Mini Normal 2232 -ENDGAME
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
VOTE: MargotRosa
Why the self-vote?
What if I don't eat breakfast?In post 22, Nixie wrote:Let me know what you eat for breakfast, as that will form the basis of my scumhunting.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
But the sacred rules of RVS say that you must vote someone else to try to read their reaction and immediately start solving the game. It's not a weird question.
Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Who's the "our mob"?In post 39, geraintm wrote:anyone know if our mob does this sort of thing on a regular basis?Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
In theory, at least. Debatable how well it accomplishes that in practice. Does the response tell you anything?In post 46, Kazyan wrote:Is that was RVS is supposed to do? Huh. Fair, then. I haven't noticed reactions to RVS-voting someone being important, but apparently, voting for myself can get a response too.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83755In post 45, geraintm wrote:yes, moderator, sorry typed too quickly. like, i know what an innocent child is but a day zero one i've not seen before. it is unusual enough that i wondered if the moderator was known for weird roles
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82764
Skimming through our moderator's topics, I found his last two Normal games had a d1 Innocent Child. Though I'm sceptical on how much value we get from discussing this in depth right now.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Says the person Townreading me for my breakfast choice.In post 60, Nixie wrote:This is also a bad post. Arbitrary townread here is bad juju.
I was about to type out the above question on why Alice didn't think I was distancing, so yeah, interested in that answer. Agreed that Kyouko is giving me Townie vibes, 69 is something similar to what I felt about Margot's entry.
I find Alice's 62 a bit weird. I don't think their Townread on me is objectively good (I don't think pulling out some links to the moderator's past games is outside what I would do as scum), but it seemed genuine enough. However, 62 feels weirdly defensive? I guess it strikes me as odd that they would be calling for being disproven by my meta when they've never played with me before, and when my account has one completed game.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoon
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoon
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
It didn't seem random, considering it was made after some discussion and after you quoted post from Kyouko.In post 96, geraintm wrote:It was a random vote, done same way I do every game.
No, they said they have a role, not necessarily a power one. Learn to read.In post 121, geraintm wrote:Then game isn't balanced.kayzan has already said they have a PR
I hate a lot of what geraintm has posted so far. However, it feels almost too blunt to be coming from Scum. It could be refuge in audacity, but I somehow feel it's more likely geraintm here genuinely thinks he's helping the Town by discussion the Innocent Child and keeping track of claims and whatnot. This play coming from scum would have to be some major playing dumb. Anyone have experience with Scum!geraintm and whether he's capable of this?
That said, please do the note taking about roles in private. Calling out potential power role softs to the whole thread (including Scum) is a horrible way to play Town.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
VOTE: Ythan
I'm not sure I like Ythan's entrance into the game. Most of his posting so far focuses on geraintm, and it feels like he's purposefully trying to paint his posts in a scummy manner. 131 seems to be doing that, and I'm not sure I'd expect 136 from Town. The explanation for geraintm's fixation on the Innocent Child seems reasonable to me, and Ythan plainly dismissing it makes me think Ythan might be Scum attacking the Townie that's doing silly things.
I am also getting scumpings on one other person, though I'd like to see them post more before I say something.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
They said they had a role. That doesn't imply it's a power role.In post 92, Kazyan wrote:though I'm still kinda in the phase where I only know anything about Jolyne's role and my role.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Nothing positive, and I've already made it clear that I dislike what he's doing. But just because someone's doing something that isn't pro-Town, doesn't mean that they themselves aren't Town, and geraintm strikes me as a Townie who would definitely be capable of doing something like this, especially coupled with the fact he was just a Day 3 IC in a game.In post 157, Ythan wrote:
What purpose do you think his line questioning was intended to serve from a town perspective?In post 141, Nathann wrote:VOTE: Ythan
I'm not sure I like Ythan's entrance into the game. Most of his posting so far focuses on geraintm, and it feels like he's purposefully trying to paint his posts in a scummy manner. 131 seems to be doing that, and I'm not sure I'd expect 136 from Town. The explanation for geraintm's fixation on the Innocent Child seems reasonable to me, and Ythan plainly dismissing it makes me think Ythan might be Scum attacking the Townie that's doing silly things.
