That draft lol
I think that it's unlikely that there's more than one scum in any given set of multiples
I also think its low-key unlikely for there to be more than 1 scum in the 1's and 2's combined
Also i dont think people should claim thinga like this just yet, it gives wolves info and helps narrow things downIn post 22, Farkset wrote:We did not get our pick.
There's literally no way you can have this much info yetIn post 26, Farkset wrote:Sorry, i only skimmed posts, didn't notice 42 anywhere and i didn't connect the thoughts processes.
I wouldn't think it's AI though, and i have reasons to think that the top 4 slots are all town, so i'm fine voting down below so far
-Farkran
pedit: i don't believe scum needs this kind of info
In post 30, DonCorleone wrote:@datisi, I strongly suspect that if skitter is scum that that statement was made as pure WIFOM. I personally disagree with her lowkey idea (I don't know why it's unlikely that scum would choose in both 1 and 2?) but agree that it's unlikely 2 scum would have picked the same number.
- not sure why you're voting me over not picking 42 (admittedly could be nai and an rvs joke-post but you doubled down a bit later so i'd like to hear more about it)
not checking alignments ^In post 21, DonCorleone wrote:I looked at the last five (+venrob's) to try and predict what numbers were most likely to come up and to get a good position.Worked out well lol. I actually didn't check alignments, so I didn't realise you were scum in the previous games, meaning that your shift is less concerning and maybe actually a good thing but I'm not gonna give you that much credit for it.
it was going the other way around, but the same principle applied ^Sirfetchd wrote:Yo duck. I have meta from a marketplace game showing scum riding picking the same number to endgame. I think everything is NAI unless there is single person meta reasons to read in to it.
I did mention a soft draft PICKs reason to suss one of rb or flubb, and rb flipping cop puts that solely on flubb.That said, I remember not reading Billy, so I think it's a little bit NAI on the didn't mention X. Flubb can be scum for other reasons like the momentum vote and draft picks. I know I tend to ignore half the list in any game over 11-12 players until I settle in.
I have a large amount of town reads which makes me think that probably a better route to go down. People I have not paid attention to that are alive are Flubb, Aaron, Kerset, and Suji. So if I can be fucked, I'll read them maybe.
scum picked it in the worst's gameIn post 66, DonCorleone wrote:Plus I don't think his "scum would take the 1s vig or PGO much more than town" is valid, especially now that I've had a look at (only venrob's so far) and seen that the very first pick was town and went for PGO
Idk, i dont think he'd take the approach to try to get vig/pgo to claim rn as scumIn post 72, DonCorleone wrote:Why is Dunn lowkey townie?
Although could u explain the logic again?In post 76, Dunnstral wrote:Why would you be fake claiming cop as town? Why would I assume you're town?
I'm not sure what you're getting at. If you retract your claim I'll retract my wanting the vig to claim, otherwise it is essential we get that claim today.
he thought he could bait people to visit him and then alert and then kill a bunch of peopleIn post 77, DonCorleone wrote:okay, so I just looked and can see that AP picked it, which I feel is probably not generalisable to what a scum mindset might be due to AP's... idiosyncrasies. You were on a team with him, why did he go for it?In post 70, skitter30 wrote:scum picked it in the worst's game
?In post 94, Farkset wrote:Skitter, i think you know where i come from and what i'm trying to do here.
(also just btw a better word in this context in english would be 'linked'; only saying this cuz a few non-english speakers recently indicated to me they would find it helpful if things like this were pointed out, but feel free to ignore if this is annoying or unhelpful)In post 91, Farkset wrote:*binded
i was scum in one of your newbies. I'm not sure what you mean by what you're trying to do here thoIn post 101, Farkset wrote:Do you know me, @cat?
Do you not? It's ok if you don't. Actually it will work better if you don't.In post 98, skitter30 wrote:?In post 94, Farkset wrote:Skitter, i think you know where i come from and what i'm trying to do here.
-Farkran
i have no idea what you're getting at, sorryIn post 109, Farkset wrote:@Skitter, what do i always do in games?
actually i'm not really sure i see that in jv hereIn post 168, Melody wrote:Jacko reads as pretty genuine. Scum wouldn't be so clueless over the process given they would've been discussing it in the PT.
a) this was not at all obviousIn post 174, Farkset wrote:Why are you saying that i omgussed you when i was clearly basing my game here on attracting votes to see who would cast one in bad faith?
a) yes scum can talk during the draftIn post 175, DoctorPepper wrote:*Sorry if I randomly reply to a lot of posts, playing on mobile gives me errors*In post 44, skitter30 wrote:like 1/2 are perceived as being risky by scum. i don't think they double-down and pick *two* numbers in that group
Clarification, can scum talk during the draft? This assumes that everyone here has played this set up and would know that nuance as well, right?
