OPEN 281 C9++ day 4

Chronopie · Post Post #14 (isolation #0) » Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:01 pm

Well there's clearly a Doc. And a Vig or SK. (Or maybe just an KillImm SK).

VOTE: Shotty For his being Shotty.

Chronopie · Post Post #23 (isolation #1) » Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:12 pm

Signing as

-The Baker

doesn't really hide anything. Considering it's your main accounts title.

When do we see

-The Butcher?

Chronopie · Post Post #31 (isolation #2) » Thu Feb 10, 2011 7:32 pm

The Master Hand wrote:
EVERYONE: Please answer the following.

1. What alignment do you prefer? Town, Mafia, Serial Killer, or other 3rd Party?
2. What types of roles do you prefer?
3. Would you rather be in a Masonry or a Cult?
4. How many games of mafia have you played/ had any prior experience? (Rough estimate is fine, I just want to judge experience levels.)

1) SK - SSBF Mafia was good
2) Killing roles
3) Cult - Succession was also good. (and I have a terribad track record as Mason)
4) I don't count, but enough. >30 though.

5) When he/she is close to a lynch, or in a 1v1.

Chronopie · Post Post #88 (isolation #3) » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:27 am

So Edge and TMH are Town, tans is prob town, Magnetic is prob scum, Park is Null-scummy, Escho is null-scummy, Shotty is... Shotty.

everyone else is Null

--

Not sure what Cookie has against me.

Chronopie · Post Post #169 (isolation #4) » Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:10 pm

/prodded.

Not sure why Park claimed, likely poorly thought out, but with good intentions. Moves up the Town list.

As for the TMH defense, I've played with Andy before (Both Alignments), and his play changes enough to allow me to be reasonably sure this is a town Andy.

Chronopie · Post Post #315 (isolation #5) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:49 am

Lets throw some more Setup spec into the mix. We have at least one M.

Claim/Reveal: Innocent Child

Chronopie · Post Post #316 (isolation #6) » Tue Feb 22, 2011 10:51 am

and ftr: Sig.

Chronopie · Post Post #368 (isolation #7) » Sat Feb 26, 2011 12:39 pm

Chronopie wrote:and ftr: Sig.

Semi-V/LA for a few days

But anyway. /prodded.

--

MDVV

XYZ

We have two claimed Vigs. With the above confirmed 4 roles, that would require a

MDVV

VV

X

.
And we have two other claimed PRs.

Impossible

, assuming both claimed, but non-specified PRs

ARE

town. Therefore, either One of the "Vigs" is Scum/SK, or one of the unspecified PRs is.

Given we have two claimed other PRs (assuming One Vig, One SK), the only way for an SK in the setup is for

0 Ts

to have been generated. In which case we have another, undeclared PR.

MDVV

XX

A

--

tl;dr We cannot have Two Full Vigs and Two Other Town PRs.

Chronopie · Post Post #379 (isolation #8) » Sun Feb 27, 2011 7:22 am

Think of it like this: If you ARE a vig, this is the most pro-town move you can make. If Shotty dies, and flips non-vig, you killed a VI. If you die, and Shotty doesn't, he's 95% SK, and gets lynched ft-town-win.

OTOH: You don't shoot at shotty at all, we lynch you ourselves. If you're town, that's a deliberate mislynch forced by you not shooting.

And ofc If he and you BOTH die, then one of the other claimed, but unrevealed PRs are making stuff up, and we lynch them.

Chronopie · Post Post #384 (isolation #9) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:50 am

VOTE: No Lynch

Here's why. You don't follow the plan = We'll lynch you ourselves. If you're town, then your inaction would result in a mislynch. If you follow the plan, you may reveal an SK, or shoot a mafiate.

Chronopie · Post Post #389 (isolation #10) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:38 pm

Backup Doc means 2 Ds in the setup

MDVVDD

X

New revised List. One of the "Vigs" are lying. If not both.

Shotty: Who did you target?

PR: Who did you target?

Chronopie · Post Post #390 (isolation #11) » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:40 pm

Chronopie wrote:Backup Doc means 2 Ds in the setup

MDDVV
XY

New revised List. One of the "Vigs" are probably lying. If not both.

Shotty: Who did you target?

PR: Who did you target?

EBWOP: Removed excess D.

Chronopie · Post Post #410 (isolation #12) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:08 pm

Doctor and Backup Doctor...

DD

Vig + OS Vig

VV

Innocent Child

M

SK either none or 2 0s. ??/

TT

Escho Claimed VT, Cookie claimed PR. The Scum roles aren't drawn from the same Dice rolls, and due to there being an SK, we can't have just one left over PR...

So Cookie must have been lying.

VOTE: Cookie (Dear god I hope he wasn't a lying VT, rather than Lying scum.)

Chronopie · Post Post #413 (isolation #13) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:12 pm

And I'd been calling TMH Town since D1. I told you I can read Andy.

--

P.Edit: And no-one claimed Miller.

P.P.Edit: Dear god. CC is a single Sane Cop, no Millers. Escho, you had better not be scum.

Chronopie · Post Post #419 (isolation #14) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:19 pm

Chronopie wrote:As for the TMH defense, I've played with Andy before (Both Alignments), and his play changes enough to allow me to be reasonably sure this is a town Andy.

QFT

Chronopie · Post Post #420 (isolation #15) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:21 pm

Miller Townie that shows up Scum to a Cop.

Chronopie · Post Post #424 (isolation #16) » Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:05 pm

Really, Scum had a double edged sword of who to kill last night. Mod-confirmed Town Innocent Child, or Vig confirmed by means of cc'ing the SK.

Chronopie · Post Post #451 (isolation #17) » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:12 pm

Next game I mod, Magnetic is now disbarred for the above comment.