I am also getting scumpings on one other person, though I'd like to see them post more before I say something.
I'm sure you know that anti-Town behaviour =/= Scum, so I'm kind of raising an eyebrow at your response to me here.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Do you have really low expectations for Scum's ability to do theatre? Their conversation seemed like boring meta blabber to me. Why does it give you the impression that it's difficult to fake, more than anything else we've seen in the game so far?In post 165, Kazyan wrote:Thinking about recent interactions, though, I'm pretty sure the scumteam can't be Dwlee+Ythan, actually, since I have a hard time seeing this whole conversation as distancing. So if Dwlee were to flip red, I'd give Ythan a huge pile of towncred, or vice versa, but that's thinking so far ahead that it's not super helpful.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Did I strike a nerve? Yes, I figured you know that, which is why your retort of "what's the purpose from a Town POV?" makes me wary. I get that he was sticking out, but it looked like sticking out in a Townie manner.In post 171, Ythan wrote:I know anti town behavior isn't automatically scum you clown but it's the best thing I have to go on right now and it does stick out to me more than anything else going on.
I'm not saying I think they're Scum together, I was just pointing out that the interaction didn't seem like anything too difficult to fake.In post 174, Kazyan wrote:but if it's actually consistent with 'typical' scum theater, then that's more interesting.
Kazyan, I noticed that you were focusing a lot on potential team reads (202, 198, 165). Is this something that you usually do? Oh, regarding your Dwlee read, what gave you the feeling of opportunism regarding their interaction with Ythan?Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Ahaha, I love the paranoia when I haven't even done anything yet. Do you have a read on Kazyan outside of 64?In post 182, Andresvmb wrote:Anyway, I’m going to say Kazyan is Town. So perhaps let’s not execute there. Nathann is maybe Town but probably too early for that read and seems competent.
I don't see the issue in both recognizing that a typo was made and what it was supposed to say, and theorizing that the typo was maybe done on purpose as a Traitor crumb. And I'm kind of weirded out at your question later that Dwlee should've made a distinction between the two paragraphs. Do you think Dwlee is scummy for not having done that?In post 214, Andresvmb wrote:Writing down that a typo (which really is the simplest explanation since someone else immediately interpreted it that way before the clarification came) was actually a Traitor crumb is arealstretch.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
The readslist is as fine as a page 6 readslist can be. Interesting definitely, though I'd be lying if I said it makes me lean one alignment over the other.In post 250, Andresvmb wrote:
Their readslist seemed fine, but I do agree with (I think it was) you when you pointed out that the vote didn’t match the strongest SR. That seemed interesting.In post 245, Nathann wrote:Do you have a read on Kazyan outside of 64?
Anyway, the reason I ask. Kazyan is the person I was getting scumpings on earlier. Things like responding with "good point" when there was no point made (46) or pointing out how there's not enough info for them to do anythingwhilethere was somewhat productive discussion happening around the (92) pinged me the wrong way. Readlist was okay, and I disliked the focus on teamreads rather than individual reads, as that feels like an easy way to stay busy while not actually helping. The explanation for that in 257 is okay, I guess.
The reason I out this now is because I realize I'm slowly getting tunnelled on that read, and could probably use a sanity check. And you were the only one (I think) to express a read on them earlier, and I'm gonna cheat slightly and sheep our IC's read on you for the time being, so. What do you think?
