Rereading.
/stereotypical replacement intro
That's just useless fluff that looks like you're doing something. Try harder.Mr. Chaos wrote:Is pretty much total defeatism and I dislike it. But it also gives me a small town vibe as well, which doesn't sit well with me either.
Ooh, a pressure vote on a lurker?! That's real good scumhunting you're doing there.I really think though, that Crono needs to get in this game more. I would really like to hear more from him, and I feel the only way may be to:
Vote: Chrono
Mr. Chaos wrote:Chronopie wrote:You be in my head, posting my ideas.
Active lurking is anti-town, anti-town actions are scummy, therefore active-lurking is scummy.
.....That's all your gonna say? Some pretty exciting things have been happening, and all you can think to do is agree with something I posted?
These two posts happened BACK-TO-BACK. "Decent townish vibe?" Could you be more contradictory? Couple that with a wagony vote on Beefster and you get yourself scum.Mr. Chaos wrote:Crono's recent posts are giving me a decent townish vibe, but Beefster's style has been crashing hard. I would rather see Beef try and actually hunt than vote ignorantly.
Unvote; Vote: Beefster
Totally agree with this. I don't think his buddy would jump to bus him that fast - the other faction, though, definitely would.XScorpion wrote:While beefster looks like obv. scum at this point, the people who are hurriedly jumping to his wagon could easily be on the other faction.
So let's see what you've got here:Chevre wrote:That is the entire post, and in red is what Karma quoted. Karma pinpointed one part of a much larger post as "fluff."Mr. Chaos ISOpost 8 (quoted in it's entirety) wrote:Considering the style of VI your playing as. It deviates from the normal VI I would expect to appear, and sort of rocks in this gray area between VI and Normal play.easjo682 wrote:how does this effect anything, what you mean when you say considering its me?Chaos wrote:I'm not debating whether or not this was planned or not, considering we're talking about easjo.
XScorpion wrote:Hey Mr. Chaos, who is scum?you
In all seriousness, I dislike Elscouta's and Chrono's play. I'm really more likely to vote for them than some others. I won't lie when I say I feel like my reads this game are totally off balanced, and I really dislike my play this game as well.
I dislike the inHim wagon, but I'm not entirely opposed to it. From what I've seen of his play, its not too far off, but it strikes me a little bit odd. Also this post:OK, an actual attempt at scumhunting will come today. Lynch me otherwise.Is pretty much total defeatism and I dislike it. But it also gives me a small town vibe as well, which doesn't sit well with me either.
I really think though, that Crono needs to get in this game more. I would really like to hear more from him, and I feel the only way may be to:
Vote: Chrono
The next point of Karma's case comes from the same post, actually, and it is just another tidbit.
Finally, the "contradiction." While it is awkward that Mr. Chaos would post those two things back to back, it is not necessarily contradictory. Contribution and townieness don't have to be linked.
All in all, I find Karma's case on Mr. Chaos is poor, and XScorpion's follow-up looks like extreme buddying now.
Vote: Karma, with XScorpion as most likely partner. I would also like to acknowledge that Beefster is my second suspect, with inHim as his most likely partner.
Secondly, here's what happened:Chevre wrote:Finally, the "contradiction." While it is awkward that Mr. Chaos would post those two things back to back, it is not necessarily contradictory. Contribution and townieness don't have to be linked.
Chronopie wrote:@Inhim: I too would like to hear why I make this scumlist.
Chronopie wrote:@xScorpion: My top picks right now would be Elscouta, Sandman, and two of CA, Slepz, Inhim, and Easjo
Chronopie wrote:
You be in my head, posting my ideas.
Active lurking is anti-town, anti-town actions are scummy, therefore active-lurking is scummy.
Chronopie wrote: @ODDin: I agree that many find Active lurking to be just anti-town, and pure theory discussion is unproductive, but in <ongoing - redacted> it's actually taken out<ongoing - redacted>several scum.
@Scott: No, I'm fine with standard mafia platitudes right now.
--
Beefster's erroneous conclusion suggests only a few possibilities to me: 1) Scumbuddies, 2) Scum that knows Scott is town (or at least not on the same team), thus"Not on my scumlist"because he knows who's scum (at least part), or 3) newb-town.
Is that a superbly pro-town player to you? Are those posts good enough reason to shamelessly wagon on Beefster?Chronopie wrote:personally, #1 or #2 seems most likely.
Putting my vote where my gut is at:
Unvote, Vote: Beefster