[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13934802 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 888 | Welcome to Feryland! -- End! - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #20 (isolation #2) » Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:17 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 16, Cometbright wrote:
I know this isn't technically newbie's queue anymore but it might be helpful if we all know each other's general level of experience as I know this game was hosted sorta as a newbie-friendly setting.
This will be my fifth game on site (though the first two games were waaaay back in 2016 or so) so I would come under a Semi-Experienced label I think, but I definitely still feel like a bit of a greenhorn!
We apparently have 13 completed games over two accounts which simultaneously feels way smaller and way bigger than it should be
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
What a crazy coincidence, we're getting bad vibes from
In post 25, DragonEater70 wrote:
Also this is E-2 but am not unvoting because as you all know, being the first serious wagon is my specialty and I'm not going to give up the opportunity to get voted
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I dunno... picking on the newb without so much as a "hi" seeeeeems kinda scummy imo
VOTE: Gimli
I disagree that a naked vote is "picking on the newb" but that reaction feels very "why tf are you pushing me, I'm town?" energy so you can be town for now
I'm used to the idea of 48 hour days that end at 48 hours and never sooner, so... sorry if this sounds dense, but how does a "day" possibly last 10 calendar days? Or is it really rare for a day to go that long? What do we talk about on Day 1 for that long, lol?
The full 10 days tend to be used up, and normally there's a lot of back and forth, wheelin and dealin wagoneering with the occasional last minute funny flashwagon
In post 52, TimmerRC wrote:
Also, the idea of pressuring people with votes and then they role claim etc. That's a new dynamic for me, the bulk of my past play role claiming was never, ever allowed. So... traditionally, how does this play out? I'll have to get used to it, I was wired to consider that not a "fun" style of mafia.
I don't think anyone actually expects there to be a hammer or claim this early, RVS tends to be people just doing
stuff
until something townie or scummy happens and then people comment on that and then comment on the comments and reactions until it's turtles all the way down
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
We first did that style of posting in Weird Dreams Redux as town tho, and it's what got us to be the single most townread player d1. We mimic'd that in Open 880 cause it works great for getting townread but I don't actually think it's alignment indicative by itself (since it's in our natural townrange and our scumrange is wide enough to be able to mimic it) unless it's part of a larger vibe analysis that tries to find the actually scum indicative part of our posting which is
Post
Post #69 (isolation #16) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 12:35 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 59, Aneninen wrote:
Timmer.
A newer player with a lot of questions. If he had a scumbuddy, he'd have been given answers in their chat. Therefore,
Town
I can kinda see it unless his partner is also new
VOTE: Knott
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #99 (isolation #17) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 5:22 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 88, Kittiesecret wrote:
I know I know I read the newbie game play thingy, and RVS is a thing... buuuuuut Python was very bandwagony following votes, not just against me but others as well.
Yeah that's intentional, we don't actually care who gets wagoned this early on so we just jump on whatever wagons are happening to make number go up and let the people with actual opinions duke it out until we have something to work with
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #100 (isolation #18) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 5:25 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 98, Cometbright wrote:
My personal rule of thumb is that getting voted for is a lot more stressful for scum (as they know the town is right and are worried that town has noticed a slip-up/some mistake) than it is for town (who knows they are town and knows guaranteed that the person voting them has made some form of mistake/misinterpretation that they can rectify).
Post
Post #102 (isolation #19) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 5:33 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 93, Cometbright wrote:
How come Knott's being voted #69-#70? Didn't both of you say you disagreed with VIP's reads? Or did you agree with the Black wagon point?
Mostly POE. Gimli/Kittie/VIP are in my townpool, I'm town, we're not gonna get anything from Comet/Black/DE wagons rn and I'm fine with letting Tim cook so that just leaves Knott
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #109 (isolation #20) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 6:02 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 104, Afrayed Knott wrote:
You mean you don’t care? Why include the rest of us in that ‘we’? Of course it all depends on which ‘we’ you are referring to…. Is that a reasonable assumption?
We're plural, we use "we" to refer to ourselves as a system. Don't think we've used we in the "Python and another player" sense this game so far
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 121, usesPython wrote:
I don't think pressure voting Knott is giving us anything on them
VOTE: Black do something interesting
I think the opposite.
That's not a bad vote, though.
