VOTE: havingfitz
I think having
Hahahaha
Laugh.
OMGUS
In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.
I'll be honest with you though, it seems like such a claim might cause a potential knee jerk reaction from an actual mason that'd cause them to give themselves away. Makes me suspicious of the post because it comes across as role fishing early in the game.In post 52, Alisae wrote:My theory is that scum would be more aware of the playerlist then town would be.In [url=/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8706177#p8706177]post 39[/url], havingfitz wrote:Your post was on the same page as the player list? I had to look at it to confirm my doubt Transcend was in the game. Why wouldn't scum just glance at the list as well.In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.
And what if you had putted a mason accidentally?
P.edit
So an outted stupid mason would be ok?
And I wouldn't out a mason since I would try to mention someone who wasn't in the game.
No an outed mason would not be okay.
Where are you extrapolating this fromIn post 108, boring wrote:...so you've not bothered to read the four whole pages before this one? Are you overwhelmed by the breakneck pace of this dynamic and ever-changing game? (I suppose that would explain the catchup post you made earlier)In post 106, mozamis wrote:i thought someone voted for him cos he said someting to the mod. i dont see how that was scummy.In post 104, boring wrote:What don't you get in particular? I'd like to believe that I explained my thoughts okay. Did you just disagree?
Even if you thought that was the reason for one vote, one vote does not a wagon make.
Sound out, I've got you nowIn post 117, boring wrote:@ConManMickSpoiler:
He said he didn't get the wagon. Since I had explained my vote thoroughly, I asked whether he needed clarification, or if he simply disagreed. His response was to cherry-pick something pretty unrelated to the actual wagon, as if he didn't bother to actually read. I found it incredulous.
I also wove in a passive-agressive remark about how ridiculous it is to make a catchup post (which he made on page 3 or 4) so early in a slow game.
No worries of that manIn post 146, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Hey CMM, long time no see!
I'm going to apologize in advance if you're scum and I need to lynch you!
I just thanked him for posting an explanation of the posts like I'd asked
In terms of BBT, I liked his play this far. It reminded me of a game we played ages ago, I think it was an ice and fire multiball, or else a game I was in at the same time, I'll have to have a look. His style is aggressive tunnelling, IMO. I have a good feeling about him and would not lynch that slot today. I also played with him as my partner in my first ever scum game so I'll check out our old PT and that game, see if anything looks familiar.In post 669, Hawk wrote:In post 666, ConManMick wrote:Having played with BBT before I can see this reaction coming from him as town
Holy shit where did you come from!!
But seriously please weigh in here. Also Meta is NAI.... sulking after this scenario is easily done by town and scum....
How do you feel about BBT before this?
What's your reads look like?
I have like 1000 questions but just start posting content please CMM
Touching on my earlier comments re: Moz - this seemed kind of opportunistic. I had been reading fitz as town, so I guess that sort of tripped me up. His early posts are very much filler, and there's something very buddy-buddy about the style that rankles me. I could lynch this. I'm going to read read fitz too, see if I still stand in the same place on it.In post 231, mozamis wrote:yeah, havent seen anything massively town yet fromFitz.In post 188, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:where is fitz 'genuinely' scum hunting?
I like -Grey- and LUV's play, I reckon for today they are town and I'm not willing to lynch them by any means stretch. As for Ali, all I can say about his play is it's just very... Zero fucks given, or something. Can't sort him. I'd sooner lynch than not for a bit of peace of mind.In post 684, Hawk wrote:
@CMM What do you think of the people involved right around the time of the fake hammer. (Grey, Ali, LUV). Note that Ali really wasn't apart of it he just happened to unvote to prevent derphammer and then revoted when he got the claim I don't really read that one way or the other since I can understand that reasoning.
I have a custom title, come at meIn post 745, Alisae wrote:I got my JOAT title already and I've been here for a way shorter period then you have.In post 743, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I just want free slurpees man.
Git Gud.
That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heardIn post 883, mozamis wrote:i voted for you early on, so it feels like that.
[Grendel wrote:Con Man Mick
Spoiler:
Empking
Spoiler:
I mean, let's take a look at my ISO...:mozamis wrote:and thanks for the OMGUS!
In post 469, ConManMick wrote:Townwise I'm liking
BBT- play reminds me of old games we had together. Entrance looks good.
Anti - very strong entrance
-Grey- - my vote here was RVS of the best kind, pressure on the slot. I'm glad this wasn't lynched while I was gone because grey took the pressure like a champ and I'm fairly confident in this being town now.
On the question of scum
Moz, Fancy Pants, Alisae would be my reads, Alisae being more of a lean, the others I can see a bit more easily.
In post 472, ConManMick wrote:Moz's play seems very insincere to me, I'll try pin point why so that this is a little less airy fairy.
In the Anti vs. Fancy majig that went down a while back, it seems like Anti made solid points, whilst fancy's counter arguments were reaching. I didn't like it.
In post 676, ConManMick wrote:Touching on my earlier comments re: Moz - this seemed kind of opportunistic. I had been reading fitz as town, so I guess that sort of tripped me up. His early posts are very much filler, and there's something very buddy-buddy about the style that rankles me. I could lynch this. I'm going to read read fitz too, see if I still stand in the same place on it.In post 231, mozamis wrote:yeah, havent seen anything massively town yet fromFitz.In post 188, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:where is fitz 'genuinely' scum hunting?
Like if you'd called me out on tunnelling then yeah, guilty as charged, but OMGUS? and by your justification I could call your vote on me OMGUS you're full of beans sir.In post 754, ConManMick wrote:Fancy slot and Moz potentially scum. Fitz and hawk I see town. The others nothing jumps out right now