Scott Brosius wrote:Vote: Toffee
Toffee is delicious....too delicious.
Absolutely Yummmmmm-eeee ;D
Lol. VOTE: don_johnson Well..well.well.. the don in plain sight!
RedCoyote wrote:chesskid 24 wrote:How am I helping the scum PR hunt?
Unvote;vote: chesskid3
Don't be dense, please.
chesskid 26 wrote:Everyone who says on page 1 I'M not blahhhhhhhhhh is neccesarily not a PR and also not even the PR they claimed to not be?
It's one less possibility they must consider. Suppose the Hider, Hider Tracker, and Detective/Psychologist all die by D2. It's unlikely, but it's possible.
Then the scum know they don't need to worry about you, friend.
chesskid 27 wrote:Softclaim/hardclaim/whateverclaim VT on page 1? Explain scum motivations or gtfo with your chesskid-is-scum read.
Well, it was anti-town and makes you more likely to be a VT. If we go through D1 by just getting a VT claim and lynching them, well, that's far from the worst scenario possible for the town. In other words, your stock has went down as a helpful player for this town thanks to your actions, so you're going to have to work harder than the rest of the people here to overpass them (at least in my eyes).
don_johnson wrote:no, they're actually mismatched, and you are scum.you have erased any doubt from my mind.
DemonHybrid wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:HellloooNewman wrote:RedCoyote wrote:Then vote him.
Anxious much? We have abitof time before the DL. I think I'll vote when I'm good and ready. K, thanx.
Well do you have any suspects atm?
Deity is so obviously scum. Those questions are so transparent and useless.
DemonHybrid wrote:toffee wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:If Deity is scum, so is toffee.
How, please?
I happened read a game with Deity as player, I think this is just his style.
"It's his style."
Um....
no. That's a red herring and that's also as transparent as polished glass. Never blame something legitimately scummy like that on "I think it's his playstyle".
DemonHybrid wrote:That is what usually happens in some games, but how I want it is, lynching people once we've gotten "strong" evidence.
And that's why you're scummy. You can't get strong evidence unless you immerse yourself into the weak evidence to build cases.
don_johnson wrote:i like the rc vote. but nameloc should go first.
toffee: not a whole lot of substance or "case" behind my suspicion of nameloc, but i'll try to flesh it out later. he just reads like maneuvering scum. rc is really making soft votes as if he's keeping a way to avoid accountablity.
RedCoyote wrote:toffee 84 wrote:I don't understand this, I read you're thinking chess as town but at the same time you're voting him. Scum alarm activated.
What I'm saying is that he's straight less likely to be a PR. Because of that, as I said to SSSS, if we end up lynching a VT at the end of today with no other claims, that's not the worst scenario we can come across. I don't necessarily mean I think he's scum or not. Obviously I don't know either way.
toffee 84 wrote:Then in post #53 you're saying if it's better to hunt an anti town VT because it's D1 and all, I just can't understand the logiiiiiiiiiiiiiccccccccc
I'm not acting like a "hero", so let's get on the same foot here. I don't know where you got that idea. I'm just saying, to SSSS, that, especially in this game, night actions are so vital for the town.
Today it would be better to lynch a VT and not out any of our PRs than lynch a scum an out several of our PRs. Do you agree with that?
nameloc1986 wrote:@toffee: Your defending of DK is noted. I love also how you say: "If every time Deity's oddness were forgiven by me just because I think he's a newbie, this could back stab me hard if in the end he turned scum, newbie scum." If DK ever flips scum, it won't look good for you.
I don't understand the RC wagon.
nameloc1986 wrote:Toffee, your whole case against him is how you don't agree with him. You're makingabout him that IMO have no weight. I don't necessarily agree with him either, but I don't see how he's scummy for it.assumptions
RedCoyote wrote:toffee 144 wrote:it is town job to find scum, not killing each other apart.
If your opinion is that I'm trying to lynch town, then you're incorrect. That's not my intention. My intention is to lynch scum. I just want everyone to understand that lynching a VT on D1 without any other claims, given this setup, is a satisfactory outcome.
toffee 144 wrote:Why should we be convinced w/ chesskid lynch in this case?
There's no chess "case". If I was wanting chess lynched right now, I'd be rallying y'all to the wagon. It's just a spot to keep my vote because I think, if the day ended right now, he'd be the one I'd most want lynched. I would not prefer him lynched right now (nor would I anyone).
DeityKabuto wrote:@RedCoyote
I will explain my vote, but if I did it now, than nameloc would have it way much easier.
@HeloooNewman
Also, notice how nameloc isn't posting as much, a bit scummy to me.
