Mini Normal 2197: Noraaland ~Endgame~
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
Is this just based on general probabilities, or does this conclusion also come from the way it formed?In post 40, ItalianoVD wrote:Definite scum on MURDERCAT.
What do you mean? I don't think anything that Italiano has said so far is rather earth shattering.In post 42, Aristophanes wrote:Oh, good catch Italiano.
Okay, so you think there is scum based on the way the wagon formed. My response to this is that people put a lot less weight to votes very early and will wagon people up in an attempt to see where they go. Anyone who actually lolhammers tends to get scrutinized the following day like what happened to you in Mini Normal 2193 after your day 1 hammer. Thus, it's by no means impossible that an all town formed on MURDERCAT. On the other hand, probability theory suggests that this is unlikely; there's roughly an 80% chance that at least one scum is on the wagon.In post 48, ItalianoVD wrote:The thought of an all town wagon did cross my mind, but would consensus town really be that comfortable bringing any wagon that close to elimination within the first two pages?
I do find it a little strange you are just now getting around to responding to these posts. It'd be more understandable if the thread was bigger, but the thread is currently a very manageable size.In post 54, MURDERCAT wrote:
Hey! Looking forward to playing with you againIn post 21, ItalianoVD wrote:Hey Murder.
(Which player is this referring to?)In post 58, MURDERCAT wrote:The vote I'd be most worried about is pikachu
I do agree with Infinity's observation, but this is somewhat understandable.In post 66, MURDERCAT wrote:I was on my phone and didn't want to be killed
Why is it's closeness to elimination such a concern? This reads to me as scum who are glad they aren't going to be scrutinized because they weren't on the wagon. I'll be sure to keep an eye on you.In post 69, Flea The Magician wrote:also wow I'm glad I was off that wagon
Why should this be MURDERCAT's perspective? Also, who seriously claims from a more or less RVS wagon?In post 80, Titus wrote:his perspective should be, namely that scum deliberately wagoned him to claim
Explain.In post 80, Titus wrote:rule of 3
(In reference to Flea's 69 How exactly? I came to the opposite conclusion.In post 91, ItalianoVD wrote:This is town.
This is really surface level analysis.
In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
This post strikes me as overly aggressive.In post 131, Toogeloo wrote:You don't want a dumb vote, don't make a dumb post.
Oh, so your comment was with regards to the VC. Okay, that makes a bit more sense. I don't agree with the paranoia about lolhammers; sure, they do happen, but like I said, they get scrutinized as well, so it's a very risky move for scum to make. If anything, I would imagine weaker scum teams are most likely to take advantage of them because it is like a free mislim in some ways, especially if they didn't think they would last long.In post 133, Aristophanes wrote:I was glad Italiano caught that error as E-1 seemed premature and a little close for comfort to me since lolhammers are always a possibility and early ones are hard to read.
(In reference to 42 Huh? Why wouldn't you expect scum on the wagon? Or at least, why do you think it's an unreasonable take from Ari?In post 136, Gamma Emerald wrote:Bad post
I’d expect Italiano to think scum would be on there. Not so much you.
Let's not deal in absolutes. Mafia isn't that kind of game. I think it makes perfect sense as scum; it's one of those "hindsight is 20/20" style comments, and those are more likely from scum who knows a player is/was town and thus purposely stayed off the wagon.In post 148, ItalianoVD wrote:Seriously? Doesn't sound like something any scum would say.
I'm pretty sure we had at least 5 days then, unless the desdline was a week. (Admittedly, I don't remember what the day deadline rules for that game were.)In post 154, ItalianoVD wrote:we were close to deadline
I don't like this; it seems a bit overly defensive.In post 167, StatueSurfer wrote:Honestly, knowing we were still in RVS, I just skimmed the first 30 or whatever posts, and then picked someone to vote for a silly reason. I did see his name come up in a couple votes, but I thought he only had like 2 or 3 people voting for him. Anyway, it was just an RVS vote, so UNVOTE:
This is a whole bunch of words that would be elegantly summarized by your first sentence. I also don't buy that a townie would have no clue as to whether there is scum on the wagon. They could at least argue from a probabilistic standpoint even if they didn't scum read any of the individual votes.In post 167, StatueSurfer wrote:Well... I have no idea. I think if scum *are* present they are either a) in the first three, since it's unlikely they planned to try to turbo someone on page 2, although other scum could've hopped on because B) they are (more likely) one of the people who put Murdercat to E-1, in hopes that a clueless townie might hammer him (yes... I realize this includes me.)
Humans don't always make optimal decisions. They can and have many times made mistakes and errors, some big and some small.In post 174, Flea The Magician wrote:But then surely my optimal play there is not you know... not mention it..?
