VOTE: Doctor Drew
I can't allow this. Getting executed D1 as SK would be pathetic.
VOTE: Doctor Drew
In post 10, Doctor Drew wrote: Also, I didn't even know Menal was in this game!
Excitement level just went up.
He's going to scumread me lol.In post 1164, Menalque wrote:I doIn post 1160, Alianna wrote: I voted redFF because I was mafia.nottownread Alianna*
*anymore and/or ever again
At least you can spell Alianna now.In post 15, Doctor Drew wrote: *(Also, I don't know how to spell simple words)
But I like cats too.In post 23, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Oh, all right
VOTE: Alianna
My vote is going nowhere.In post 24, Doctor Drew wrote:This is the type of attitude Allyuna could learn from.In post 23, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Oh, all right
VOTE: Alianna
Hello!In post 26, implosion wrote: why hello!
HI AISA DID YOU ROLL SK?In post 46, Aisa wrote: I am around now.
…exceptionally.
for two minutes until I thwack my head onto a pillow again.
I will be sometimes, but my brain is usually a bit dead at this time of night so coherence from me is not guaranteed. Actually, I don't think it's ever guaranteed lol.In post 45, sheepsaysmeep wrote: does this game have anyone who's usually around at this time of day lol that could be nice
In post 54, implosion wrote:What's this in response to?In post 52, Alianna wrote: I'm not willing to townlean anyone on the basis of "has reads" but I guess I won't complain about it too much.
The fact that at the time, you and sheep were the only two players to have stated serious reads.In post 63, Invisibility wrote:what posts led you to make that assumption?In post 55, Alianna wrote:Forgot to quote, this was in response to 50. Kind of assumed the reasoning based on what everyone had posted. Was it something else?In post 54, implosion wrote:What's this in response to?In post 52, Alianna wrote: I'm not willing to townlean anyone on the basis of "has reads" but I guess I won't complain about it too much.
Please do share.In post 60, Aisa wrote: I have 0-6 reads depending on how you define a “read”
Interesting take and I lean town on it at the moment. I feel like scum would be hesitant to post something like this for fear of getting called out for focusing on SK.In post 72, Andante wrote: If we have a serial killer, pretty sure it's implosion based on how he's playing, it reads to me as like "hey! tr me!!! look at my effort" and sk not knowing scum team? easy to do this
I can understand this if you don't know Aisa, but I don't think it's significant. At least, the reply to me is NAI.In post 78, Andante wrote:In post 49, Aisa wrote:Thanks. Limited edition Aisa is, indeed, even more exciting than normal Aisa. <3In post 47, sheepsaysmeep wrote: wow so excitingthese posts feel like scum just going for the "im friendly!! don't vote me" cardIn post 59, Aisa wrote:Hi ^^In post 51, Alianna wrote:HI AISAIn post 46, Aisa wrote: I am around now.
…exceptionally.
for two minutes until I thwack my head onto a pillow again.OMG YES!! WE BOTH ROLLED SK? There’s like a 1/676 chance of that, wow, that’s so rareDID YOU ROLL SK?
I'm not sure if you're implying anything with this post, but no, I am not intending to make a certain mistake twice.In post 86, Andante wrote: like mena, did you just toss alianna on e-1? and not say anything to speed hammer this? cause all I see are lots of votes there already...
In post 108, sheepsaysmeep wrote:this stuff felt slightly wolf to me at surface level.In post 52, Alianna wrote: I'm not willing to townlean anyone on the basis of "has reads" but I guess I won't complain about it too much.
"I won't complain about it too much" just feels like a wolf perspective in a way that I could see alianna slipping up. either about some correct townreads or wanting to get townread herself for an active start
the idea of town complaining about some page 2 reads just doesnt make sense to me, even if u disagree with the reads.what I would expect town to do is like, evaluate implosion's alignment based on that, which doesn't happen;this post also assumes implosion town in a +0.05% wolf way
idk ive been back and forth on this
Just a little annoyed at how some people townread what's just optimal play as either alignment, and it's common enough that I expect people to do it. It doesn't seem like that's what implo was doing, though, after they explained it. It's more of a me thing than a town thing.In post 114, sheepsaysmeep wrote:why would town feel an urge to complain about those townreads? I spent a while trying to empathize with it but couldnt reallyIn post 112, Andante wrote: Also, I don't understand like 1 word from whatever you're trying to say here
In post 108, sheepsaysmeep wrote:this stuff felt slightly wolf to me at surface level.In post 52, Alianna wrote: I'm not willing to townlean anyone on the basis of "has reads" but I guess I won't complain about it too much.
