So first, let's talk about that meta (if only so I can feel self righteous).
Fate wrote:I DIDNT PRESSURE AV ONCE. I CALLED HIM SCUM OFFHAND BECAUSE EVERYONE KNEW HE WAS SCUM, BUT YEAH I NEVER VOTED HIM.
Fate in DEFCON Mafia 2.0 wrote:SCANNING: AURROUSVOXIEST ISO.
ORIGINAL CONTENT FOUND: ZERO.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: AUROUSVOX
DIEDIEDIEDIE
Fate wrote:PROOF THAT AURUOUSVOX IS HIS BUDDY. HE FUCKING KNEW INHIM WAS SCUM BEFORE IT WAS POPULAR, AND HE TRIED TO LINK IT TO ME BEING SCUM WITH HIM.
BURN THIS MOTHER FUCKER.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: AUROUSVOX
Fate wrote:SCUM
SCUMS
SCUMSCUMSUCJSMUMSC
AUROUSMCSTALIX
KITOCHECKOV
G
G
.
THIS WINS GUARANTEED. TOMORROW HAVE A BUNCH OF THESE COMMIES NUKE CHESSKID.
TODAY HAVE SCUMPR LYNCHED.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: AV
WIN WIN
And this was a game with an army of dayvigs, so by repeatedly calling someone scum (even if you are not voting for them), you are significantly increasing their chances of being killed (if not lynched). I'm not even going to bother to get all the quotes where you SCREAM IN CAPS LAWK that AV is scum because it happens at least 2-3x per page.
---
But that's not even the MEAT of the argument. This is a sideshow. And that's something I realized when I slept on this - you keep trying to sidetrack the discussion away from my ACTUAL argument, which is as follows (for clarity, in case people don't want to read the last two pages):
You intentionally posted a bad, poorly developed argument knowing that I would call it bullshit. You did this on purpose because you planned to then call me out on overreacting and use
whatever I said
as ammunition to start a giant war in which you would try to make me look scummy by using whatever means necessary.
After I called you out this, you repeatedly tried to weasel your way out of explaining yourself with excuses. First you say the argument was inconsequential. I ask why you posted it, then. You said "Hoopla wanted me to." This, however, contradicts with the fact that you explicitly stated you were waiting for me to return, which implies you
wanted to argue with me about it
, not sweep it away. When I ask why you posted such a poorly developed argument, you say "I was tired." You didn't mention that in the post, though - you threw it on later. And you certainly seemed very alert and ready to jump down my throat the second I posted a very reasonable, predictable response to your bullshit argument. So I'm sorry if I do not believe any of your excuses - I think you WANTED to make that poorly developed argument, you WANTED me to be there when you did it, and you WANTED me to call it bullshit so you could jump down my throat and spark a giant war.
Now, I'm PRETTY sure that you are doing this because you want to abandon the bus on Empking. That's the point of the meta analysis. However, even if Empking is town, you are still scum trying to set up a mislynch using crappy logic.
With regards to your "You didn't move your vote an appropriate time" argument - I have already explained why this is false. I do not need to move my vote to make my advocacy clear. We were in the middle of a heated debate. If I had parked my vote on Empking for days while repeatedly calling him town, then yes, that would have been scummy. It's NOT scummy to have your vote on somebody for a few minutes while you try and nail down what you think about a particular situation. That is a massive stretch.
That said, now that I've thought about it, I am much more certain you are scum than Empking, so I'm moving my vote. LIKE YOU WANTED.
Unvote. Vote: Fate