Yes, first to die
VOTE: Gamma
Yes, first to die
I do agree with this after we kill GammaIn post 10, Alianna wrote: VOTE: DragonEater70
This draconian leader must be overthrown! Anarchy must reign!!!
Then don't vote Alianna
I don't believe you, why would I be the reason you joined?In post 16, Gamma Emerald wrote:
you were the reason I joined FuDuzn, so the immediate hostility is disheartening
Lol, I haven't played a game since 2014....so be gentleIn post 18, Gamma Emerald wrote: because I like playing with folks that I haven't played with before, especially if they have older join dates
Why are you so concerned whether your RVS posting makes sense?In post 24, Alianna wrote:I don't remember if I thought you said that, but I probably did misread you. I have not really been paying attention to whether my RVS jokeposting makes any sense.
Ok let's put in some work.In post 67, Gamma Emerald wrote: I want to work together with them and FD rn
Was trying to parse 79 as we speak here, feels a bit manufactured......if that makes senseIn post 82, Claptastik wrote:What do you think of Margot?In post 81, FuDuzn wrote: I feel like Clap is a bit too aggressive too early to be scum here
Let's just ignore the typos, mkay?In post 127, FuDuzn wrote: I hope Alianna comes back soon though, I want to talk to her, not a fan tbh.
Clap I feel is town, Gamma and Hu have me a bit paranoid since they seemed so trusting on me so quickly, but nothing of their posting besides that seems 'that' bad.
I do want to want to give the N00bs some room to breath(hello pot me kettle, I am basically a N00bs here as well), but when I am home on my computer I will give them a more thorough looking over. I don't want to give scum an excuse to play the N00bs card too much.
Upward though gives me town vibes, I don't feel N00bs scum comes in like that.
What do you make of Hu and Gamma seemingly following me blindly?In post 129, Alianna wrote:I just opened this thread, not caught up yet but what did you want to talk about?In post 127, FuDuzn wrote:I hope Alianna comes back soon though, I want to talk to her, not a fan tbh.
Bad choice of words, more you two accepting me as town so quickly.In post 132, Gamma Emerald wrote: that's one way to interpret what we're doing
Wait, who else is in the town block now?In post 136, Gamma Emerald wrote: his questions don't feel like they're meant to corral the game into a certain position rn
plus: townblock of 2 + townblock of 2 = townblock of 4 (this also goes for my hu tao read, I think this is a more succinct way to express my early idea I expressed)
Oh Gyp? I can vibe with that.In post 137, FuDuzn wrote:Wait, who else is in the town block now?In post 136, Gamma Emerald wrote: his questions don't feel like they're meant to corral the game into a certain position rn
plus: townblock of 2 + townblock of 2 = townblock of 4 (this also goes for my hu tao read, I think this is a more succinct way to express my early idea I expressed)
I get where Gyp is coming from, I put it a different way but it does seem like you are trying to be too 'agreeable'.In post 140, Alianna wrote:Not TRing Margot, but I like that you brought up the radar thing because that's something I've noticed myself doing as town (as in, committing the fallacy that Margot is committing) and have been trying to "un-calibrate" myself from, and I've also been wrongly scumread by people who I now realize were calibrated the other way.In post 89, Gypyx wrote:aaaah yes, agressive = scum and nice = townIn post 79, MargotRosa wrote: I'm opening up the old sublime text Mafia notes templates again. What a time to be alive.
Only vibe leans atm are Gypyx as town and Claptastik as Scum, but they are purely on vibes based on early d1 behaviour, and tells are almost always useless, esp. as you two seem to have been playing for ages.
In post 42, Alianna wrote:And why specifically the townplay guides? This looks TMI-ish.In post 38, Gypyx wrote:I'd strongly advise you to check out the guides about townplay that we have on the mafiascum wiki, they're way more insightful than what anyone here could reasonably sayIn post 33, Zebedee wrote: Feck... I'm a baby here....
Please be gentle. So if I think so someone's spouting crap I should say so?