Knott seems like the type of player that doesn't handle pressure well and just ends up in a feedback loop of looking scummier and scummier regardless of their actual alignment
In post 128, Aneninen wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks Dragon's #125 and #127 added very little relevant content to the game? (Please, please, someone tell me how to make a link out of a post number! I simply can't remember that!) I guess I'll have hard time reading him.
[ post ]125[ /post ] without the spaces
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #178 (isolation #28) » Thu Oct 05, 2023 2:17 pm
Postby usesPython »
In post 176, Kittiesecret wrote:
From my post, Python and Gimli seem to have a little something going on. feels like more than "we have played together vibes."
Pretty sure we've never played with Gimli before
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #200 (isolation #29) » Fri Oct 06, 2023 12:41 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 191, Afrayed Knott wrote:
But reading Python is a little strange for me, like who is actually talking and how does this "we" work. Am I right is now understanding that there is more than one person on the other end of that keyboard?
One body, multiple people. You can treat it like a hydra I guess
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I'm brand new, lured here by my partner. I'm reading a couple games to see what it's all about, and am looking forward to my first game and dipping my toes in for realz!
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #206 (isolation #33) » Fri Oct 06, 2023 2:26 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 193, Aneninen wrote:
I didn't like Kittie's 157.
I can only see two excuses for not being involved with real reads. (1) It's too early and (2) You're a new player.
Can anyone tell me whether Kittie's playing in this way all the time?
Why is not having reads 24 hours into the game scum indicative?
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Post
Post #221 (isolation #34) » Sat Oct 07, 2023 2:28 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 219, Aneninen wrote:
Dragon, 217 and maybe everyone - you're the 3rd or 4th players with too-few-to-no scumreads. Is it only my mindset that has a different threshold on the concept "summy"?
We have a pretty low threshold day 1 where the only thing people need to do is give off a single townvibe, if everyone in the playerlist does that then we just sheep a strong townread that has OpinionsTM
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Yeah, after putting me on the "can pass", saying that Black was good enough as scum not to get caught on Day1, this deserves a thorough answer from me. Because of its lenght, it's best to format it like this:
Spoiler:
POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP!
Black's also a good enough town player that we're willing to let her cook
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
I read as much as I could which basically adds up to a summary of the claims, the start (page and a half maybe?) of Day 2 (or Day 3? - the one where the mafioso was voted out and Bianco was the first person to vote them), a bit of the day STD was voted out, and most of the VCs from Day 1 but zero actual content from it.
And obviously I read everything that happened after I repped in.
In post 99, usesPython wrote:
Yeah that's intentional, we don't actually care who gets wagoned this early on so we just jump on whatever wagons are happening to make number go up and let the people with actual opinions duke it out until we have something to work with
Post
Post #242 (isolation #42) » Sun Oct 08, 2023 1:14 am
Postby usesPython »
In post 239, DragonEater70 wrote:
Yes, I did read a bit from your PT - that's where I took the term react YouTuber from, lol. But I don't really understand why is that important. Do you think it's alignment indicative for me to have missed something you said?
Nah I don't think forgetting is alignment indicative, we were mostly just posting that to see if you'd react with anything that isn't "I forgor "
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 212, Kittiesecret wrote:
To add clarification to this, my partner plays else where with an experienced group. When I showed interest in wanting to play too, he directed me to this site because they have space for newbs to learn the ropes instead of jumping in cold to a game with a bunch of players who all know each other... which it seems I wasn't able to avoid.
lol that's actually unfortunate, but only 55% percent of us know each other, the other 44% are complete strangers.
(Hey Nameless [that's one of the people that compose Python], isn't my math both technically correct and extremely irritating at the same time?)
EBWOP
It's not technically correct because if you're rounding percentages then that should be 56%/44% or 55.6%/44.4% in the original
-Nameless
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 341, DragonEater70 wrote:
Python you wanted to generate content by jumping on wagons, didn't you? Let's do this.
VOTE: black
NOTE: DO NOT HAMMER BLACK OR YOU WILL BE POLICY LIMMED
So... you asked Python who they think the scum were. Python gave 3 names. You picked one of them - not even me who's closest to Elimination now -, then you launched a new wagon to E-1 it. The actual fork?
DE's the only person voting Black, she's not at E-1
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more