You didn't roll scum again, did you?In post 179, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why does not liking the leading wagons = wanting to no elim? Is there no one you find scummier?
Except... it would be more unusual for there NOT to be one from basic probability theory...In post 181, Gamma Emerald wrote:Italiano is a newer player and I think you’d know it’s practically rngIn the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
Request: Please don't respond to a single post at a time when catching up. Try to group them into chunks so as to not needlessly clutter the thread.In post 206, JacksonVirgo wrote:Isn't a hero solve generally something you give a stab in the dark? But yeah I think you're strongly town from this
Be more precise; why do you perceive it as bad? I don't mean bad in a "town win condition" sense, but bad as in "scum would do this" kind of sense.In post 208, JacksonVirgo wrote:Yeah this is just bad, I like my vote where it is
If you looked, you would find out fairly easily. Anyway, yes, "too scummy to be scum" is a fallacy in a sense, but you seem to be looking at this from a very surface-level perspective. I want you to ask yourself, "What does scum!beginning gain from this?" and to critically evaluate it rather than going "Oh, no elimination is bad. Anyone who suggests something 'bad' is scum. Ergo, beginning is scum."In post 210, JacksonVirgo wrote:That's the whole rabbit hole of TSTBS and that's an actual stupid way to read someone, especially when we have no idea who they are, well at least I have no idea who they are.
I wouldn't call that hard defending. MURDERCAT is simply asking the same thing I'm asking in this post: to think more critically rather than giving a knee-jerk reaction.In post 211, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think just from Murder 'hard-defending' ITB here I think they're not aligned if one flips scum.
(See my sig. Though, I can't remember if I had updated it before you made this post.)In post 218, StatueSurfer wrote:@INB:
"Scummy, weird, nothing else notable... Probably town"; like what? This doesn't seem like a natural or sensible conclusion; you think my behavior has been generally neutral at best and really scummy in some cases. Somehow, your net conclusion is I'm probably town??? Like, I could understand aIn post 218, StatueSurfer wrote:In The Beginning: That vote to, quite deliberately, put MC at E-1 was scummy af. The no-elimination vote is super weird, but doesn't make any sense for scum to do, and I don't he's done anything scummy since. Probably town.nettown read, but "probably todn" is really stretching it from your pov based on your observations.
I will point out that this read has the opposite feel from your read on me, yet your conclusion is somehow null. That's all the more reason for concern.In post 218, StatueSurfer wrote:Murdercat: I think everything he said during the exchange with Infinity was reasonable. Accusing Infinity of lying about his read strength... that's a bit scummy, but considering there is no actual logic to the read to start with, it's understandable. Has also raised a couple decent points. Null.In post 223, Infinity 324 wrote:I wanna TR the effort from a new player, I don't agree that what you pointed out are scumtells for a new player{REDACTED}
Perhaps, perhaps not. It's always easiest to engage on things related to me, so you may see that as being a bit defensive.In post 227, Gamma Emerald wrote:You seem pretty darn defensive rn
You seem particularly focused on MURDERCAT; unusually so in my opinion. I think it would be better if you didn't spend all your time tunneling a single player.In post 255, Infinity 324 wrote:Murder why aren't you trying to sort me
I find this to be false actually. My recent experience with MURDERCAT suggests this is an average or even above average energy level for him.In post 257, Infinity 324 wrote:You've posted a lot about how you don't believe my SR on you, which makes no sense to me because you transparently are less energetic than usual
These are like... two completely different things? Don't you think that you're stretching to make your MURDERCAT fit your read rather than your read fit MURDERCAT. Like, maybe you are right, and I'm not seeing it, but I think it would be good for you to step back and try looking at it from a different angle. It would serve as a precaution snd a sanity check that you aren't actually confirmation biasing yourself on this read.In post 259, Infinity 324 wrote:energy than this, same with haunted village
Or at least, an attention to nuance
(As well as 262 and others:) Toogeloo has been doing some generally good posting; I'm gonna put them in my town pile for now.In post 263, Toogeloo wrote:Not answering for MC here, just stating that it's not a good hunting tool.
And that's the definition of WIFOM. I agree--you don't have to scum read them for it, but I don't really agree you can give it as little weight as you seem to be.In post 291, ItalianoVD wrote:I’m not just disregarding it being openwolfing, but I also wanna give players respect and not think they’d be that reckless.
