avinashv wrote:Vote: Unofficialrulerofeveryone
Because you don't rule me, fool.
For questioning my authoritie!
avinashv wrote:Vote: Unofficialrulerofeveryone
Because you don't rule me, fool.
How is that OMGUS? That's a random vote on the person above him, which I am about to do for hugs and funVel-Rahn Koon wrote:Doh!! OMGUS much?? SCUMSCUMSCUMSCUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!xXFoxXx wrote:Vote: Vel-Rahn Koon
For abbreviating!!
*kills self for his own stupidity*Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:Because I voted for him in post 8UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:How is that OMGUS? That's a random vote on the person above him, which I am about to do for hugs and funVel-Rahn Koon wrote:Doh!! OMGUS much?? SCUMSCUMSCUMSCUM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!xXFoxXx wrote:Vote: Vel-Rahn Koon
For abbreviating!!
Unvote ; Vote: Vel-Rahn Koon AKA "VRK"
zeddicus wrote:unvote, vote:unofficialruleroreveryone
self FoSes are useless, FoSes at all are useless right now.
No, maybe he just hasn't posted yet... geniusLalmtreasteek wrote:The guy I voted hasn't posted yet, what do you think is it because he is a SCUM resignetd to his lynch fate??
funsuckerzeddicus wrote:so don't make idiotic jokes?for being an idiot because of my idiotic jokeCanadia FTWfor supposedly living in "Canadia"
Mod, can we get a prod on Eldritch Lord?
3 Mafia (normal Mafia role), 1 SK (normal SK role), 1 Miller (Pro-town but comes up as scum if investigated) there is no point for a miller unless there is at least 1 Cop, porbably a Doc with so many anti-town, and then probably 5 towniespopulartajo wrote:So, we have 3 mafia, 1 SK but I dont know what role is the other. Anyone could explain?
OMG I DO suck... but thats not the point, no serious discussion has truly happened besides that on the setup, for the point of keeping this game from going down the toilet because I am in itzeddicus wrote:the miller could be a lyncher. has to kill a certain townie to clear his name.
Unofficial is probably right with the setup though, unless there are any other variations we could think of. (besides miller = lyncher)
also unofficial, you voted me for voting you? OMGUS much?
What the hell, might as well,Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:I think we should start a random bandwagon and see where it goes, a la Glork.
Unvote, vote: zeddicus
Let me explain myself... 1st is OMGUS in random voting, 2nd is when I see a reason to actually voting and (not bothering to go back and check who my random vote was on) unvote and revote, I shortly unvote and then revote jumping on the bandwagon VRK started, which I agree may make me look scummy, but really I only voted him twice, and the OMGUS vote changed into a vote with a small bit of reason. I guess I saw my jump back on zedd as just revoting since he didn't prove himself innocent.Pink Puppy wrote: URoE: votes zeddicus 3 times. One is an OMGUS. One is a bandwagon jump.
Duh, even newbie games have a doc/cop or both, and in this game, especially when looking at the setup zedd pointed out, it is hard to imagine why there wouldn't be. I'm not sure why Snix said that, but it hardly seems like a scum slip-up, maybe a just a stupid comment judging by the flavour? My vote will have to stay with zedd for now though.Pink Puppy wrote:Why do you think this setup has only an SK and a miller? No powerroles for town would put us at a horrible disadvantage. I don't know a lot about balance, but I'm pretty sure a game with mafia, SK, miller and no power roles would be very unbalanced.
It wasn't really a second vote, I'm just lazy and didn't go back to notice that he was my random vote. There is no reason to jump on me for a joke, this is happening to someone who is obviously protown in another one of my games and it is ridiculous. I see jumping on someone trying to make a joke into a real reason looks scummy to me, which is why this vote had a "reason", which is why I voted for him. I never said it explained anything, I just didn't want to leave anything out and get jumped on for that. I said look at the time stamps BEFORE the random wagon, he was given almost 13 HOURS, and the attack on me for that is also, ridiculous. I have to say that VRK's random bandwagonning is scummier, but has been forgotten because of what I did. Please re-read and try to understand somethings I said. Any response?caf19 wrote:So, let's look at UnofficialRulerOfEveryone's reasons for voting and unvoting zeddicus. Firstly, post 73:
Hang on there. Let's go look at that 2nd vote - it's in post 30. In that post, UROE calls zed a "funsucker" and votes for him because zed told him to stop making jokes. That's not a "reason to actually vote", it's the least serious reason ever. So basically, that explanation is full o' crap.Let me explain myself... 1st is OMGUS in random voting, 2nd is when I see a reason to actually voting and (not bothering to go back and check who my random vote was on) unvote and revote,
Er, yes. That's a recount of what happened and doesn't actually explain anything.I shortly unvote and then revote jumping on the bandwagon VRK started
UROE elaborates a bit more in post 81 where he says he voted zed a 3rd time because he failed to "defend himself". Defend himself against what? The only attacks on him, UROE, were your random votes, and VRK deciding to start a totally random wagon on him. And after that random wagon started you gave him all of... 13 minutes before voting for him. So, you weren't really looking for zed to defend himself, you just jumped right on after it looked like you were getting some support for your reasonless attacks.
In other words, UnofficialRulerOfEveryone = lies upon lies. Scum, in my eyes.
Thanks for that, I am amazed that I get attacked, it technically wasn't even a triple vote just a double (yeah, I know that's part of why I'm under attack), but they have been ignored, caf and marmalade, any reason they were left out of this? because they lurked?Pink Puppy wrote:(SNIP)
I also think that it's very suspicious that VRK and Snix has disappeared after coming under fire.
(SNIP)
I never said that, did I? I meant that they have barely even been addressed after that, mostly because they won't answer questions and are lurking.Pink Puppy wrote: (SNIP)
Do not think that other people's scumminess makes you look better.
Caf's point was more of "If your vote isn't serious, simply unvote" There is no need to unvote and then revote immediately. I also don't want Lynch-a-Lurker as this goes off very little other than "These two are lurking, this one has one vote, this one has none, vote for the one that has one vote already" logic. I believe I have 2 votes Zed has 3 votes Caf has 1 vote and Marmalade has 1 vote, but not 100% sure.avinashv wrote:Yes, I do realize who I am voting for. Going by the votecount, I don't see a BW on UOE. I actually meant I'll hammer at deadline, assuming he is still at 3 votes, if there's no response. I'll admit, that was my bad. There are 5 other people in 2 BW's, but I am the one who is eager to lynch? I guess the start of this post may clarify that, I held off a vote purely because I'd like to hear from him an give him a chance.
Not quite, yet it still made my head hurt.Pink Puppy wrote:OMG longest post ever.
Mod request seconded.caf19 wrote:(SNIP)
Er, do you realise you were actually unvoting Zeddicus there and not VRK?UROE wrote:I can't say that much against VRK anymore, so Unvote.
MOD: Please clarify how many votes we need to lynch at deadline. Thanks.