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... y_Articles
Though 39 does suggest you're aware of the info difference between town and scum, so it'd be kind of weird if you did actually TMI-slip and thenthatwas your next post. Hmmmmmmmm, you can be a townlean for now (probably will have to check my logic tomorrow because it's getting pretty late and my brain is fried). I'm still interested in the answer to that question though.
Like, this gives town vibes just because it's the kind of non-committal, but still roughly reasoned out thinking I'd expect, whereas #66, #68 and #70 feel a bit more accusatory? Just feels off for the first 24 hours of the first day.
E: tag fix
clap certainely feels like town motivated agression here, can't tell if Margot has got her radar calibrated on the complete opposite of mine or if she's just scum afraid of a proactive townie
and while this got me thinking about it, i gotta say the Alianna post in question looks pretty bad to me? Like, it's *extremely* reasonable, and non-antagonizing immediatly afterwards, almost like the main worry is making sure i don't get angry about it
I wasn't worried about that at all, so I'm having trouble seeing where you're getting that from. I doubled back on the ping I got from 38 because I realized it was most likely wrong. It would probably be easier to respond to this if you elaborated on what in the post gave you that impression.
And I forgot they were even in this game, two whole posts not really adding anything. Hopefully they get this notification and post moreIn post 56, DeltaWave wrote:Hu Tao's post sounds like the kind of thing a townie would say tbfIn post 39, Gypyx wrote:VOTE: Hu TaoIn post 23, Hu Tao wrote:Thank you. I will blindly trust this and say you're town too!In post 14, FuDuzn wrote:I like your entrance the best.In post 11, Hu Tao wrote: Hi.
You are town.
kinda wanna say this comes from scum? Like, there's a bit of a "oh god i gotta appear towny" in those words imho
"blindly" also sounds hyperaware of the lack of info a townie would normally have
I appreciate the humor right out of the gate, and somewhat of a They Live reference.....love that movie, town points.In post 36, Laplacian wrote: Let's goooo. I'm here to get killed day 1 again and chew bubblegum.
And I'm all out of gum
In post 116, Laplacian wrote:I'm down with this vote (despite only having 2 posts myself)In post 114, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: MargotRosaIn post 112, Gypyx wrote: VOTE: MargotRosa
Anyways wanna vote a slot that's been weirdly shy about things?
I somewhat agree with this idea. I think she’s just been not present but wouldn’t mind leaving her a little present on her return
VOTE: MargotRosa
But all those town points go away for this opportunistic vote on Margot here, especially since right after that they don't mention Margot in their reads(I thought maybe it was a joke vote, but Gyp's vote seemed serious to me). So some scum pings I am getting from Lap.In post 119, Laplacian wrote: Not many reads yet. HT and Aliana feel towny. Upwards has the tryhard poat that feels nai from a newbie. Deltawave having no comment on my vote also feels a little scummy.
In post 71, lucca261 wrote: fuck, missed on RVS
I'll just pretend nothing of note happened and VOTE: Upwards
In post 76, lucca261 wrote:pretending it's still RVS is more fun though and even the mod's using an avatar that takes me back to 2017 (I think) shitpostingIn post 74, Gypyx wrote:How about you don't pretend it's still RVS and come play the game with us my friendIn post 71, lucca261 wrote: fuck, missed on RVS
I'll just pretend nothing of note happened and VOTE: Upwards
Whole lotta null here, if anything would like to hear why I am 'towny enough'In post 78, lucca261 wrote: to be fair, I read the game again and jumped at nothing
at most I think FD looks towny enough
While I definitely agree about Clap, why Hu as well?In post 99, Naerys wrote: initial gut feelings : claptastik and Hu town
In post 35, Zebedee wrote:In post 32, MargotRosa wrote:So you admit that it's either a bad fact, or a bad fake fact.........In post 26, Alianna wrote:It's not a bad fact if it's true!In post 22, MargotRosa wrote:Creating fake dragon facts are encouraged. Deciding the leader of the dragons is a cannibal is a bad fact.In post 10, Alianna wrote: VOTE: DragonEater70
This draconian leader must be overthrown! Anarchy must reign!!!