Of course, others' takes also welcome.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Don't think I'm gonna agree. I can see where you're coming from, and if I think about it a bit more, I can see the backpedalling of "it was only the first paragraph" as Scum caught in a shallow read. But I think it's just as likely that that was Town!Dwlee who thought of the first paragraph as Townie, and didn't bother to specify which part of the post they were referring to. And having skimmed that part of their ISO and not seeing evidence of them calling the second paragraph Townie then backpedalling (and since I already had some Townie gutpings on Dwlee), I'm gonna go with the latter.In post 252, Andresvmb wrote:I think it’s Scummy that DW called a whole post Towny thoughts, was challenged on the content of the post they said contained a Towny thought process (even though clearly they don’t think all of the content makes sense), and then narrowed the scope of their comment to the first paragraph when the second paragraph clearly follows from the first (and said the second paragraph was NAI). What I guess I’m saying is that we could be seeing fake reasoning for a read (that I think is correct, funny enough). It just seemed like a really superficial read to me.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I am kind of inclined to Townread this, considering this is something I often feel. Easily faked, but does Scum think to fake it...In post 257, Kazyan wrote:Still, Dwlee is currently one of those cases where the evidence seems to point to scum, so that's where I should vote...but for whatever reason, my heart isn't in it.
Heh.In post 269, DkKoba wrote:I'm not accepting criticism.
I'd be lying if I said I fully get why the reaction of "what if Traitor" is a Towntell while assuming three Scum isn't, but I don't plan on arguing about it for now.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I skipped over this - I dunno, he just gives me the vibe of a Townie doing dumb things not caring how he looks. I assume Scum would probably be aware that openly speculating on the IC and listing claimed roles repeatedly will do nothing but potentially piss people off and bring heat his way. And considering geraintm said himself (or has it been mentioned by Andres? I don't care enough to go back to look) that he's not a strong player Day 1, doesn't that just unnecessarily increase the odds he gets yeeted?In post 251, Ythan wrote:
Don't see what you're seeing.In post 243, Nathann wrote:I get that he was sticking out, but it looked like sticking out in a Townie manner.
Obviously it could be a bluff by Scum, but that requires a bit higher level of play that my gut tells me he's not playing on here. Which, again, if there's evidence to geraintm playing this way on Day 1 as Scum, I'm open to reconsideration. I am getting kind of worried about him being gone anyway, but I'm not sure if I should actually be expecting anything.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Could you elaborate on why you think this?In post 293, DrippingGoofball wrote:Andres is scum.
I dislike 369 from GrandpaMo. Ythan's 354 is as bland of a reaction as it can be that shows no deeper thought process whatsoever. (No, I'm not calling Ythan scum because of it.) To then have GrandpaMo Townread it because the post was confusing and only Town would react with confusion on a confusing post is... No. I'd maybe understand if Ythan showed some nuanced thought about it, but he didn't, so GrandpaMo's Townread there feels really forced.
DGB/Jolyne spat feels more like personalities / playstyles clashing than anything I could draw alignment info out of. This is me explicitlynotimplying that I Townread DGB. Though I think it would be a good idea to chill out for a second, because I have a feeling it's likely the two of you argue regardless of DGB's alignment, and in... 9 out of 11 times, that's going to be strictly counter productive.
And geraintm's 434 and 435 make my head hurt. Is anyone gonna bother explaining how no-yeeting means we lose an elimination, and why that's a bad thing, especially in a game like this where Town power will likely be very low?Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Alice gives me vague Townie pings, they seem genuine enough, I don't notice an obvious agenda, and they seem similar enough to another Town game I skimmed.
Do you have any updated thoughts on this?In post 247, AliceK wrote:I will keep my vote where it is.
@Jolyne, I don't want you to have to do my homework, but I'm not sure I see whatever you see with them. Would you be willing to help out?Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I'm blind apparently, what was it?In post 440, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Also surprised nobody has commented on his slip yetOnce again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
You could try presenting your view of the game and showing us a thought process instead of just crying about it?In post 456, GrandpaMo wrote:
ok cool everyone wants to vote me but like only 2 ppl have gave a reason on why im scum. and one of that person had weak reasoning.In post 439, Nathann wrote:I'd want to vote in [GrandpaMo, Ythan]. Nullish pile that I wouldn't mind voting in is [Nixie, DGB, Enchant]. Not a scumread but wouldn't mind voting for other reasons is [geraintm]. Anyone else I would need to see some good arguments.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I did skim through your ISO, I found a few reads scattered around that I felt weren't explained properly. I wouldn't have asked otherwise.In post 464, GrandpaMo wrote:i have multiple times... just iso me dude.