"I won't complain about it too much" just feels like a wolf perspective in a way that I could see alianna slipping up. either about some correct townreads or wanting to get townread herself for an active start
the idea of town complaining about some page 2 reads just doesnt make sense to me, even if u disagree with the reads. what I would expect town to do is like, evaluate implosion's alignment based on that, which doesn't happen; this post also assumes implosion town in a +0.05% wolf way
idk ive been back and forth on this
What for?In post 186, Andante wrote: Doctor Drew might be scum
Uhhhh, well, I didn't do it by accident.In post 190, Menalque wrote:lmao please tell me this doesn’t mean you accidentally self-hammered alianna??In post 181, Alianna wrote:I'm not sure if you're implying anything with this post, but no, I am not intending to make a certain mistake twice.In post 86, Andante wrote: like mena, did you just toss alianna on e-1? and not say anything to speed hammer this? cause all I see are lots of votes there already...
What irks you about it? I'm not quite understanding what your thought process is here and I don't want to assume.In post 195, Invisibility wrote:this post also irks me. Why would you ever do thatIn post 173, Alianna wrote: That is, unless I drag myself into an endless pit of WIFOM over the SK claim.
Sorry, got distracted by something IRL. I just forgot to take off my RVS.In post 204, Invisibility wrote: fair I gues. Why are you still voting Doctor Drew?
It was a jokey comment, but I probably could get into a WIFOM spiral over that.In post 207, Doctor Drew wrote:I agree, some pressure on me would help me get into things.In post 205, Andante wrote: doctor drew is a good vote tbh
And I have things to catch up on, but wasn't Alianna being jokey with the SK thing or am I misremembering?
In post 209, Alianna wrote: Current reads: Andante is towny because reasons, Aisa and Invisibility are towny because vibes, Doc and CSF are ever so slightly north of null (Doc because I kind of want to trust Aisa's meta read and CSF because 151 is a good post), andskitter might be sus but I need to re-read her ISO.
The difference is that Aisa has played with you as both alignments. In all my completed games with you, you've been town. I'm sure I could go find similarities/differences (not that I feel like scrolling through a bunch of games to remind myself), but I'd have no way of telling which ones are actually AI. I don't think I could meta read you with any degree of confidence.In post 226, Doctor Drew wrote:One question though Alianna, shouldn't you have a meta read on me by now and not have to trust another player?In post 225, Alianna wrote:In post 209, Alianna wrote: Current reads: Andante is towny because reasons, Aisa and Invisibility are towny because vibes, Doc and CSF are ever so slightly north of null (Doc because I kind of want to trust Aisa's meta read and CSF because 151 is a good post), andskitter might be sus but I need to re-read her ISO.Meh, skitter can go back in the nullbin.
I'm 99% sure the orange I used isn't the one you used, but if you think it's too close I won't use it.
If you think I should have a meta read on you, do you have a meta read on me?In post 226, Doctor Drew wrote:One question though Alianna, shouldn't you have a meta read on me by now and not have to trust another player?In post 225, Alianna wrote:In post 209, Alianna wrote: Current reads: Andante is towny because reasons, Aisa and Invisibility are towny because vibes, Doc and CSF are ever so slightly north of null (Doc because I kind of want to trust Aisa's meta read and CSF because 151 is a good post), andskitter might be sus but I need to re-read her ISO.Meh, skitter can go back in the nullbin.
In post 247, GuerillaWoo wrote: I am not sure I understand why I am being wagoned, but hello o/ Lookin like wagons are forming and dissipating in the span of a handful of posts
Andante's assertion that Invis is tunneled on her and that she's obv town is still fairly inexplicable to me too.Why is she town "Because reasons"?
UNVOTE: literally no one is coming off scummy or townie at this point lol
Doc, can you answer my question?In post 239, Alianna wrote:If you think I should have a meta read on you, do you have a meta read on me?In post 226, Doctor Drew wrote:One question though Alianna, shouldn't you have a meta read on me by now and not have to trust another player?In post 225, Alianna wrote:In post 209, Alianna wrote: Current reads: Andante is towny because reasons, Aisa and Invisibility are towny because vibes, Doc and CSF are ever so slightly north of null (Doc because I kind of want to trust Aisa's meta read and CSF because 151 is a good post), andskitter might be sus but I need to re-read her ISO.Meh, skitter can go back in the nullbin.
