and yeah,
also, confid, you know you contributed to that wagon too. why put a third vote on a person in RVS with no real reason?
Alright, I understand that you wanted to make a joke, but you're also starting a wagon on a player for no reason.ConfidAnon wrote:Because I had the best joke for him because of his avatar.smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:/confirm
and yeah,vote Crilly, four votes for one person in RVS is bad. why'd you vote empking?
also, confid, you know you contributed to that wagon too. why put a third vote on a person in RVS with no real reason?
If I took the number of votes on a person into account when I placed an RVS vote, it wouldn't be an RVS vote.
Fair enough.ConfidAnon wrote: I don't really see an issue with that. It's the RVS. A third vote wasn't going to make anyone get lynched, and I certainly wasn't pushing for that.
Which would be why I find Crilly's post scummy - he seems to have been pushing for that wagon to go places it never should when it's an RVS wagon.