Also, re Kyouko's 462, wow. It's quite possible I was one of the views, because I'm often around to open the game when there's a new post, but I don't always feel like responding immediately. Which leads me to the next question - even if he was one of the views there without posting, what implication does that have on his alignment?Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Do you respond to those who do actually ask something of you?In post 486, Enchant wrote:It's not like you want to ask something from me, or so on.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Judging by Andres's 485, it looks like Scum!Enchant does verbally shrug a lot.In post 496, Kazyan wrote:I asked about random-ass people to throw Enchant off-script, but the Nixie read seems genuine; if scum were just playing it cool and trying to give real responses, they wouldn't verbally shrug like that.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Considering it's about ~3 days left on the clock in a relatively low active game with prod timers being 48 hours, you being in the game for about 18 hours now, actively posting but none of it being of any worth or substance... The answer to that question by your actual play is that you're not doing anything. So I'm gonna ask. Either you say right away you're not gonna do anything so we can kill you immediately, you make false promises and we kill you after a few days of prodging, or you actually do something.In post 502, Enchant wrote:This question can be answered by actual playOnce again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Andres, I believe 512 is aimed at me, considering the very creative jab at my avatar.
First, I'm not the Town leader, but I'm sure not going to sit by and wait for the IC to magically solve the game for us.
Second, I cannot tell between Scum lurksacks and Town lurksacks, that's the problem. You cannot be read if you're not doing anything. However, if you think that me not voting you at this time makes me Scum, go ahead and push me, see how well that ends for you.
Third, sure, I cannot force you to be active. Don't be surprised if you get yeeted as a consequence of being an unreadable mess, though.
This is where I will most likely stop engaging, both for my own peace and the thread's.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Also, Andres, thanks for the ISO. From the time I asked till now, my read on Kazyan went to "don't want to murder them right now, but will keep an eye out" by itself, but I do appreciate the effort, especially as it makes me think you're Town further.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Yes, that's the whole point. The "you're not the Townleader" line annoyed me.In post 523, Jolyne wrote:its kinda impossible for me to "solve the game" for town if town doesn't act on their own accord/present their own opinions so.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Okay, because I am somewhat bored and sleep is for the weak, I'm gonna look over GrandpaMo's ISO. I want to see every single instance of him actually giving a read, because the "lol I gave reads just ISO me dude" is annoying me and I want to see if I'm blind or not.
Spoiler: all of the reads he's given so far
The contents of the spoiler:
- Nixie is Town for Townslipping.
- geraintm was declared Scummy because of thread movement, only to then walk back on that read due to remembering there's only 2 Scum.
- Andres is Townie because of 192.
- Kyouko is Townie because of 200.
- geraintm is null/Scum due to there possibly being Scum between him and DGB. (?)
- Ythan is Town because of 354.
- And Scumreading Kazyan for 540 (and their bad read on him).
So, Nixie/Andres/Kyouko are Town because of extremely simple reasoning, Ythan is Town for very bad reasoning (see my 436). I'm assuming the Scum between geraintm/DGB stems from 320, which is questionable. And the Scumread on Kazyan is fine, though again, nothing spectacular.
At 464, when I ask him to present his thought process for us to read, he claims done it multiple times. At that point, I couldn't remember him actually going into anything (other than the Ythan read, which I'm sure you get by now that I hated), I thought maybe I skipped over stuff. Now I don't think I have.
Anyway, I find it Scummy that GrandpaMo's first reaction to people scumreading him is to complain how people are Scumreading him for bad reasons, surface level logic, he's not efforting yet, etc, but when you look at what analysis GrandpaMo has actually done in this game, it's... next to nothing. And when he actually gets asked to present the thoughts, it's "I have them in my ISO". Where?
