Spoiler: STD
In post 345, Save The Dragons wrote:it's not necessarily whether you're apathetic or not, it's more of a vibe where i expect you to do more. i dunno it's possible uninvolvement isn't alignment indicative. i just felt like you made some nothing posts and i guess i'm trying to see where it comes from.In post 337, sheepsaysmeep wrote:wouldnt a mafia game where I was very present be what ur looking for here lolIn post 330, Save The Dragons wrote:can you link a recent town game?In post 224, sheepsaysmeep wrote:I think this is factually incorrectIn post 223, Save The Dragons wrote: i feel like town sheep is more present
viewtopic.php?t=91038 - last game we played together, town, I think I was very apathetic
viewtopic.php?t=91019 - town, apathetic
https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/th ... ur-Power-1 - mafia game, completely different site context, but I was in the top couple posters each day
I just think it's weird to suggest that my uninvolvement is alignment-related for me. I just find this game deeply unappetizing
i didn't really pay much attention to the game we just played together but i wanted town games to compare your town to this, i remember some of your recent scum games we've played together in.
let me think about it some, it doesn't seem like anyone else agrees so i'm gonna UNVOTE: for now.
Complaining about a player not doing much/feeling that they should do more is classic town!STD.
Spoiler: STD
In post 346, Save The Dragons wrote:In post 336, bob3141 wrote:Bellaphant
Doctor Drew
Random Nurse
bob3141
Dunnstral
Peregrine
Espeonage
Quiet Owl
Not_Mafia
sheepsaysmeep
Hu Tao
humaneatingmonkeyBellaphant - no change. nothing to really go off of.In post 335, Save The Dragons wrote:Bellaphant
Doctor Drew
Random Nurse
bob3141
Dunnstral
Peregrine
Espeonage
Quiet Owl
Not_Mafia
sheepsaysmeep
Hu Tao
humaneatingmonkey
Dr Drew - went from scum to lean scum. I guess it's just a vibe i was fooled by Dr. Drew in Boons ahoy and i want to be wary of the slot so i'm leaning scum more than i normally would but it's not really predicated on anything other than i'd like to see more from him.
Random Nurse - no change. just seems townie i've liked their pushes they're hunting.
bob3141 - went from scum to null. I'm a little worried about their seeming obsession with me and would like more from them on other slots. i think my scumread was preliminary and some posts pinged me a certain way but i don't remember exactly what so i'm comfortable putting bob in the null area
Dunnstral - went from town to null. my townread was premature. i think dunnstral being engaged is something that could be town indicative but dunnstral's kind of fell off so i don't really know.
Peregrine - went from null to lean town. I think this one is entirely a vibe thing, peregrine barely posted when i made the initial list (I think) and so i put them as null. seeing their posts since then makes me not want to strike there.
Espeonage - I've already discussed.
Quiet Owl - changed from lean town to lean scum. i don't remember exactly why i town read them. their recent posting has not been great. too defensive, too little.
Not_Mafia - no change, i think i can sometimes read not mafia but i'm not there yet.
sheepsaysmeep - went from null to scum. i've gone in depth on this.
hu tao - null to lean town. Went from little posts to more posts. i'm not sold but i'm feeling okay with hu tao, seems a lot like how they behaved in the past two games i played with them where they were town.
humaneatingmonkey - null to lean town. i guess i wasn't really sure where i felt in the first list but by the second list i felt more comfortable with the slot, i believe that hem believes in their conviction. i think they're wrong about espe but i believe they are uninformed towards espe's alignment.
This is the only post of his that gives me pause since it's giving me war flashbacks to Fuzzy Friends Coalition. I don't have a substantial reason for feeling this besides a sinking feeling in my gut; I don't think it's even based on tone, it's just a vibe. But everything else I've seen from his ISO pings townie so idk, it's not really something I want to pursue.
Spoiler: Hu Tao
In post 270, Hu Tao wrote:VOTE: owlIn post 264, Quiet Owl wrote: VOTE: Hu Tao
would like to see more from them. perhaps their thoughts on drew?
I've barely posted in the past 3 or 4 days and still have more posts than you but your reasoning for voting me is 'wanting to see more' sure. This seems like you just noticed me saying I'd catch up later and wanted a reason to vote someone
In post 405, Hu Tao wrote:Suspicious post. Reads as someone that is upset that someone they know is town is being townread unrighteously. How about instead of saying why I'm not town for those posts, explain why I'm mafia?In post 393, Dunnstral wrote: I don't see how people are reading Hu Tao's recent posts as town. Basically all they did is defend themselves against suspicion and vote the person who voted them. I mean, maybe that doesn't make them mafia, but how are people going from null to town?
