An analysis of this set up.
The first thing I want to point something out about this set up. In normal c-9 or f-11 set ups, the scum has a substantial amount of information. You know who all of the townies are, and in f-11 if you are both goons you know there is only one PR. If Scum has a roleblocker and on PR bites the dust, they know the other role is present.
In this game scum does not have absolute knowledge. Fate you mention
Fate wrote:
Who is pretty sure about anything D1? Oh yeah, that's right. Scum. They already know 2/12 roles...
The "wagon leader" is the player with the most votes. Sorry for the confusion.
But in this game, scum knows only one thing no one else does, who their scum partner is.
Tho I agree Shrine is very premature to think he knows anything about tracker, this indicates ignorance more than scumminess. Remember, scum is also scumhunting. That being said, I want everyone to understand that in this set up, bussing is meaningless (shy one scenario I will discuss in a second).
People bus their partner to try and gain credibility to the town, or because not doing so would make them look suspicious. In f-11, hard mode bussing is providing the evidence to lynch your scum partner, knowing fully well that you are incriminating your scum partner and hoping this will make you look good to the town, and later it is up to them to try and establish whether or not you were bussing your partner. In this set up, if person A provides evidence for the lynch of person b, and person B is scum, we as a town cannot know whether or not that wagon was pushed based on knowledge (person A is scum partner) or on suspicion (person A could be different scum party). So person A does not gain townie points for enabling the lynch of scum. The exception to this is when one team has been eliminated, bussing functions as normal.
As for who has what knowledge, the faction with the most knowledge is the masons. They know who not to vote for.
@ Rayfrost and others, When DKU said "I did not take him seriously" I believe what DKU meant was "I did not think he was actually advocating for a self lynch", though the mention of a jester like role possibility seems a bit fishy, playing dumb for an open set up.
As for Yawetag, his suggestiong that DKU may be a mason was a misguided comment, but I doubt it was mason fishing.
for Flareonage, the
Flareonage wrote:Unvote
VOTE: SaintKerrigan
Dana brought up valid points thus your vote is pointless
Is not suspicious, though the vote against SK was misguided. Sk was confused as to what DKU was saying about taking xreck seriously. Flare understood what DKU was trying to say, and agreed with the points DKU made (however newbish they may be), and flare thought that SK was scummy for voting DKU on the points DKU made, which is not why SK was voting DKU at all.
In summary, Flare and yawetag, not scummy. DKU not particularly scummy. Who is scummy? Xreck.
Xreckoner pushed for yawetag by straw man-ing that he was mason fishing, and after it was clear that his argument against yawetag was going to fall apart, he then chose to push the wagon back to somewhere it seemed like it would stick. His "That's why we need to lynch Flare. " makes no sense to me. I feel like he is trying to push anything that will stick, and quickly.
Vote: xRECKONERx