You definitely shouldn't be scum reading Ari for activity. Ari tends to be busy and less active.In post 295, StatueSurfer wrote:I SRed Ari, Titus, and Johnny partially for activity
Hadn't you read that post by that point in time? Seems a bit weird you're responding to it now.In post 300, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Either what this is referring to has been yeeted by the Host or I am not followingIn post 42, Aristophanes wrote:Oh, good catch Italiano. E-1 this early is a bit much.
Except... it is weak... regardless of meta.In post 302, JacksonVirgo wrote:you cannot say the argument is weak when someone who doesn't know them says that they're scummy for it.In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
And I still fundamentally disagree with your disagreement. Energy is a state of being; energetic players are more responsive and engaged with the game; less energetic players are more leisurely and watchful. Diving into nuance and stuff like that is different; that's a reflection of how deeply someone is reading. You can be engaged but not reading deeply. Likewise, you can be reading deeply and carefully but not engaged and active within the game.In post 331, Infinity 324 wrote:Don't agree that they're different things, the more energy someone has, the more they will be diving into nuance and things like that.
It doesn't feel right. You seemed to just suddenly flip positions without a good progression. In other words, you spent a bunch of time hammering away at MURDERCAT only to do a seemingly last second reversal.In post 331, Infinity 324 wrote:What did you think of me reversing my read?
This is very general, and I think you're discarding the fact that every situation, every post, has a surrounding context. The other issue is not looking at the big picture. What I mean is you need to consider a player's general posting pattern. What are there posts suggesting in general? Focusing too much on individualistic posts doesn't work because there are too many variables at play, and too little info from any single post.In post 332, JacksonVirgo wrote:I do not see it as a town's solving mindset, who would actively be trying to find scum rather than just give in
Never did I say it was a clear. What I did say was that looking at this at a very black and white, "This is bad. Thus, it comes from scum," is a very narrow perspective, and I'm requesting that you look at it from a wider angle. Consider it a game of probabilities; is it more probable scum did this or is it more probable that town did it, not is it good or is it bad.In post 332, JacksonVirgo wrote:it is 100% stupid to clear someone for TSTBS
I'm requesting it because at least one player has abbreviated my username as INB, and I think it's a poor and potentially confusing abbreviation.In post 333, JacksonVirgo wrote:@Beginning, why do you have a request to specifically not use the abbrevation of INB, when that's not even an abbrevation of your name. ITB would be
They move at a walking pace. Also, it's only slow when you compare it to large themes, especially when the large themes have a bunch of fluff posters.In post 345, Toogeloo wrote:I was warned that Normals were slow... I had no idea.
They move andante, at a walking pace. Also, it's only slow when you compare it to large themes, especially when the large themes have a bunch of fluff posters.In post 345, Toogeloo wrote:I was warned that Normals were slow... I had no idea.In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
I said this before the flip as well and got ignored:In post 459, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Same issue with Momrangal, it's easy to say this in retrospectIn post 432, In the beginning wrote:Yesterday's lim was clearly a town flip, and no one even bothered to ask for a claim.
It's not expressed as strongly, that is true, but the sentiment is very much so there.In post 392, In the beginning wrote:Meh, the game seems to have stalled. I don't feel super confident in either wagon, and I think scum are okay with both of them leading. Thus, I would be very hesitant to vote for either wagon.
Yes, the way you're posting here is just busy work. You aren't saying anything of subsistence. Furthermore, the way you are trying to spin Momrangel and my takes on the wagons yesterday when we both clearly expressed reservationsIn post 465, JacksonVirgo wrote:Cool, care to explain?before the flipmakes it clear to me that you are more intent on shading people than finding actual scum.
MURDERCAT is town based on how Infinity has interacted with them.
Johnny is town based on the wagon setup yesterday.
Resorting to the AtE already huh?In post 491, ItalianoVD wrote:Come on?! Really? So I've just been twiddling my thumbs here huh?
I would say Italiano's last few posts are enough evidence to at least vote for him. Titus needs time to work her magic, so I'm giving her that time.In post 501, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Italiano voters convince me that's a better vote than titus
VOTE: Italiano
Infinity seems to be a dead wagon, and days are apparently 7 days now, so we should strive to get more done.In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
I don't really have an opinion on that at this point. I just think the way you handled MURDERCAT earlier didn't seem like you were trying to sort him so much as to get him to confess to being scum. There's still a chance you're town especially if MURDERCAT is actually scum, but I put that interaction as very likely TvS.In post 516, Infinity 324 wrote:What do you think about me pushing JV and italiano too?