As I am typing this, I am getting a bad gut feeling that this is a Townie who actually thinks they're being super Townie and acting accordingly, but uh. I don't think I can be playing this game on unfounded gut feelings when his ISO gives me a strong vibe of Scum not doing anything and drowning the thread in bloat.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Now, onto Part 2... What the hell is Kazyan doing.
Kazyan's mentions of GrandpaMo, prior to this little spat, are: 46 (having a good point), 149 (gut scumlean), 478 (willing to yeet, no explanation), 525 (badposting). A pretty much consistent scumread, never any elaborate explanation given for it.
Looking at their ISO of GrandpaMo (552) - Why is giving a simple read on Nixie Townie? (Yes, I know you wrote a comment how Scum probably lets a comment like that slide, so I guess my question then is, do you expect scum to be doing nothing? Or, what's the line between something Scum would or wouldn't let slide? There's probably no correct answer to this, but I wanna see some sorta thought process here.) Why is setup speculation Townie?
Regarding you Townreading his 369, could you give me your opinion on the second paragraph of my 436?
And, probably the question I care about the most - why were you consistently Scumreading GrandpaMo in the first place? I don't care if you changed your mind in the meantime or whatnot, because this shift feels extremely weird. Maybe I'm biased in thinking that GrandpaMo isn't Townie, I could be. But I don't know if I find your current thought process regarding him to make any sense whatsoever.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I'll point out that I haven't technically read his ISO, I was just skimming for him giving reads and singling those instances out. I went over it two times, so I don'tthinkI missed any, but I am working with some sleep deprivation so do yell at me if I'm wrong. I did not take in any of the other posts, but my post wasn't a commentary of his ISO as a whole anyway.
I wish I could present a definite answer, and I know hedging is generally frowned upon, but I'd be lying if I didn't point out that the thought did occur to me.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
So, if you're not paying attention, those posts make you scumread a person, but when you reread, you found them NAI, did I get that right? Why do you no longer find it Scummy then?In post 566, Kazyan wrote:Why were you consistently Scumreading GrandpaMo in the first place?Fluffy posts. Short, snippy, "active lurking" without any particularly hot takes. Those are the kinds of things that make an impression on me when I'm not really paying attention.
---
Could you give me your opinion on the second paragraph of my 436?I think it's circular, in describing the post as "confusing". You say the following: "ecause the post was confusing and only Town would react with confusion on a confusing post is... No." This assumes that the confusingness of the post in question is self-evident, but GMo wouldn't think his own post was like that, because he's the one who made it and he understands his own thoughts.
And I'm not sure if you got what I'm saying here. Or maybe I don't get your reply. I know GrandpaMo wouldn't think of his own post like that. However, my issue is that he uses someone else's confusion at his post to Townread them. Ythan's reaction was basically "wtf", and GrandpaMo declared that reaction as Townie because "only town would react in a way where they thought the way i said was weird." I get the feeling there's something off about thinking that only Town would react with confusion at a confusing post.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
And now the more I stare at 369, the more I think that maybe,maybeGrandpaMo's reaction makes sense from Town because he's calling on a mindmeld. But Ythan's reaction is so plain and that is such an obvious confusing post, anyone could've called it out... Yeah, I'm gonna stop thinking about this for the night. This has somehow made me wanna yeet Ythan again.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
My main issue was that his scumread of geraintm felt opportunistic to me. I got a strong gut feeling that geraintm was a Townie who was tripping over his own words, and that made me see Ythan as scum that's trying to take advantage of anti-Town behaviour.In post 583, Andresvmb wrote:@Nathann I read Ythan’s ISO (it’s short). I don’t know Ythan’s meta, but I’ll say this - I don’t see them as Scum here. It’s early, the takes are dry, but they seem unconcerned about how others perceive them and seem genuine to me. Not rock solid, can be faked, and I don’t trust all my early reads. But at a gut level, seems like Town.
