Mini Normal 2309 | Finished!

[Looker]

Hello, I'm here - is there anything I should know? Or are you willing to wait until I read all 46 pages? UNVOTE:

Spoiler:

[Looker]

Is it an African or European swallow

[Looker]

Also, is Naerys the only one who's claimed? Page 36 is a ways away.

[Looker]

VOTE: Hu Tao

[Looker]

They would be disappointing because I'm a liar: I said I would read and I haven't. I don't want to vote with iamveryhappy because they didn't assist my entrance into the game (nothing personal), so I'm voting against them. Political Clout at least told me what the claims were.

[Looker]

I'm quite literally a vote for hire - I can't believe no one wants a freebie.

[Looker]

They would be disappointing because I'm a liar: I said I would read and I haven't. I don't want to vote with iamveryhappy because they didn't assist my entrance into the game (nothing personal), so I'm voting against them. Political Clout at least told me what the claims were.

Don’t you mean Hu Tao?

Also it was me who you are referring to on the claims question, unless PC was in your PT. I also forgot to mention RNs claim at the time, ie- the proverbial elephant in the room.

I don’t care how scummy Greetings spot was, I’m willing to give Looker more time if he’s willing to put it in.

I won’t be voting for anyone besides PC.

iamveryhappy was voting Starfire, so I voted with Starfire (who was voting Hu Tao). It didn't look beneficial to start a wagon on iamveryhappy.

and yes, it was you, the orangutan - the adjective/noun names are throwing me off.

i agree with bob that the stalemate needs to be thrown off, and that's kind of what i was doing with my vote for hu tao.

[Looker]

Spoiler:

They would be disappointing because I'm a liar: I said I would read and I haven't. I don't want to vote with iamveryhappy because they didn't assist my entrance into the game (nothing personal), so I'm voting against them. Political Clout at least told me what the claims were.

Don’t you mean Hu Tao?

Also it was me who you are referring to on the claims question, unless PC was in your PT. I also forgot to mention RNs claim at the time, ie- the proverbial elephant in the room.

I don’t care how scummy Greetings spot was, I’m willing to give Looker more time if he’s willing to put it in.

I won’t be voting for anyone besides PC.

iamveryhappy was voting Starfire, so I voted with Starfire (who was voting Hu Tao). It didn't look beneficial to start a wagon on iamveryhappy.

and yes, it was you, the orangutan - the adjective/noun names are throwing me off.

i agree with bob that the stalemate needs to be thrown off, and that's kind of what i was doing with my vote for hu tao.

Ok, I see, why not vote for one of the leading wagons then? Might I suggest the one not on someone who has been gone for 5 days and is being replaced and who it isn’t even clear why anyone is voting for them.

I'm cool with voting a leading wagon, I just wanted to see the mindset/reaction of the vanity wagoners. Also the player that's not voting at all.

[Looker]

yeah that's why i initially didn't intend to follow through!

Who should we be voting? I'll follow you until the end.

[Looker]

Dannflor replaces Starfire. Please welcome them to the game!

Dannflor ran an awesome Purgatory game with amazing flavor

[Looker]

I haven't felt like this in a while. It feels good to feel something. Yimmy still hasnt voted and I wonder if the wagonomics argument is still in effect. Though that could be wifom. Is it likely that everyone would agree on scum last minute as an elim? Not that I'm defending my play but doesn't it seem convenient? No questions but a lot of votes?

[Looker]

This feels good, though. My pulse is quickening. How do I prove I'm town without fully reading through the thread? Is it even possible? It's exhilarating.

[Looker]

I'd rather do it by deadline. I just figured it'd be easy. Someone would say something, we would chat, and then I wouldn't have to read a bunch of old stuff. I really tried to cut corners by asking for a summary.

[Looker]

I even asked who I should vote. It's almost as if you guys don't want me.

[Looker]

And asking for a summary was supposed to generate discussion because there's the probability of people disagreeing on the sequence of events and subsequent interpretations. But IAVH stopped me with the "Read for yourself, nerd".

[Looker]

"Contentless void" is a bit dramatic. Have I been hammered yet?

[Looker]

And I wouldn't say 'arbitrary'. It made sense to me.

[Looker]

No, but it felt good to have anxiety again. I don't really get that in real life anymore. I wish I would've had time to make it back to my computer so I could actually analyze voting patterns instead of relying on phone, but I think this will keep me sated for a while.

[Looker]

Haha this is funny

[Looker]

I'm sorry! No redactions! Good game all!