??? This is in response to what? Seems a bit overdramatic...In post 537, Salsabil Faria wrote:What!!! I'm on page 12 only andItalianoVDis one of my townreads so far
So... You have only one scum read right now? And what are the stars about?In post 554, Momrangal wrote:This is what in working off of, in all its terrible glory
I guess I do have an opinion: I mostly agree with this take. Jackson seems to be asking questions more for the sake of asking questions rather than solving the game. It's all busy work and not actual solving.In post 560, Infinity 324 wrote:there's a tone that I can't quite describe but it feels like fake curiosity
Why from those two specifically?In post 566, Haschel Cedricson wrote:JohnnyFarrar and Titus.
I think this is actally a good point. Even if it was clearly a joke, scum might want to keep it "up in the air" in case they wanted to use it as a crumb for a fake claim they do later.In post 588, Aristophanes wrote:I actually like this. Flat out backing off of this claim is pro-town considering no deaths tn. Scum would probably continue to fake this claim.
My Infinity read is 100% based on Infinity's interactions with MURDERCAT early day 1. It has nothing to really do with the wagon.In post 588, Aristophanes wrote:@Mara, @Beginning, why does this wagon make Infinity scum? I am now lost again in why you suspect them here.
Fair. I think my thought process at the time was Gamma Emerald had already posted intent, so I figured that Statue would see that as a request for a claim. Johnny proceeded to hammer in about 12 hours from intent, and I don't think Statue was on during that time period. In other words, even if I did ask for a claim, it probably wouldn't have made a difference. I guess I should recalibrate how I am reading Johnny because now that I think about it, shutting off communication there was 1) very survivalistic (since Johnny was the primary other wagon) and 2) pretty antitown (because after all, Johnny hammered a town PR before they had a chance to officially claim.) I still think the wagon and game state at the end of day 1 though suggests that both slots were town and Johnny just made the mechanically wrong move, but it is still something to watch more closely.In post 588, Aristophanes wrote:You were offwagon so this isn't the worst post, but why didn't you ask for a claim?In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
This really feels like you are twisting this in an attempt to find something scummy in it.In post 606, Flea The Magician wrote:SHEEEEEEEP and why does this feel like you're aiming at Mom when Gamma actually claimed intent - the usual point for a claim to happen, and Jonny hammered?
Once more, you don't appear to be reading me in good faith here. The wall posting is a style of posting, not an attempt to attract (or detract attention).In post 606, Flea The Magician wrote:I'M MR TOWNSEEKS LOOK AT MEEEEE.
It's definitely spicy.In post 607, Flea The Magician wrote:Aight my spicy solve rn is in Jonny, Beginning and Catto.
Mine happens to be Jackson, Infinity, and you rn.
VOTE: JacksonIn the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
VOTE: Infinity
I'm sensing a shift in the balance of power.
Ari is town. I'm 77% sure of it.In post 655, JohnnyFarrar wrote:VOTE: Aristo-faynes
I like Haschel, they make me feel bad about myselfIn the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
This doesn't (at least for me) satisfactorily answer the question asked.In post 673, Flea The Magician wrote:Because we both know "ewwww vanity wagon!" will be called.
Seriously?!In post 707, MURDERCAT wrote:I think you could be scum with Ari though..
Admittedly, I didn't look too hard, but please remind me why you think Ari is scum here.In post 712, MURDERCAT wrote:my opinion is that these votes should move to ari or flea
We have time, and quite frankly, a no lim in this situation isn't the end of the world. Not preferable, yes, but none of us are really obvious kill targets, and the extra info will benefit us. I don't think we should be forcing a 1v1, especially not when one of them is a slot I am not considering limming today. At all.In post 718, MURDERCAT wrote:we should consolidate into that 1v1In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
No Titus read.
Dannflor read is based on JacksonVirgo posting. I am ignoring the rep-out for all alignment purposes.
I lean towards Infinity being the scum, but it could go either way at this point tbh.In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
I'm not a gunsmith.In post 912, MURDERCAT wrote:Heat check: Beginning flips mafia gunsmithIn the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
I'm not dodging it. I just don't think it's worth my time to answer it, but if you insist, it boils to some basic reasoning. 1) Ari by his work schedule tends to be lower activity than most people 2) Tons of people were pushing him for what seemed to amount to basically activity-related reasons and 3) When he did post, his posts seemed meaningful enough to me. They certainly didn't ping me. My conclusion was thus that it was a wagon being pushed by scum looking to score an easy miselimination.In post 890, Infinity 324 wrote:
Can you stop dodging the question pleaseIn post 871, Infinity 324 wrote:
I just want you to explain the reasoning that led you to townread ari. That's allIn post 859, In the beginning wrote:I was as sure in that read as in my other reads. Nothing more, nothing less.In the beginning...
I prefer the abbreviation "beginning".
Please don't abbreviate my username to INB.-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
-
-
In the beginning Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: August 23, 2020
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.