Otherwise, I'm thinking choice of number wouldn't be alignment indicative, right?
i kinda disagree with this assessmentIn post 183, DoctorPepper wrote:So far I'm thinking scum can be in [Farkset, Melody]
Wanna add Skitter in just as gut. I feel like her contributions to the game are mostly set up driven and not scum hunting driven.
i'm not saying that one of the multiples is scum, i'm saying that there's at most one scum in each set of multiples, which is not at all the same thingIn post 192, alimdia wrote:you mentioned that theory, yet you didn't vote for the other people that picked 2. Logically you would say you are town, and hence its likely one of the other 2 are scum.
so...
skitter
In post 203, DonCorleone wrote:If I'm honest I think it's generally not that worth it trying to sort skitter on D1, in reference to the short chat about her on page 5. I don't think skitter falls into the zone of inherently unsortable because she's so good at scum (not knocking her game) but just that I think she's the sort of person where you're very unlikely to catch her on tone, and much more based on what she's doing in the game and how she's positioned around things later on. Also, if she's town, there's always a pretty good chance she just eats a NK
oh huhIn post 237, Melody wrote:RCEnigma's alt is in this game. I'm not outing him.In post 235, Alduskkel wrote:Melody, I asked for scumreads and you only gave townreads...?
Also RC isn't in this game. (I'm prepared for a woooooosh if I'm missing an inside joke.)
~Dawn
oh?In post 258, JacksonVirgo wrote:I see Skitter as scum tbf, I'll post my replies to posts soon.
idk did you play on this site?In post 260, JacksonVirgo wrote:Oh? The game I played I only knew my buddies as Mafia and didn't have contact with them at all until after the Draft finished.
i just like don't get it, idkIn post 261, Melody wrote:Why do you disagree?
hmmmIn post 270, JacksonVirgo wrote:OH, sorry.In post 268, skitter30 wrote:i meant more: hi, why do you think i'm scummy here
I just get your posts as more manipulative and townie in a reverse-psychology way and I heard you were great at scum so I am extra cautious about each of your posts. Can't really put it into words
i guess i don't entirely understand why you're viewing it as a scummy voteIn post 274, Melody wrote:What about the Dunny vote; how is that reflective of his playstyle/personality, rather than him pursuing what he thinks is scummy?
nah that was a towngame, it's probably more winning dc and winning tm as scumIn post 277, Melody wrote:Are people scared of skitter because of her Moment of Brilliance? It's just one moment guys, pssh big deal.
~Dawn
also are you saying you agree with me about melody or that you agree with something melody said?In post 282, JacksonVirgo wrote:I agree with Melody, but are you saying that because you have good tone as scum that I'm wrong? :thonk:
a) i'm a sheIn post 287, alimdia wrote:he's just voting me cos I caught himIn post 257, skitter30 wrote:i'm not vibing the aldu votes really, i don't get why they're a thing
VOTE: almidiathanks broIn post 258, JacksonVirgo wrote:I see Skitter as scum tbf, I'll post my replies to posts soon.
tone, yeah (took a super long time to develop that as scum tho)In post 288, Melody wrote:I think part of skitter's success as scum are a lot of the takes she takes are vibes and gut ones, which are hard to read into. And since her tone seems to be NAI between alignments, you need to read her further down the line when she more content outside of that.
Kind of off-topic, but do you think that's a fair assessment, skitter?
~Dawn
i don't get it. why should i be voting for one of the other 2's hereIn post 294, alimdia wrote:My original thought process during drafting was that scum would send one of their own to pick '1', to cockblock the few town people that would pick '1'. So that's why I picked 2.
After skitter mentioned that there is at most 1 scum in [1] and [2] (which other people have disagreed on after), I thought that might have happened for the pick '2' as well.
The other wagons don't seem that great compared to this gut instinct I have, but I'll have a look at the others afterwards. tbh I just skimmed last night after I got a prod.
for probably the sixth time now, it did not happen in the last two iterations of the game; the lowest number any scum picked was 4; precisely because they were scared of colliding with townIn post 296, alimdia wrote:I happen to think its highly plausible that theres a scum in [1], and likely a scum in [2], unless someone shows me that doesn't really happen in the previous iterations of this game
they have no way of knowing that 3 townies would have picked 1 tho ...In post 301, alimdia wrote:But its still possible that for the [1] pick, 1 scum decided to sacrifice themselves getting a PR, but fuck over 3 other town in the process. Like 1 for 3 seems pretty worth right?
y thoIn post 321, Melody wrote:God, I find your tone so scummy, Drew :p
because he doesn't really seem to me to have done anything scummy for him so i assumed he's largely getting wagoned for playstyle reasonsIn post 342, Farkset wrote:Please talk to me more about aldusk, why do you think that the suspicion around him is personality based?
Or to be more specific, what's there to read him as anything above null now? Did you iso him in this game or do you have just a metabased weak read?
he's calling me scummy for saying that there's scum in the multiples and since i know i'm town in the 2's, for not voting any of the other 2'sIn post 344, Farkset wrote:What reasoning is bad, and why is that scummy? I don't know what you're referring to - the only valid options would be 192+213 and i'd like to hear more about why they are scummy when scum!almi could have joined any other general consensus read instead of headbutting into you. This does not townlock almidia but i don't see how it would place him below null either
why clemency?In post 349, Datisi wrote:@alimdia re 338, wasn't the "need to find another vote" saying they want to vote someone besides Drew?
@jackson, do you still think Melody is pocketing you even after they explained their thought process?
VOTE: clemency
you've played with him before?In post 357, Datisi wrote:and i feel like voting alimdia but my read rate on him is a flat 0%