@Silvor: What do you think of Nstride and his attack on you?
Nstride: Anything you want to add to the game beside your plan and Silvor vote there?
First of all there were a few people that called out Team for his middle of the road comment. However Glow as about as wishy washy as Team
glowball wrote:NStride's proposal makes sense, but can have really bad side effects if/when we are wrong about players....I mean considering it's very likely to mislynch day one, then accidentally kill night one, plus the mafia kill. I mean it definitely narrows down the numbers and therefore the possibilities but it also gets them steps closer to their win condition. It's basically the same way we always play just a quicker version with us picking off ourselves, I mean we still have to be good at finding scum and this plan just gives us less room for error.
VOTE: tclawren
IE: it makes sense. Has bad effect. Could cause a problem. He is pointing the negative while saying it makes sense.
How does it make sense if everything you post about it is negative?
Tclawren is the first to mention Team's post
tclawren wrote:
The fencesitting in Teamsleep's post 16 is making my ass hurt just reading it.
I call this testing waters. Pointing out something without really saying much (IE: doesn't call it scummy and doesn't vote for Team)
Then we have Sundy's reason and vote:
Sundy wrote:Hello everyone, especially Q, Teamsleep, and Farside.
W/r/t game mechanics: I agree that we should openly discuss the best possible course of action for the doctors, and weigh out the pros & cons once we determine how many serious scum-suspects we have.
vote: Teamsleep
I liked Nstride's little experiment deal, but I feel that he went into it with pre-conceptions about what kind of a response was scummy or town-ish, and I think he's a projecting a little to achieve the case on Silavor, and Teamsleep's response was worse. Sentences like this don't seem to have the bloodthirst of hunting scum to them:
Teamsleep wrote:I guess what I'm saying is, I do want to try it once, but if it backfires, I don't want to do it the upcoming days.
This is highly, highly inaccurate. I just got thru explaining caution if there is a mislynch and the doctors all target a town player with 3 town dead and he's saying Team should be more bloodthirsty. Ummmm no.
I really don't like players that keep a vote on RVS while pointing out scummy things about others
tcl
Then I question Newmann who state something that was brought up already. Newman and team's argument look petty. Newman is attacking things I find questionable but his response to my question actual made sense.
I just don't like that people pointed to Team and then ignore Glow's response completely. The BW on Team looks scummy.
That said Newmann went from scummy to null. I found a few high's and lows.
Tclawren went sky high on the scum meter for testing waters and riding low under the radar while saying next to nothing in the game.
unvote:
vote: Tclawren
fos: Sundy
Pinkyfloyd needs to post more content.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.