mini normal 2226; who won

Seanzie · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:01 pm

First!

Seanzie · Post Post #12 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:24 pm

In post 11, Alchemist21 wrote:VOTE: Lukewarm for being the temperature of a tauntaun.

VOTE: Alchemist21 no townie would ever subject the rest of town to this pun.

Seanzie · Post Post #20 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 3:49 pm

My vote on Alchemist was originally a joke, but now it is serious.

Seanzie · Post Post #22 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:15 pm

In post 21, Alchemist21 wrote:What changed?

You posted more.

Seanzie · Post Post #27 (isolation #4) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 4:32 pm

In post 26, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 22, Seanzie wrote:
In post 21, Alchemist21 wrote:What changed?
You posted more.
Why is posting bad?

VOTE: seanzie

It isn't, necessarily.

Seanzie · Post Post #34 (isolation #5) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:02 pm

In post 28, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 22, Seanzie wrote:
In post 21, Alchemist21 wrote:What changed?
You posted more.
What about it was scummy?

Good question. Instead of entering with jokes or RVS, Alchemist seems to want to be friends with everyone.

Seanzie · Post Post #38 (isolation #6) » Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:21 pm

In post 37, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 34, Seanzie wrote:
In post 28, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 22, Seanzie wrote:
In post 21, Alchemist21 wrote:What changed?
You posted more.
What about it was scummy?
Good question. Instead of entering with jokes or RVS, Alchemist seems to want to be friends with everyone.
Except I definitely entered with a joke and an RVS.

Seanzie · Post Post #87 (isolation #7) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:09 am

In post 65, Vulture wrote:
In post 30, Flubbernugget wrote:You attack someone for attacking someone for...posting?

Chainsaw much?
This post is worse than the antagonizing post itself.

There’s not a lot more I have to add to this that hasn’t been said. Umlaut jumped on what we were all thinking.

Datisi felt different this game than the last one I played with him in a way I can’t word exactly, but noticed.

Vulture can have a townlean. They are looking at early interactions in a towny critical way. Not unfakable, but a good look. Also, the "I have a gut read but I can't articulate it" thing I think comes from town a lot more than scum.

Seanzie · Post Post #88 (isolation #8) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:10 am

In post 78, T3 wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.

So uhh.... are you going to?

Seanzie · Post Post #90 (isolation #9) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:21 am

In post 89, T3 wrote:
In post 88, Seanzie wrote:
In post 78, T3 wrote:
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.
So uhh.... are you going to?
He's right.

And the followup question?

Seanzie · Post Post #134 (isolation #10) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:10 am

In post 116, Flubbernugget wrote:
Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.

More votes on Flub plz
so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong
What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?
I'm not seeing it and you're probably overthinking things. dude got pressured on why he voted for you then straight up lied

Eh, I didn't lie so much as just have a brainflub. Tbh I may have had a few drinks last night...

I usually try to get the game going early by overstating a weak scumread on someone to see how people react. I didn't like how buddy-buddy Alchemist was being, and so I wanted to push him on that. Idk why I didn't remember the lukewarm joke.

Seanzie · Post Post #135 (isolation #11) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:13 am

In post 129, Titus wrote:
In post 117, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1, tris wrote:IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTE;
There are exactly three players in this game that have access to private topics.
This has been on my mind a bit, but have mods recently started putting info like this in their rulesets? This was an oddly specific detail to include and if there’s a neighborhood it means there’s a guaranteed scum in there.
That would leave 2 scum for the entire game if one town was in a neighborhood at the start of the game.

I don't think it'd make much sense for a town to be in a neighborhood if only 3 people have BTSC. Unless there is no mafia BTSC (which seems extremely unlikely), the townperson could immediately conclude that their neighbor was mafia, which seems broken.

Seanzie · Post Post #139 (isolation #12) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 9:25 am

In post 136, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm guessing BTSC means behind-the-scenes chat?

Yes, exactly.

Seanzie · Post Post #159 (isolation #13) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 10:49 am

In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an
outraged “you guys don’t see this!?”
act with everyone.

Why is this scummy in your opinion? I often get frustrated when I feel like I see something and others aren't paying attention.

Seanzie · Post Post #162 (isolation #14) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:15 pm

In post 161, Vulture wrote:
In post 159, Seanzie wrote:
In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an
outraged “you guys don’t see this!?”
act with everyone.

Why is this scummy in your opinion? I often get frustrated when I feel like I see something and others aren't paying attention.
My theory is that Flubber felt like they had to double-down and try and 'convince' others and look like a frustrated townie when their logic wasn't going over well.

Oh, okay, so namely the action was faked, rather than the action itself is scummy?

Seanzie · Post Post #165 (isolation #15) » Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:37 pm

In post 163, Aristeia wrote:Does anyone think Flubber is townie?

I could do a trustfall without much trouble, but I wouldn't call them townie. I don't think hammering early is a good idea though.