In post 422, Hu Tao wrote:How do you think I'd act then if it would be noticeableIn post 421, Save The Dragons wrote:i feel you'd be different in a noticeable wayIn post 406, Hu Tao wrote:So you're saying that you think I'd be uncapable of doing this as scum? If so, what would be hard to replicate?In post 404, Save The Dragons wrote:because this is exactly how they behaved in previous games with them when they were townIn post 393, Dunnstral wrote: I don't see how people are reading Hu Tao's recent posts as town. Basically all they did is defend themselves against suspicion and vote the person who voted them. I mean, maybe that doesn't make them mafia, but how are people going from null to town?
In post 588, Hu Tao wrote: Is vig this common on this site? I swear every game I've been in has one good work though
I felt meh about Hu Tao early on but these posts won me over. They feel like they come from an overtly townie perspective that would be hard to make as scum, not because they're particularly hard posts to fake but because I don't think scum is likely to think of faking this perspective. Though, the last quote in particular is admittedly very easy to fake but I think the emotion there is genuine.
Spoiler: Owl
In post 186, Random Nurse wrote:So, reading this, I'm interpreting this as a deflection, because you didn't actually respond to my question about what you meant by him being "fine." I'd like you to simply explain what you meant instead of not actually answering me.In post 37, Quiet Owl wrote:oh that's a good logical post, this'll be a fun game. was getting really tired of having to read through walls of fluff in other ones.In post 24, Random Nurse wrote:In post 19, Quiet Owl wrote:the man-eater is fine. it is odd to see a wagon form on page one though, and particularly odd that you took that so personally so quickly. why is your immediate response an attempt to discredit me and then deflect my point by misinterpreting it?In post 18, Random Nurse wrote:Do you think page 1 *wagons* are serious?
What I do wonder is why you appear concerned for humaneatingmonkey.
Guess I'm trying to parse through what you mean by he's "fine."
Doesn't sound like you've been playing that long if you think three same votes on page 1 is odd, tbf.
What does kind of ping my radar is you saying it was taken personally—could you share where, because this does sound like you're adding something that isn't there.
Again, it seems like you're adding things by saying I'm attempting to discredit you. Three same votes on page 1 does not a wagon make, and they are rarely if ever serious.
And what I said to you, Sir, is that it appears to me that you are concerned over HEM's safety. That's just how it seems to me so if you react defensively I can't help that.
"what you mean by he's "fine."" my lawyer has advised me not to comment further. he's me in a suit. he's demanding a raise. our budget doesn't allow for this. he may go on strike halfway through the game
"taken personally, you're adding something that isn't there" that's true actually. mostly, my original post wasn't directly addressed at anyone, so i wasn't expecting it to get jumped on that fast. pleasant surprise that it did
"attempting to discredit you" did not like the tone of "Do you think page 1 *wagons* are serious?". seemed more like "hey this post is 100% definitely silly and irrelevant, trust me and ignore it immediately" to me rather than "this is a flawed and suspicious assumption". the first is a lot more scum-typical.
"concerned over HEM's safety" more focused on poking people over votes at the moment. way more interesting. occasionally things explode!
Just so we're on the same page, I was responding to you saying that I had taken something personally, where nothing of the sort was in any of my prior four posts. When you ascribe things to me in your opinion that didn't actually happen, it does make me stop and question why you would add things that weren't there.
Could you please clarify the part in yellow so I don't misunderstand you?
As I see it, I saw it more as being concerned that someone had 3 votes on page 1, and that Scum tend to be more concerned with self-preservation. 3 votes for the same person on page 1 isn't uncommon, and I don't think it's worth worrying about an immediate lynch at the very start of the game over that. The apparent concern (at least as I saw it) worried me a bit more, because it smelt a bit like trying to protect someone else.
After Nurse's flip I think this spewed Owl as town. I also liked how they tried to parse Espeon VS HEM, it felt unbiased and like they were genuinely trying to figure out whatever the hell was going on between those two. Norwe has also been super townie immediately after replacing in and I feel comfortable locking in this slot as town. With the Strongman dead, one of the Bodyguards should be on this slot at all times.