Uhhhh...it's a town vibe? A solvey, detectivey vibe?In post 279, Aisa wrote:Can you tell me about Invis's vibes?In post 209, Alianna wrote: Current reads: Andante is towny because reasons, Aisa and Invisibility are towny because vibes, Doc and CSF are ever so slightly north of null (Doc because I kind of want to trust Aisa's meta read and CSF because 151 is a good post), and skitter might be sus but I need to re-read her ISO.
I read that as a statement about me in general rather than me as either alignment. It is accurate though.In post 295, Doctor Drew wrote:Oh here it was, before you asked haha.In post 214, Doctor Drew wrote: I want to hear more from Aisa, she basically nailed my town game, and I feel I have somewhat of a good inclination of both sides of her game.
Alianna always has a back for getting in her own head as well.
Pre Edit:forgot woo was even in the game.
Also, knack not back.
In post 299, Doctor Drew wrote: Dammit, I was so obv vig that game as well.....still bitter about it.
In post 254, GuerillaWoo wrote: The wagon on Andante's pretty good, but Drew has said he wants to catch up so I don't know why he's being wagoned either.
If you think Andante is a good wagon, why did you never vote her?In post 256, GuerillaWoo wrote: I'll keep that in mind, ty
Came in with some brazen stuff and immediately self-declared obv town. The assumption ig is that scum wouldn't engage in any bravado or start questioning TRs on themselves? But that assumption is worth more when it's not Andante just saying "So what I did just now makes me locktown". It comes off as awareness of reads on yourself, and like, feigning confidence in RVS is just super easy to do. She did this after saying Implo is tryharding early.In post 255, Aisa wrote: Why is the wagon on Andante good?
It's a solid place for a wagon.
I need to reread the thread and try to figure out if I have any town reads based on anything said that early. I think Invis and skitter saw the logic innotseeing the logic in Andante's posts, but I'm not sure if there were any more, and I don't have a better yardstick for townie behavior thus far.
The wagons are wagons.In post 301, Alianna wrote: I still haven't read up on the wagons, let me do that.
That last line is exactly how I feel about your posting.In post 246, implosion wrote:Weirdly this is the first post that Alianna has made that maybe makes me think she's town :XIn post 237, Alianna wrote: Also, I forgot that Dunnstral was a player in this game.
Not really something I think scum would be inclined to say with Dunn either as town or as scum.
Most of her posting recently makes me go "yeah, this is well and good but well scum definitely can make this post"
Yours is meh because I TR you (in general, not because of the vote) and I get where you're coming from, but I also don't think you're voting scum. So it kind of averages out.In post 307, Invisibility wrote:what are these reasons?In post 305, Alianna wrote: The votes there are all meh for different reasons.
Mostly because it's out of nowhere.In post 310, sheepsaysmeep wrote: can u briefly talk abt drew too lol
do u townread him or does it just seem meh cuz out of nowhere
Well, considering that you just didn't exist for the first 48 hours, I thought maybe you hadn't confirmed. My bad for assuming though.In post 319, Dunnstral wrote:Generally when a player is gone for 48 hours the mod will send them a prod. After an additional 24 hours the mod will begin to look for a replacement.
So no, I don't think we will need a replacement in this scenario.
In post 320, Dunnstral wrote:
Yeah your reads are sorted by post count. I don't really by that as being a genuine thought process, but rather a byproduct of playing to the crowd.I also don't like that you list your scum leans as "null" as I also think that is a scum move to avoid making enemies by only pushing 1 or 2 people at a time.
VOTE: Alianna
Could be. I'll consider that.In post 324, Dunnstral wrote:If you're town your problem is that you will townread everyone for light banter and giving the bare minimum of content. You are not being skeptical enough.In post 316, Alianna wrote: So we have a problem. One person is sus and there's 2-4 bad guys in the game.
Do you think scum!Andante would fake that in a world where I'm town?In post 423, skitter30 wrote:How worried andante got at alianna maybe being at e1. Makes sense to me if worried abt her partner getting flippedIn post 421, Aisa wrote:And also why you thought this could be a teamIn post 165, skitter30 wrote: i can kinda see andante/alianna scum together
viewtopic.php?t=90462In post 489, sheepsaysmeep wrote:I am curious if u can link this game pls. tho I prob wont read super in depthIn post 438, Alianna wrote: I'm also noticing a slight tone difference from when I was scum with her, but I can't really put it into words yet. I know that's not exactly helpful, just going to note it anyway.