Unvote
Vote HellloooNewman
You sir, are fucking contradicting yourself. Earlier in the game, I had ask you TWO fucking questions, and you avoid them, and now you vote me for avoiding your fucking questions, DID I place a vote on you? No. I don't think so.
You are scum enough to me, trying to ease your way in making it not obvious that you are defending nameloc, but at the same time turning the tables to DK trying to form a bandwagon, makes me laugh.
Scott Brosius wrote:HellloooNewman wrote:
You attack DK, make it seem like you are ready to vote him......then vote Surye without a word as to why. Please explain.
This is a valid point. Plus the voting people over disagreements, not for scumminess. nameloc has looked somewhat better.
unvote
Vote: Toffee
HellloooNewman wrote:toffee wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:@RedCoyote
I will explain my vote, but if I did it now, than nameloc would have it way much easier.
@HeloooNewman
Also, notice how nameloc isn't posting as much, a bit scummy to me.
Unvote
Vote HellloooNewman
You sir, are fucking contradicting yourself. Earlier in the game, I had ask you TWO fucking questions, and you avoid them, and now you vote me for avoiding your fucking questions, DID I place a vote on you? No. I don't think so.
You are scum enough to me, trying to ease your way in making it not obvious that you are defending nameloc, but at the same time turning the tables to DK trying to form a bandwagon, makes me laugh.
God damnit! Can't you just re-read teh game? Your questions were silly! Especially the "hand raising" thing.
And what the hell w/ won't explaining your vote thing? Watching you bandwagoning here and there, just following the crowds, makes me worry, I think you need to re-state your scumread stance more clearly, I believe it's just not me who didn't understand what the hell you are at atm...
For now.. VOTE: Surye
You attack DK, make it seem like you are ready to vote him......then vote Surye without a word as to why. Please explain.
DeityKabuto wrote:Hmm... Toffee's style of play is even weirder than mine o.O
But eh... anyone else noticing how Newman and DemonHybrid seems to be buddying up?
It's not bad, but I'm just saying, it seems like their "voice" speaks the loudest of all, really persuasive, it would be really interesting if one of them turns out to be scum. *cough*- Newman (maybe)
DeityKabuto wrote:toffee wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:Hmm... Toffee's style of play is even weirder than mine o.O
But eh... anyone else noticing how Newman and DemonHybrid seems to be buddying up?
It's not bad, but I'm just saying, it seems like their "voice" speaks the loudest of all, really persuasive, it would be really interesting if one of them turns out to be scum. *cough*- Newman (maybe)
Hmmm, I'm quite sure you were voicing Newman as town (it's post #97), why the change of heart so sudden?
What's behind the read between Newman-scum and Newman-DH buddying up?
There is a hidden essence of "peculiar" inside of his posts. I am not saying he scum, but I could very well easily see him as one. I just do not like how DemonHybrid and Newman are buddying up to scumhunt. I'm pretty sure this game does not have Masons.
RedCoyote wrote:toffee 196 wrote:Deity's style of play I referred was his odd style in questioning people. While his votes history were quite alarming so far, I want to find out his true opinion 'bout all of his scumread and making sure if he's not just following the crowd.
Could you just state for us, very clearly, whether or not you think DK is scummy? There's no reason we should have to go through all this filler unless you're giving yourself leverage to backtrack. Do you understand?
DemonHybrid wrote:Do you just not care about our cases onyou? Do you realize that all of us are calling you, Surye and DK buddies?
DemonHybrid wrote:Here, let me speed things up:
toffee, what do you think of Deity's claim?
RedCoyote wrote:don 299 wrote:i would argue against the claim, but with the hider dead, hider tracker is confirmed town, no? although i still think it may be wise for ht to lay low unless they have a scum result. what does everyone think?
What we should do is have the Hider Tracker voting their scum result (if they have one) and trying to get their lynch through going that route first. If the Hider Tracker can successfully get a lynch through without claiming, then they can claim tomorrow and the town will be in a much better position.
Amrun wrote:Um, HT does have a scum result. Otherwise, I would not advocate him coming out.
Obviously, there is a small chance DG hid behind the vig, but that's unlikely and if that happens, they'll just both have to claim. It's worth it.
VOTE: toffee
RedCoyote wrote:Amrun 320 wrote:What about toffee? Didn't you suspect him?
I do, and I think she would be a good alternative lynch for the awkward way she joined the DK wagon.
smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:aside from that, I'm anxiously awaiting toffee's stance on what happened at night, and the wagons toDay. also, scott and dj, i really want to start seeing more from you. I'm thinking one of you is the last scum scum slot, and neither of you is looking particularly townie to me right now. step it up. post more. do move than vote.