I know that's not foolproof, but /shrug. I don't have much else, as the rest of his posts don't sway me one way or another, at least not from memory.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I won't say it isn't. I started thinking whether GrandpaMo's reaction to your post actually made sense from a Town perspective or not, which made me think of that post of yours, which then made me think back to our spat early game and how I hadn't noticed anything Townie from you in the meantime.In post 590, Ythan wrote:
This may sound self serving coming from me but that's sure and odd conclusion to draw after the rest of your post (which I snipped out to highlight the specific part I'm referring to)In post 573, Nathann wrote:This has somehow made me wanna yeet Ythan again.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Okay, then please quote where you have explained your logic. But in a way that's deeper that "*quotes a random post* - this is a Townie thought process". Because I went looking for your reads specifically yesterday, I didn't find much.In post 608, GrandpaMo wrote:Naathan has not even come up with a good scumcase on me either just because I haven't explained my logic. When I have multiple times -- in which I responded and never got a response back -- explained to them.
And this whole thing about not having a solid Scumcase on you, dude, this is mafia, I have a feeling you would call anything short of a Cop guilty "not a solid Scumcase". But even then, it's Day 1, I am working with what I got. And I got someone that's posting a shit ton of bloat, has minimal reads, and throws a tantrum when someone Scumreads them. Is it a solid Scumcase? Not really, but if I were only voting for those who I had a "solid Scumcase" on, we'd be here for a long time.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Me looking at your ISO was only to see if you actually have reads as you had claimed, I said as much. However, in my skimming, I got the feeling that the vast majority of the posts I skipped were posts like "I'm bored/lazy", random setup specc, or otherwise useless posts that don't actually show much of your mindset.In post 609, GrandpaMo wrote:Okay this proves my point. You haven't read my iso -- and have not fully analyzed my mindset. This obviously leads to confbias into pinpointing specific posts (after people have scumread me) to scumread me for and never see a town motive for them. I suggest you doing that + looking at my past games before indulging into my point even more.
Later on, I might muster energy to Actually Read your ISO in full and write a post about it, but I feel like anything I say is just going to be met with more rebuttals about it not being a solid Scumcase and asking me to read your meta or whatever, and I'm not sure I have the willpower.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Why is Ythan in your Townreads?In post 643, Dwlee99 wrote:YthanOnce again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I mean, I went through his ISO yesterday looking specifically looking for his reads and explanations for those, after I was told to do that as he's apparently already posted them. Now, I have been feeling like shit the past few days so I will admit my mistake if I am that blind as to not having seen them, but when the "I've already explained them and I'm not getting a response" keeps repeating... I don't know.In post 655, Ythan wrote:Pointing to your iso and saying "I've already explained this" (if this isn't demonstrably true) and refusing to engage is a scum tell I actually believe in.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Sat down for 10 minutes to reread his ISO. This never happened. The only read that has been explained is the Ythan one. Andres/Kyouko/whoever else had been given weak reasons by quoting a post and calling it Townie. Either we're talking way past each other on what is he referring to as responding or explaining, or this is a lie.In post 608, GrandpaMo wrote:Naathan has not even come up with a good scumcase on me either just because I haven't explained my logic. When I have multiple times -- in which I responded and never got a response back -- explained to them.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Do you know if Scum!Ythan has trouble faking his casual tone? Cause if not, that doesn't sound like a great reason to Townread someone.
Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I don't Townread him, I've been saying that for... a while now. His push on geraintm way back pinged me wrong, and the rest of his posts didn't impress. Though, to be fair, this read is probably due for a reread on my part. That's most likely not happening Today as time is running low, there's not a lot of people that would want to vote him, and I'm feeling a bit lazy and don't feel like doing things that I don't have an immediate use for.In post 661, Dwlee99 wrote:
It sounds like you don't townread ythan? It isn't the best reason necessarily but it's good enough for me to have him higher than the people lower than him and I don't see a reason to have him lower.In post 660, Nathann wrote:Do you know if Scum!Ythan has trouble faking his casual tone? Cause if not, that doesn't sound like a great reason to Townread someone.
Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
In post 663, Kazyan wrote:Kyo, if you're out there, please hammer.
These posts being 7 and a half minutes apart sure is A Look.In post 665, Kazyan wrote:I do not love this gamestate. Nixie, AliceK, and gerantim (to a lesser extent) are off in space, and Enchant is one step above active-lurking. The game is going to be unwinnable if that persists; I actually think I want to yeet a lurker today instead of GMo, if there's enough political will left in the town. Does that sound agreeable?
For the record, I wouldn't mind yeeting a lurker if it shows that they're unlikely to play the game later. Yes, that means Enchant.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
-> A 2v11 game with a confirmed Innocent Child.In post 672, geraintm wrote:a bunch of night actions to help us tomorrow
-> A bunch of useful Night actions.
Pick one.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
If you're judging them on the content they posted, why do you think it's not gonna change going forward? Your recent posts seem to be going through Kazyan's ISO, and judging by 679, you're still only on 92, which feels like a bit of an early call?In post 680, Ythan wrote:I could do Kazyan but I'd rather not do a lurker (Enchant) over him or Gramps d1. I'm judging them on content they posted and that's not likely to change going forward but a lurker will either do something later or be a better target if he's still lurking later imo.
@Dwlee, what changed your mind on me? And on Kazyan, why not.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Well, I don't feel like shooting myself every time I have to post, so you're not wrong.In post 692, Dwlee99 wrote:I also feel like there is something tonally different from dead silence? That part is intangible though and I don't like meta anyway.
Er, sorry, not sure I get what you're trying to say. I wasn't asking about the lurkers.In post 693, Ythan wrote:
I mean I'm looking at their content now and tomorrow they'll have more of the same. It's helpful but I think the difference between a lurker as a potential wagon is larger between days 1 and 2 if that makes sense.In post 691, Nathann wrote:
If you're judging them on the content they posted, why do you think it's not gonna change going forward? Your recent posts seem to be going through Kazyan's ISO, and judging by 679, you're still only on 92, which feels like a bit of an early call?In post 680, Ythan wrote:I could do Kazyan but I'd rather not do a lurker (Enchant) over him or Gramps d1. I'm judging them on content they posted and that's not likely to change going forward but a lurker will either do something later or be a better target if he's still lurking later imo.
@Dwlee, what changed your mind on me? And on Kazyan, why not.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
I don't think anyone should give any Townpoints to someone pointing at their own post and going "why does scum say this?" in the "this is too scummy for scum to say" sense. You obviously think it's Townie, why wouldn't Scum!you say it.
Regarding the rest of the post, I didn't say you had no reads or no analysis, but even what you quoted, most of it is pretty weak questioning. 727 is more what I think of when I say "analysis".
I don't love 727 because a lot of it feels like nitpicking the fact that Dwlee's two scumreads are scumreading each other. Or just in general things that he concludes can be NAI or "fair". It's better than his previous content sure, but meh.
re: Kazyan's grid - I Townread everyone who wasn't on the list of people I said I would vote.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Is the vote result of the meta? If so, sell me on it?In post 770, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Kazyan
Still gotta read the other players, got pulled into some meta here.
Actually sell me on it regardless, I'm not sure where to vote.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
You can easily read me?In post 800, Jolyne wrote:I'm being time efficient and townclearing people i can read easily.
(I know I have other things to respond to, will get to those later.)Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.-
-
Nathann He/TheyGoonHe/They
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 659
- Joined: March 3, 2021
- Pronoun: He/They
Didn't the IC say that nobody in this game has Daytalk or am I imagining that?In post 816, GrandpaMo wrote:Wait -- I think I got it confused. I am in a hood with Titus and DGB... and we think titus is scum.Once again today begins this farce we call a trial.