I'm Announcing Roaming Watcher.In post 1614, redFF wrote: ok, freedom next
It depends on the cause but if it's due to the Loyal part of your role, it would show up.In post 1690, Firebringer wrote: do failed actions show up as motion?
Sure.In post 1692, Firebringer wrote: Freedom watches me
Herta motion detects me
I visit random person
if the ninja exists this doesn't prevent my death but would at least confirm that herta isn't a ninja
It feels less risky though.In post 1701, Firebringer wrote: no, we aren't doing ur plan.
we get way more info doing other way around.
if scum go for kill on redff thats fine with me i get a free check, i doubt it i think i get killed.
But targetting redff with watcher/motion is pointless.
I skimmed through the game prior to rep in and Klick felt pretty Town.In post 1709, redFF wrote: freedom why did you target klick, any particular reason?
True.In post 1734, Shirou wrote: That's...in fact 14 people, so there's gotta be scum in the PRs no matter what if Andante/me are both town. Even if we try to assume both Kowah and PP are scum, it still gives us that there's at least one scum in the PRs
I answered in 1719.In post 1738, Andante wrote: Hey Freedom, what made you watch Klick last night?
Are you suggesting we eliminate in VTs instead?In post 1742, Andante wrote:why do we HAVE to lim in PRs? This feels like an odd way to start the day, like "here's the claims" "ok now we HAVE to lim in the PRs"In post 1731, Shirou wrote:I'm sorry but there'sIn post 1727, redFF wrote: feel like its penguin or kow for lim todaywe aren't limming in the PRs. It can't be all town. It's literally a broken setup no matter how much you try to balance if those claims are all town.no way
It's a question of who is lying to me...
His posts felt genuine and conveyed an intention to scumhunt.In post 1741, Andante wrote:What about Klick felt particularly town? It's easy to look at a dead town and call them obv town, I'd like more on this, since it sounds like Klick was your *strongest* TR??In post 1740, Freedom wrote:I answered in 1719.In post 1738, Andante wrote: Hey Freedom, what made you watch Klick last night?
I don't think I've ever said I'm unwilling to vote VTs?In post 1746, Andante wrote:I’m suggesting that we don’t focus solely on claims, but rather how these people have been playing, my gut reaction is “cool, just ignore PRs, they’ll sort themselves out” I just find it odd others are having the gut reaction of “MUST LIM IN PRS TODAY” like hello? if this ninja does exist, do we really think it’s an existing PR claim? “hello I’m ninja and I announce my visits!!” cause our watcher is useless if we have a ninja, I’m surprised you’re supporting the lim in PRs cause you’re the only one ninja is confirmed to? like based on your reply to me you don’t seem interested limming in VTs?In post 1743, Freedom wrote:Are you suggesting we eliminate in VTs instead?In post 1742, Andante wrote:why do we HAVE to lim in PRs? This feels like an odd way to start the day, like "here's the claims" "ok now we HAVE to lim in the PRs"In post 1731, Shirou wrote:I'm sorry but there'sIn post 1727, redFF wrote: feel like its penguin or kow for lim todaywe aren't limming in the PRs. It can't be all town. It's literally a broken setup no matter how much you try to balance if those claims are all town.no way
It's a question of who is lying to me...
Because you know that at least one PR has to be scum if Shirou and you are trueclaiming.
I saw Herta visit you but I didn't get a notification saying you visit me.In post 1903, Firebringer wrote: popcorn to next either freedom or kowah
I'm a Watcher but I agree with the first paragraph. We've been clearing people, assuming either scum didn't lie about getting visited or Firebringer actually is Loyal and not trying some gambit.In post 1970, Kowahbunga wrote: I just realized that I have no idea if Fire is actually even telling the truth about his role. So I can no longer just assume he was actually loyal. I only know whatever he is is loud.
Freedom, did Fire visit me?
Agreed.In post 2046, PenguinPower wrote:This requires Fire/Shirou both being scum or Fire being scum and so wasn't applicable to the scenario that was being discussed.In post 2045, Kowahbunga wrote: If any of fire's results are shady it's the result on Shirou who he practically walked to an answer.
I think you're confusing what Enchant said with the modifier.In post 2068, Kowahbunga wrote: Okay this is probably pretty late in the game for me to be wondering this. I've taken the advice of reading the first post. Is "Complex" actually something changing the game somehow? Because I just took it as a boring adjective and literally that Enchant was just saying "hey my game is going to be hard" - but I noticed it was capitalized in the first post... So I just happened to see if it meant something in the wiki... And that term has a page in the wiki.
So, like, is that changing something in the game? Would people be flipping with the word "complex" in their role, or is it applied to everyone? Or was I actually right and the game is just meant to be difficult?
Also, 6 deaths, 1 VT among them.. 5 town powers dead in an 11 player game.
I feel like an idiot for not reading the first post now.
TBH I was surprised that most people didn't publicly question if I made up Ninja. It was the first reasonable thing that I thought of that made sense with a Town Watcher.In post 2230, Firebringer wrote: I don't know how ninja was easily believed i even said in PT that i didn't like going with this true claim that freedom wanted because just admitting u went to the person who died place is like.....ballsy.