Alright.In post 9, DonCorleone wrote:hardclaim cop
Yeah, I’m as surprised to have got it as you all are, what can I say, luck of the Irish
I know that this role is accounted for.Cop OR 1-Shot Redirector
needs to claim today. This is the role that scum like to go for, and the worst thing that can happen to that role - being redirected - can't happen to it.1-Shot Vigilante OR 1-Shot PGO (active)
To clarify, there is a cop claim, so vigilante has no reason to hide their role.In post 39, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think fear of being roleblocked justifies not claiming that role here
Then why do you townread him?In post 46, skitter30 wrote:also i thought the cop-claim was a meme?
In post 15, Farkset wrote:I actually talked about it with farkran yesterday and this the most likely scenario. 2nd picker thinks that 1st most likely took cop and don't want to end up as vanilla as high picker. 3rd thinks in similar way. 4th and later think that they are too low to get cop and {1, 2, 3} took it for sure.In post 9, DonCorleone wrote:hardclaim cop
Yeah, I’m as surprised to have got it as you all are, what can I say, luck of the Irish
As result it if 1 refuse to pick it then no one does but there are some odds for last picker to catch it.
Why didn't you pick cop?In post 22, Farkset wrote:Hello
We did not get our pick.
VOTE: skitter why didn't you pick 42?
-Farkran
And if mafia has a roleblocker, they have to choose between the cop claim and the vigilante claimIn post 85, skitter30 wrote:Although could u explain the logic again?In post 76, Dunnstral wrote:Why would you be fake claiming cop as town? Why would I assume you're town?
I'm not sure what you're getting at. If you retract your claim I'll retract my wanting the vig to claim, otherwise it is essential we get that claim today.
If he's cop there isnt a redirector so we dont need to worry about redirector shenanigans with the vig/pgo slot
It's not more likely for somebody who picked 2 to be scum, though, even from skitter's povIn post 192, alimdia wrote: you mentioned that theory, yet you didn't vote for the other people that picked 2. Logically you would say you are town, and hence its likely one of the other 2 are scum.
so...
skitter
Maybe they don't share my opinion because they're scum.In post 401, Farkset wrote:but as you see vig/pgo doesn't share your opinion, we can step forward from itIn post 399, Dunnstral wrote:I still think the 1-shot vig should claim; I think worrying about scum hitting a town pgo is a weak point (I don't think town is mor elikely to pick pgo than vig, anyway)
~ker
Cop claim on the first pageIn post 605, Iconeum wrote:any claims so far?
Why?In post 621, Farkset wrote:This is quite a bad post for many reasons, Dunn.In post 615, Dunnstral wrote:I'll leave Don be for today. Be careful with night actions targeting him, he could be scum pgo, as I've explained.
VOTE: brassherald
I'm not sure how I feel about aldus.
Poe read, kind of
Please take a stance on aldus.
-Farkran
Because they look like town. Also, Datisi has the number 1, I wouldn't lynch there until I had better reads on other 1 pickers anywayIn post 709, Iconeum wrote:gonna be honest haven't read everything, but especially skitter and datisi townreads can you expand on those? Really curious what exactly makes you townread them.In post 703, Dunnstral wrote:Why?In post 621, Farkset wrote:This is quite a bad post for many reasons, Dunn.In post 615, Dunnstral wrote:I'll leave Don be for today. Be careful with night actions targeting him, he could be scum pgo, as I've explained.
VOTE: brassherald
I'm not sure how I feel about aldus.
Poe read, kind of
Please take a stance on aldus.
-Farkran
I'm not convinced that he's scum
My very rough reads are something like Farkset, Melody, Skitter, JacksonVirgo, Datisi as towny people
I've tried to pick neighborizor as like, 4th pick as town in a previous run of this setup, and I still didn't get it (another town took it)
I mean, not really. Target someone who you suspect is a town power role, and maybe they will trust you and give you information - I think that's your best usage of the pr.In post 821, Doctor Drew wrote:Don't you thinks is valuable for me to hood someone?
Until said neighborizer starts, you know, neighborizing people, and it's not the guy who claimed the roleIn post 854, Farkset wrote:The real neighborizer could be a lower scum pick and he won't get counterclaimed
My thinking that there's only 1 scum in the pool of players who picked the number 1, while simultaneously being more wary of Don and Iconeum than I am of DatisiIn post 900, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:What special about number 1?In post 817, Dunnstral wrote:Because they look like town. Also, Datisi has the number 1, I wouldn't lynch there until I had better reads on other 1 pickers anyway
Scum has no reason to do that, unless they're trying to hide that Doctor Drew has the 1-shot vigilante or pgo role specifically, so that they can freely kill someone. But even then, They're setting themself up to be lynched down the road.In post 903, alimdia wrote:Farkset brings up a valid point that doctor scum could have claimed neighbouriser, that one of his lower scum buddies have picked.
