Worst role ideas?

[xtopherusD]

You are a

Framing Suicidal

.

You have a one-shot

Suicide

action, which can be used at any time. Your death will be posted publicly in thread, and you will flip as Vanilla Town.

You win if you use your action, and in doing so you have the Town convinced that

Player X

was the murderer. They must not be the leading wagon at the time of your suicide, but in order for you to win they are to be the next player to be lynched.

[xtopherusD]

You are an

Accident Waiting to Happen

.

If you are not lynched by the end of Day Two, you will do something incredibly stupid and end up killing yourself along with two thirds of the Town.
If you are killed Night One, you will flip as an Nightkill Immune Jester before being revived to play in Day Two.

You win with the Town.

You are an

Accident that Already Happened

.

When you confirm your role in thread, you do something incredibly stupid and end up killing yourself along with two thirds of the Town.

You win with the Town.

You are an

Accident that Keeps on Happening

.

Every time you post in thread, you do something incredibly stupid and end up killing two random Town-aligned players. If your post is more than 140 characters long, you will kill four Town-aligned players.

You win with the Town.

[xtopherusD]

And your thinking of something made me think of something! Aren't ideas fun?


You are a

Terrible Tweeter

.

Your posts must be no longer than 140 characters long, and you may not double post.
You must also speak in "trrbly & ovrly abrv8d txt spk", even if you are nowhere near the character limit.

You win only if people get over this stupid thing called

Facebook

.


(inspired, of course, by the mouse-over text of xkcd #1083.
And by extension the original poster of that idea.)

[xtopherusD]

Basically: You can't win. If you survive to a point where anyone else would win, everyone in the game loses along with you.

[xtopherusD]

ITT worst roles have to be good roles

[xtopherusD]

It's like, it brings a whole new meaning to "

Worst

role ideas" . . .

EDIT: Not @Who

[xtopherusD]

I assumed you saw everything like this anyway:

--- --- -

-----n

-n-- - --- --- --n ---- -n -----n-. --- --n --n- ---- ------ --- -- -- --- ---, --- ---- -nn--n-- -n --- -----

--- --- --- ------ -- - -----n

.
--- --n -- ----- ----n- ------- --- ------.

[xtopherusD]

Well, I did mean the other user with a name about Ns. That is, uh, N. Strange coincidence, I guess.