote: Empking

had to be done

OOH! Who? Who?

C:\>votecount

Running VoteCount^TM

Empking - 5 - roflcopter, dejkha, Cephrir, zwetschenwasser, millar13
millar13 - 3 - Zachrulez, madeofphail, Giuseppe
Grimmy - 2 - Grimmy, Empking

zwetschenwasser - 0
Pablo Molinero - 0
Giuseppe - 0
dejkha - 0
Zachrulez - 0
Cephrir - 0
roflcopter - 0
AndyTony - 0
madeofphail - 0

Not Voting: Pablo Molinero, AndyTony

With 12 players, it takes 7 to Lynch.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #54 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:03 am

Unvote

I don't like this L-1.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #227 (isolation #4) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:51 am

millar was too erratic to be left alive.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #246 (isolation #5) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:46 pm

I wasn't around to vote for him. I was posting in random games and I missed this one for around 2 days, which was enough to end his life. Emp, cut out the active lurking crap and you've got yourself a good case.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #254 (isolation #6) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:33 am

Cephrir is NOT active lurking. Andy, Empking needs to be lynched sometime during the game, in every game. Day 1 is usually the best day to take care of his perpetual annoyance.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #256 (isolation #7) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:40 am

Yes, it does help to find scum.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #258 (isolation #8) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:43 am

See the posts. There's a lot of proof.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #260 (isolation #9) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:49 am

The ones you quoted.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #265 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:45 am

Cephrir is taking the time to actually respond to Emp's crap. Just ignore him, and maybe he'll go away...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #268 (isolation #11) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:46 am

Emp is basing his conclusions off the last two pages.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #273 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:43 am

I've self-hammered as town. But maybe that's just my mixed up mind...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #290 (isolation #13) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:10 am

I still am open to Emp's case, as hammering comes under scrutiny in every game and Andy hasn't done a particularly good job defending his.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #339 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:22 am

Just out of curiosity, how old are you, Emp?

In other news, I don't want an Empking lynch to be solely a policy one. He hasn't make specific scummy statements, and therefore shouldn't be lynched yet.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #341 (isolation #15) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:26 am

But there's no solid case on him. Not one scumtell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #343 (isolation #16) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:32 am

? So... if everyone else thinks Emp is scum he MUST be scum? What are you trying to say?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #346 (isolation #17) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:08 pm

How does that dictate whether or not to lynch him?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #349 (isolation #18) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:18 pm

Who thinks you're scum?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #351 (isolation #19) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:22 pm

So you're communicating with your scum buddies, eh dej?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #353 (isolation #20) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:25 pm

"If you were scum...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #356 (isolation #21) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:43 pm

dej, it's a scumtell by association.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #358 (isolation #22) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:52 pm

It really is.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #361 (isolation #23) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:54 pm

Stop trying to distract us away from your scumminess.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #378 (isolation #24) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:18 am

Pablo, do you consider policy lynching Emp-town as something that should be condoned the next day?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #380 (isolation #25) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:35 am

Also, as I said, I'm just curious as to his age.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #382 (isolation #26) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:00 pm

Did you just claim cop/scum?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #385 (isolation #27) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:01 pm

Giuseppe, what do you mean by "confusion of his role"

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #387 (isolation #28) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:07 pm

I don't know whether to consider that a good thing or not...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #405 (isolation #29) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:03 am

Getting suspicion on them isn't a method of getting someone off L-1.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #409 (isolation #30) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:09 am

dejkha wrote:
Empking wrote:If Millar was my scum buddy then it would have been in this case.
I'd like to see what Zwet has to say about that.

WTF? If you see scumminess in a post you don't have to relegate responding to it to someone else. What the heck?!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #411 (isolation #31) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:31 am

And you dodge my observation...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #413 (isolation #32) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:50 am

It is a scumtell. And you ignore me again.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #416 (isolation #33) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:27 am

Because your dodge of it was scummier.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #418 (isolation #34) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:27 am

If you hadn't dodged it, I would have said something about it.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #420 (isolation #35) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:32 am

And you quickly twist my words.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #422 (isolation #36) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:30 am

Sorry, but your dodge was WAY scummier than Emp's scumtell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #440 (isolation #37) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:55 am

dejkha, you dodged responding to empking's scumtell. EMPKING DID SAY SOMETHING SCUMMY, BUT YOU NOT WILLING TO CALL HIM OUT ON IT IS A SCUMMIER SCUMTELL.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #442 (isolation #38) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:25 am

YES I WOULD HAVE BROUGHT IT UP. Where the hell did I say I wouldn't have brought it up?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #444 (isolation #39) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:33 am

I don't check all my games 24 hours a day, dej. You could have waited.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #446 (isolation #40) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:39 am

If you hadn't posted anything after Emp's post, I would have called him out on it.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #451 (isolation #41) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 4:17 am

Yes it is.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #535 (isolation #42) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:17 am

Vote: Empking

And so dies uselessness...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #543 (isolation #43) » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:43 pm

Pablo Molinero wrote:Dammit! Pull this win out, town. Do it for the Pablo!

If you weren't dead, this would be a scumtell.

Vote: dejkha

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #554 (isolation #44) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:06 am

dej has been completely useless and unhelpful and nasty.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #556 (isolation #45) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:18 am

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #565 (isolation #46) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:55 am

It was actually a test vote to see what dej responded to. He admitted to nastiness.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #568 (isolation #47) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:00 am

You don't know me very well, do you. That's not how I roll...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #571 (isolation #48) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:20 am

Deal with it. They're true.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #580 (isolation #49) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:55 am

Why is dejkha still alive? He tried to appease me by ^this^

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #582 (isolation #50) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:01 am

dejkha wrote:I understand your case, but the most I'll give him is an FoS for now.

Let's play "find the scumminess in this quote", shall we?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #587 (isolation #51) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:11 pm

He failed the test. Therefore, I vote him.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #592 (isolation #52) » Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:22 pm

dejkha wrote:I understand your case, but the most I'll give him is an FoS for now.

Here's some more blatant dej scumminess.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #600 (isolation #53) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:01 am

You've got to be smarter than this. Do you really not see the dej scumminess in the post?

C:\>votecount

Running VoteCount^TM

zwetschenwasser - 2 - Cephrir, AndyTony

madeofphail - 1 - dejkha
dejkha - 1 - zwetchenwasser

Cephrir - 0
AndyTony - 0
Giuseppe - 0
Grimmy - 0
Zachrulez - 0

Not Voting: Grimmy, Giuseppe, Zachrulez, madeofphail

With 8 players, it takes 5 to Lynch.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #602 (isolation #54) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:09 am

*sigh*

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #605 (isolation #55) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:13 am

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #608 (isolation #56) » Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:15 am

^blatant antitownness.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #643 (isolation #57) » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:29 am

I enjoy hammering.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #646 (isolation #58) » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:41 am

It's around half my explanation.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #649 (isolation #59) » Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:45 am

Emp's uselessness. I've said it before.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #652 (isolation #60) » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:16 pm

To Zach: Yes
To Andy: I'm not quite sure

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #665 (isolation #61) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:52 pm

Baaaa...