THat seems like a genuine thought, even if Dunnstral slightly disproves it.
But the neighbouriser can still claim to have neighbourised someone dead, or their buddy etc.
None of my posts have been fluff or jokes. It's scummy that you're trying to push that forwardIn post 1028, alimdia wrote:1) You have more posts in number than me sure, but most of them is fluff, jokes, things that people in either alignment would say and generally fence-sitting.
Jackson - I thought they were town early on, their continued doing nothing has them more at null for meIn post 1032, alimdia wrote:You've avoided taking a stand on Aldu, until someone explicited asked, and then you went with the above.In post 956, Dunnstral wrote:Alduskkel feels kind of genuine in their recent posts. Maybe I'm just a sucker, but are we sure about this one? I'm not into lynching Melody, either
You don't like the Melody wagon. Why? Your ISO just says you have melody as town with little reasoning. 399
What's wrong with the Brass wagon (not that its a big wagon) Why? The replacement hasn't done jack?
What are your thoughts on Jackson?
It doesn't matter this late into the day.In post 1052, skitter30 wrote:we don't even know a vig exists tho
i'm sorry can you just break down your logic for why the vig should claim again, i'm not really sure i understood it in the first place
What if that's not helpful?In post 1077, Doctor Drew wrote:You have my word that if you flip town I will point and angry finger at Skitter.
Same could be said for youIn post 1081, DonCorleone wrote:I’m sceptical that you got something that low down in the draft
Dr drew claims neighborizorIn post 1192, DonCorleone wrote:But if scum lower down got neighbouriser or fruit vendor then he can safeclaim that.
Oh look, the first thing scum drafted was the 1-shot vigilante!In post 1142, Alduskkel wrote:This game is a frustrating shitshow. Feels like a goddamn repeat of the last time I played Pick Your Power.
We already talked about thisIn post 1192, DonCorleone wrote:As in, if drew got roleblocker then he can’t claim doctor and explain why he’s not dead. But if scum lower down got neighbouriser or fruit vendor then he can safeclaim that. I’m really not seeing how the claim makes him town given that he could just... be lying?
VOTE: Doctor PepperIn post 57, Dunnstral wrote:Actually I see where you're coming from.
Moving on: anyone else think 11 and 19 are scummy numbers?
Let's wait to see if he keeps this upIn post 1279, Doctor Drew wrote:Who did you investigate?In post 1277, Dunnstral wrote:I counter claim cop
The real difference is that I only asked for one of those roles to claimIn post 1274, JacksonVirgo wrote:What's the real difference except when you can shoot?In post 1260, skitter30 wrote:also n3 vig and 1s vig are different rolesIn post 1258, Farkset wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral, i think it's better to prioritize this given how much he insisted about the vig pick which was just now confirmed picked by town.
This sentence applies to DC. You guys allowed him the freedom to decide whether he was going to cc cop today or not.In post 1284, Farkset wrote:I mean if scum couldn't pick neither doc nor cop, they need to lynch the cop now otherwise it's pretty much autoloss for them. A counterclaim from scum in bad position seems the logical choice if this is the case.
Then we can lynch outside of the claims & outside of the 1's and see what happens.In post 1284, Farkset wrote:they need to lynch the cop now otherwise it's pretty much autoloss for them.
He was allowed to half-claim cop yesterday, even though he really shouldn't have beenIn post 1286, Doctor Drew wrote:Explain what you mean?In post 1285, Dunnstral wrote:This sentence applies to DC. You guys allowed him the freedom to decide whether he was going to cc cop today or not.In post 1284, Farkset wrote:I mean if scum couldn't pick neither doc nor cop, they need to lynch the cop now otherwise it's pretty much autoloss for them. A counterclaim from scum in bad position seems the logical choice if this is the case.
In post 159, Doctor Drew wrote:Dunn seems to be overthinking the cop claim a bit(ftr, I don't love the timing of the claim but I want to let it breath a bit), but I do think Don is twisting Dunn's words and assuming his intentions a bit. I lean town on Dunn. And since I mentioned them, null to slight scum on Don, but as I said I want the claim to breath a bit before I am moved one way or another.