Could we start the discussion with, "Why do you think it's a scum slot?" Right now I see "Good vote, but slot is empty." Solid logic.In post 317, Transcend wrote:Hi Penguin, you subbed into a scum slot. Discuss.
UNVOTE:
Could we start the discussion with, "Why do you think it's a scum slot?" Right now I see "Good vote, but slot is empty." Solid logic.In post 317, Transcend wrote:Hi Penguin, you subbed into a scum slot. Discuss.
It did the last time I played this setup.In post 325, Dont_Vote_Me wrote:I'd say the real danger is if the N1 cop who claims is actually scum.Does that even work out.
This seems a bit opportunistic. What is it about DVM that makes you okay with voting him?In post 414, texcat wrote:I could also vote for DVM.
It's opportunisticIn post 419, Transcend wrote:How is tex's intent to vote DVM "opportunistic" as opposed to the 4 people on his forming bandwagon?
Says creepy dancing child guy who hasn't provided a reason beyond his disdain for phallic representations of the patriarchy.In post 423, TTTT wrote:I don'wanna lynch DVM
Why is everybody forgetting how scummy Peng's slot is?
Could you explain a bit more, because all I found was this:In post 425, texcat wrote:I previously expressed suspicion of Sub. Mainly for his unexplained town read of KT. DVM has not really improved my read on the slot.
Which is kinda the same thing you said in my previous quote.In post 286, texcat wrote:But could imagine myself voting for Sub, as well.
Can you sum up why that slot is scum in the form of a haiku first?In post 430, notscience wrote:vote the scum w/ me!
Brava. Brava.In post 432, notscience wrote:He likes to guard blawb
The highest guy on his list
And he kicks puppies
So, I loved the haiku and all, but I'm not seeing DVM scum. While not too fond of his 390, 406, and 455; he hasn't really defended Blawb without reason. And, while part of me thinks he just wants to out an N1 cop he's being fairly logical in his reasoning for it, and the only danger would be if Blawb and DVM are both scum. Even then, it would be a bad trade because we would power lynch Blawb D2 in that circumstance.In post 454, notscience wrote:Dvms protection over him despite blawb being his highest scumread is sketchy as shit too
This triggers me.
What do you think of DVM's RO?In post 530, Blawb wrote:I won't speculate on the RO (even though I still think it's scummy personally).
Sorries. Replacing in to an inactive game hasn't helped kindle that spirit much. I am going to finally put my vote down since someone has done something worthy of it.In post 637, Firebringer wrote:I've played with you before and your fighting spirit is nowhere to be seen buddy
This is all kinds of bad.
There is scum in here. It's somewhere in arona, texcat, or Creature.In post 636, Not Chara wrote:Firebringer [5]: notscience, aronagrundy, Creature, Flubbernugget, texcat
This one bothers me. Blawb is scummy and TTTT's most recent vote was super scummy, but I don't think both are scum...wouldn't make sense. Leaning towards this meaning Blawb is town and TTTT is scum. Blawb hasn't wavered from his vote on me, but TTTT was pushing notscience until this recent opportunity.In post 636, Not Chara wrote:PenguinPower [4]: Blawb, Transcend, Firebringer, TTTT
Can't read Pep at all. Completely inactive. Don't know on chilledtea - he was super for a DVM lynch and then all of a sudden you changed his mind when I don't think you've done that much tbh. Kyouko is probably town.In post 636, Not Chara wrote:Transcend [1]: Pepchoninga
aronagrundy [1]: ssbm_Kyouko
Not Voting [2]: PenguinPower, chilledtea
It's not a VCA, but I cbf'd to type out a whole reads list and it was the easiest way to convey my current thoughts.In post 643, Flubbernugget wrote:D1 vca is the bees knees guys
K. You can be scum with TTTT. What case has TTTT offered on me, and why not continue to push a scumread instead of pushing someone else and then hopping back on an opportunistic wagon?In post 647, aronagrundy wrote:VOTE: penguin
I support this. I haven't liked any of his input since replacing in and I feel like he's been actively avoiding scumhunting (that weird haiku thing was ridiculous). His case on TTTT is really contrived too. TTTT's been consistently scumreading pp since his replace in and his push on notscience seemed genuine to me.
I can't believe no one is reacting to this. Like, I can't literally be f'd to do anything if this doesn't even get a mention.In post 688, TTTT wrote:None.In post 684, PenguinPower wrote:What case has TTTT offered on me
but my lack of explanation doesn't make you town
low content gameIn post 684, PenguinPower wrote: and why not continue to push a scumread instead of pushing someone else and then hopping back on an opportunistic wagon?
nobody else wanted you lynched so I looked elsewhere
Compared to your tireless scum hunting? Ho hum, TTTT hasn't done shit, but he's town and you're scum because REASONS!In post 708, aronagrundy wrote:It's more that penguin's active avoidance of providing any real content have been getting to me, and that I don't think you two are scum together.
Think I've already answered, but for clarity:In post 710, Firebringer wrote:Let's start here penguin.
Who is scum pushing you.
Who is town pushing you.
