I might've semi-consciously noted that he hadn't really been mentioned in conversation, but it wasn't at the forefront of my awareness that no votes were on him.
Do you think it's relevant that he didn't have any votes on him? Do you think it's relevant that I think it's relevant that he didn't have any votes on him?
Scumchat is awesome. Yarr!
~"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind."~
1. Not especially. It's not indicative of anything specifically, alignment or whatnot.
2. Depends how relevant you think it is. You seem to think it's mildly relevant at best (? - as far as I can discern) and I suppose there is a degree of anomaly there. This early in the game poking at any anomaly isn't relevant even if the anomaly is intrinsically meaningless/indicative of nothing.
You misunderstood. I'm not talking about relevant in the sense that it tells us something about his alignment. I think it's relevant in the sense that it should guide our actions.
Scumchat is awesome. Yarr!
~"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind."~
I see that Plum is the first person to vote Chronopie. I also see Leo and Zang being wagoned. However, everything up to the vote is RVS shenanigans to me and I oppose the intermediate "bandwagon stage" (for lack of a better term) between the RVS and actual scumhunting. Therefore, I see no way to connect the dots.