[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 4717795 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Diffusion of Power (Open 478) over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #1629 (isolation #3) » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:07 am
Postby Nachomamma8 »
In post 82, Human Destroyer wrote:See, the main reason why his whole playstyle so far has been inherent bullshit is that anyone that is going into a game should check the playerlist to see if there's anyone in there that they absolutely refuse to play with based on playstyle.
Signing up to a game where the first thing you do is going to be "POLICY POLICY POLICY" is inherently anti-town.
Before you say something about playstyle, I don't make generalizations about anyone's playstyle until I feel I have enough experience with them to confidently make such generalizations. So to say someone usually plays in an anti-town manner, I very well expect you to prove it's part of their playstyle and not scummy.
Using that logic, I don't think tigerzone would come into a game like that; he would look to be pro-town. Therefore, I think his zab PL is complete fabrication and he's scum.
P-Edit: No.
P-P-Edit: Ironic that I happened to address that before it happened.
hd can probably be town for this. generally when scum hop onto the "lol anti-town" vote, they do it with less passion since that shit is a purchase made for free.
Each day we all have an ability. Those who don't are, well, the scum.
A mass claim wouldn't be stupid, in fact it would draw out scum immediately due to roles. But if we want this game to drag out and more interesting, we could just wait till lylo
the idea is bad, the implementation is town
In post 123, Mitillos wrote:Because that seems like a horribly convenient thing for them to say, to not participate in scumhunting and bus each other at the same time. Have you two done the same thing before in a previous game? That is, each of you attacking the other for "knowing in advance they'll be anti-town"?
>.>
you could just check the game that has already been referenced...
slimer has this weird habit where he pretends to be scum when he's town and pretends to be town when he's scum
but both times the performances are completely overblown and it comes around full circle
he's town
In post 195, Mitillos wrote:Anyone who wants to PL tiger for wanting to PL zab is being a hypocrite.
this ignores a lot of things that have been happening
In post 198, ProHawk wrote:Absolutely not. I will stand up for petroliumjelly based on principle alone.
I will vote for tiger the entire game if he isn't lynched today. If N has replacements lined up, I will replace out of the game so I don't ruin town's chances at winning. I have yet to ask for replacement so as to not be a burden on the administrative tasks of this game.
P-EDIT: I never was fine with shrimp accusing you of cheating, and Adam's bullying was not over the top, at least I didn't see it that way. Wisdom has been defending everyone, so I don't find it uncharacteristic that he takes the devils advocate role often.
zab abandoning the policy lynch when people stop yelling at him for not abandoning the policy lynch is smooth as butter
In post 301, Human Destroyer wrote:If this town is actually retarded enough to lynch me, you make it up by lynching Wisdom and mollie, in that order.
aaah
so wrong
so town
In post 462, Mitillos wrote:@Disturbed: I'm not sure that defensiveness and OMGUS aren't null-tells, to be honest. And I'm not sure that HD's scumhunting is sincere.
Also, What CF said. Take it easy guys.
this is also shitty because all you are doing is coasting.
In post 471, zabriel wrote:Why is everybody replacing? You bastards are easier to read when you play the whole game.
seems pretty genuine
In post 565, Mitillos wrote:I'm starting to see the allure of policy lynches...
@Beauty: Alright, fair enough, on the fuzzy/queen side of things. But don't you think that Siv's been too quiet to be scum, rather than null?
no...
ONE THIRD
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1665 (isolation #9) » Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:56 am
Postby Nachomamma8 »
i just finished final paper
girlfriend is heading off to Israel tomorrow, so I'm not going to be online that much tonight
but after that
baby, I'm yours.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1697 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:11 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
done reading, consider me officially engaged while they look for a replacement
mit is a great lynch and i was going to call him and HD partners but they are bussing in a stagnant fucking game so that doesn't make much sense
mit and zab is the feeling right now, but i want mit
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1700 (isolation #11) » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:48 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
In post 1698, Mitillos wrote:@Nacho: So, HD is bussing me in a stagnant game and that makes no sense, but I'm bussing zab in the same stagnant game and it does make sense?
timing.
HD went from strong town read to bussing you as soon as momentum turns against you? Probably not.
You turn against zab who you've been interacting with minimally for the entire game along with some soft-distancing? Hell. Yes.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1724 (isolation #14) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:24 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
In post 1723, Mitillos wrote:I kind of expected Bacde to die, what with being conf-town, after yesterday's flip. I'm thinking scum killed CF to throw suspicion on me. This makes me think HD isn't the remaining scum.
this is stupid.
Vote: Mitillos
I don't like how you played the "I feel uncomfortable with him getting hammered without a claim" card, yet didn't unvote at all to prevent that from happening. Why not?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1737 (isolation #15) » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:54 am
Postby Nachomamma8 »
In post 1728, Mitillos wrote:@Nacho: Because that shouldn't have been necessary in the first place. The hammerer could have waited just as well, if it had been an issue.
Anyway, if we're lynching me today, I'd like to ask for a mass-claim, first. I think there shouldn't be any problems with it, at this point.
why do you want a massclaim
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1756 (isolation #16) » Fri Mar 29, 2013 12:21 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
i guess massclaiming is fine, although i'll admit i haven't thought about it much at all
it just seems like with the claims being unknown, bacde is an optimal target for anyone
but if we don't happen to have a night 5 cop, then scum could manipulate how lylo is gonna end up
and if we do have a night 5 cop, sure bacde's gonna protect him
but it's not like he'd get shot if we didn't massclaim
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1812 (isolation #17) » Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:03 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
In post 1773, ProHawk wrote:Both had already claimed by then. If either are competent scum would know that a mass-claim would spell their death. Which post looks like scum?
in a situation with three night 5 doctors and a night 5 cop, yes.
if we kept our mouth shut, didn't massclaim, scum probably would've shot bacde, nothing would've happened.
cheery would have a free result!
unless scum somehow correctly read cheery as cop, which is laughable
In post 1791, Mitillos wrote:It is possible that both Nacho and I are town and scum is one of Pro/HD.. I personally think Nacho is the last scum, though.
Since everyone claimed N5 Doc, though, we have an alternative. We no-lynch. We have Bacde protect Cheery. We have both Pro and HD protect Bacde. At least one is telling the truth, so both confirmed town (Cheery and bacde) are certain to survive the night. Meanwhile, Cheery investigates one of the 4 potential scum (me, Nacho, Pro, HD). Scum will most likely kill one of these three, as well. With any luck, Cheery will investigate someone else. Even if Cheery gets an innocent result, we have 3 confirmed townies and 2 non-confirmed, tomorrow. Lynch one, then the other, town wins. The only snag will be if Cheery happens to investigate the kill target. So, I recommend rolling a die to decide that. That way, there will be no way for scum to predict his investigation target and kill accordingly.
Vote: No Lynch
and this is honestly just a giant can of what the fuck
In post 1799, ProHawk wrote:Also, I don't think that BACDE should protect Cheery as he is already confirmed. Either HD or myself should protect Cheery because if Cheery dies, then the person who said they would protect him is confirmed-scum.
?
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.
Post
Post #1815 (isolation #18) » Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:26 pm
Postby Nachomamma8 »
autowin: lynch 1 of me/mitillos, one of the survivor/two claimed night 5 docs
scum kills one of the survivor/two claimed night 5 docs
scum is between whoever lives and cheery
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.