Revenge?Fate wrote:I'm so glad I get to get revenge on Empkingscum.
Weak. Weak. Vague. Weak. Weak. Weak. Scummy. Cryptic. Weak. Weak. Not scumhunting. Weak. Weak. Active Lurking. Weak.parknourie wrote:For someone going V/LA for a single day, your participation in this game is quite intriguing Empking.
Yes.Hoopla wrote:That's underwhelming. Did you read the entire game before coming up with those reads?Empking wrote:I copied the list from the mod's first post. The asterisk comes from there.
(bold mine)I don't like this wagon...not yet.
Why would town add that?Totally agree with flinter's analysis. Was going to point out that exact thing but I wanted to give Abelcain time to incriminate himself more thoroughly.
Why isn't PN scum? Seriously, I agree with your last paragraph but PN is the obvscum.Fate wrote:There's nothing that's got me riled up. Andrius' flaking pissed me off, but he's not here.
Basically I caught Andrius as scum a good ten pages ago and the game has been stalling around him being lynched this whole time.
This set-up really isn't that hard people. Obvscum people usually are obvscum.
Y'know the foolproof way to keep from lynching a Mason is to always No Lynch.Albert B. Rampage wrote:I rather lynch him now than risk to out a mason and have him or her NK'd tonight if you catch my drift...
I presume Nacho agrees with me?
This looks really weak.AlmasterGM wrote:You're smarter than that, Fate, and we both know it. Yes, if Empking is town, you could just get him lynched. That's a great plan for newbie scum in the newbie queue. But it's not a good long-term strategy, because Empking flipping town doesn't mean game over. To the contrary, it leaves you in a post-flip world where 1) you look really bad, seeing as you championed Empking-scum and 2) you'll be running dry (seeing as, until recently, you haven't done much that wasn't centered around Empking). You NEED your mislynch engine to be already running full-steam ahead on another target. That way, you can string the lynches along without letting anyone pause, think, and turn their suspicions somewhere you don't want them to be.Fate wrote:Your case will never fly. You're pulling ALL DIS SCUMMETAZZ out of your ass and then throwing in a, Well EVEN if hes not bussing and Empking is town, FATES STILL SCUM EITHER WAY EHHEHAHAHAHAHAHA. Which is BS because there would be NO NEED for me to "spark" some giant flamewar between you and I if I could just get Empking lynched.
And that's just Empking-town world. Empking-scum world makes just as much sense. AND OH LOOK, here he is now to try and add a little credence to his buddy's wagon.
I don't see it. I've got a town read on him, so no.Hoopla wrote:I find his play ridiculously anti-town, and I guess I find it scummy too. I would be open to wagoning him if this is what you're suggesting, but he isn't my number one pick. Would you vote flinter?Empking wrote:Oyh yeah, coasting is also something I would call null if it leads to the player replacing out. The thing that causes the coasting is the same thing that causes the replacing out.
Hoopla: You find NS scummy, right?
I agree with the last sentance of this post whole-heartedly.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I still think Empking needs to die; but I have no problem lynching Fate to shut him up. I mean he's being assisted by several other players, but he's right on track to destroy the game.
Quote where I said we should lynch you?Fate wrote:I'm not sure how anyone can be blind enough to say I'm destroying the game, where in nearly every game I've been in scum have considered me a threat.
But oh look at this NO POSTINGS. And oh look at Empking SCUMMING IT UP!
Empking your vote is on AGM, hence you would THINK you agreed with my case on him and think him a worthy lynch based off my play.
How can you be TOWN and also think "yeah and we should lynch Fate hes destroying the game" when your VOTE is being placed based of my actions?
LOLSCUM BUDDYING DDD