The f'ing haiku thing was an obv joke...seriously...wtf. Who is going to legit sheep someone because they can put together a haiku. That feels extremely forced.In post 712, aronagrundy wrote:Also I think I've said this but I really liked TTTT's push on notscience, and I can see why he would move back on to pp after said push didn't go anywhere
I don't know how to debate gut and meta. So...yeah...cool...In post 720, Firebringer wrote:Arona feels town due style which feels reminiscent of their town game I played with them awhile ago. I see nothing noticeable deviation and I like their push on you.In post 718, PenguinPower wrote:Why do you think the TTTT/arona slot are town? I'm cool with a Blawb lynch despite his seemingly lynchproofness, but I can't see town feels from TTTT and arona.
I liked TTT post about being manipulated. Gave me gut town feel in the situation
Cool. Useful tips moving forward. Considered it argued.In post 722, Firebringer wrote:Well you could argue the context was scummy in both those scenarios.
The haiku was an F'in joke. Dip. It was nothing but, and thusly, had no impact on my read. I haven't voted anything for a week because this game is inactive as sin, and I an a reactionary reads player. My HS plays 48/24 games. There is none of this inactive crap.In post 723, aronagrundy wrote:The haiku was an excuse to act like you were seriously considering dvm to be scum when you were never actually considering it. You literally went a week without voting.In post 716, PenguinPower wrote:The f'ing haiku thing was an obv joke...seriously...wtf. Who is going to legit sheep someone because they can put together a haiku. That feels extremely forced.In post 712, aronagrundy wrote:Also I think I've said this but I really liked TTTT's push on notscience, and I can see why he would move back on to pp after said push didn't go anywhere
Also....why can you see the move back on me. Easy to say...try to explain.
Bascially I'm seeing TTTT as a player that's trying to get things done but no one's biting at one he's giving out (his original vote on you, then the not science push). So when finally the vote moves back to you he jumps at it. You're trying to compare his low post count to yours but I can see him actually trying to engage in discussion and sort players.
Fantastic. So you just want the flip. Jesus.In post 751, Creature wrote:Verb of manifestation.
Can you explain this for me...because manifest in the context in which you used it literally means "reveal." Why not just ask me to express my thoughts?In post 765, Creature wrote:Btw, by "manifest" I mean't "show up with your thoughts".
Color me surprised...did you even read what you wrote above? Because this statement doesn't align with your (bad) thought process.In post 1098, Blawb wrote:I currently think that PP....would be our best lynches today.
Why Creature?
So....not much to catch up on...but I'm confused with this post. Like...really confused.In post 1288, notscience wrote:I was following transcend.In post 1216, texcat wrote:Not Science, You've said you think Blawb is scum, haven't you? Why aren't you voting there?
I also am townreading arona
also
VOTE: arona
but i would like to vote blawb
I'm guessing because of this:In post 1295, chilledtea wrote:Why are you voting someone you townread?
In post 948, Firebringer wrote:Just for shits and giggles what if I am town?In post 947, notscience wrote:If Fire flips scum, Blawb is leashed to me tonight. If I die overnight, he dies tomorrow.
In post 949, notscience wrote:Transcend.
Explain. Cause you've done nothing this entire game except lurk and vote me and call it obvious.In post 1353, Blawb wrote:VCA @ D2 lynch confirms what I've thought this entire game.
I've been burned by this in the past. Still thinking about how to take it.In post 1352, texcat wrote:I am Night 2 cop. I investigated Titus and found town.
Why?In post 1392, chilledtea wrote:I do think there is a high chance all three of the people who claimed to have copped titus are town.
I'm cool with this, but I'd like to swap out Flubber for Blawb.In post 1427, Transcend wrote:One in {Flubber, kyouko} one in {chilled, penguin}
But, why would you auto-assume that Texaco's claim was legit? If you were town, and notsci left crumbs, wouldn't that cast some suspicion for you on a third cop investigating the same target?In post 1451, chilledtea wrote:Texcat was the first cop to report on copping titus, and I townread her prior to that.
Notscience left hints that he would cop titus, pretty much I townread him anyways before that.
Myself, cause I am town.
I don't think you understand the setup correctly.In post 1536, CloudKicker wrote:"Every town player will be either a Doctor or a Cop, with their ability only working on their assigned Night [from 1-5]."
If i understand correctly, theres 2 town prs that can act every night. Depending on the distrisbution it can be 2 cops 2 docs or 1 each, 4 of the nights at least cop/doc.
So if everyone claims their nights, theirbed 2 ccs
I prefer previous Blawb. He was just bad. You're just annoying.In post 1551, Blawb wrote:PP / CK scum squad imo. Notty, just hammer PP please. No need for the theatrics.In post 1549, CloudKicker wrote:@Transcend, is this actually the first game ever we are both town on this site ?
I'm trying to have a metamorphosis from aquatic flightless bird to aquatic flightless bird with fingers. Damnit, Transcend.
Sorry...modding a few games. They take priority.In post 1647, Transcend wrote:He's on the site but thread dodging
What is a rxn? New term for me.In post 1624, CloudKicker wrote:Also that rxn is pretty bad