VOTE: Alianna
I mean what is this about? From either angle it seems like a "let's attack here as I have nothing better to do" sort of thing ?
Cuz I can't see Anything other than that
These two posts from Zeb just scream town to me, feels like their reactions here are so genuine and pure. We may have an apprentice to our townblocc.In post 86, Zebedee wrote:In post 42, Alianna wrote:And why specifically the townplay guides? This looks TMI-ish.In post 38, Gypyx wrote:I'd strongly advise you to check out the guides about townplay that we have on the mafiascum wiki, they're way more insightful than what anyone here could reasonably sayIn post 33, Zebedee wrote: Feck... I'm a baby here....
Please be gentle. So if I think so someone's spouting crap I should say so?
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... y_Articles
Though 39 does suggest you're aware of the info difference between town and scum, so it'd be kind of weird if you did actually TMI-slip and thenthatwas your next post. Hmmmmmmmm, you can be a townlean for now (probably will have to check my logic tomorrow because it's getting pretty late and my brain is fried). I'm still interested in the answer to that question though.
Yeah I read the post and thought, how does they know I'm town? I thought it was only a thing scums would know...
I took a decade off and still almost have as many posts as you, so maybe you are just a n00b as well(jk, again.....I am learning how to walk again as well lol)In post 148, Alianna wrote:suppose I should probably link the gameIn post 147, Alianna wrote:Hu's read on you kind of reminds me of their townread on KittyTacky in the last game we played, in that the strength of the townread seems disproportionate to the strength of the reasons they've given for it. They definitely did it to a greater extent in the other game, but I'm still going to call it +town.In post 131, FuDuzn wrote:What do you make of Hu and Gamma seemingly following me blindly?In post 129, Alianna wrote:I just opened this thread, not caught up yet but what did you want to talk about?In post 127, FuDuzn wrote:I hope Alianna comes back soon though, I want to talk to her, not a fan tbh.
I should probably check if they also do that as scum, but I don't feel like metadiving right now.
I can see Gamma's explanation in 136.
I definitely would not consider myself a veteran XD.In post 131, FuDuzn wrote:I also get a vibe from your posts that you are trying to seem genuine, yet somehow seem fake.
I just want more from you to get a better feel for you(again, focusing on those who seem more like veterans of this site lol).
It is weird feeling like the elder statesman here though.
I kinda of read it as as nothing about the game jumped out to them, except that I am town for 'reasons'.In post 155, DeltaWave wrote:I'm still not caught up yet and I'm fairly burnt out from work today but if I'm reading that last post by lucca correctly I don't think it's null. I don't really like going from "here's my RVS vote!" to "ohhh to be fair I was too hasty now that I read the game." It's an RVS vote, it doesn't have to make sense. Why backpedal on it so quickly.In post 145, FuDuzn wrote:In post 71, lucca261 wrote: fuck, missed on RVS
I'll just pretend nothing of note happened and VOTE: UpwardsIn post 76, lucca261 wrote:pretending it's still RVS is more fun though and even the mod's using an avatar that takes me back to 2017 (I think) shitpostingIn post 74, Gypyx wrote:How about you don't pretend it's still RVS and come play the game with us my friendIn post 71, lucca261 wrote: fuck, missed on RVS
I'll just pretend nothing of note happened and VOTE: UpwardsWhole lotta null here, if anything would like to hear why I am 'towny enough'In post 78, lucca261 wrote: to be fair, I read the game again and jumped at nothing
at most I think FD looks towny enough
Weird in what way?In post 157, Alianna wrote:I've received quite a few accusations like that, but only when I'm town (iirc anyway).In post 142, FuDuzn wrote:I get where Gyp is coming from, I put it a different way but it does seem like you are trying to be too 'agreeable'.In post 140, Alianna wrote:Not TRing Margot, but I like that you brought up the radar thing because that's something I've noticed myself doing as town (as in, committing the fallacy that Margot is committing) and have been trying to "un-calibrate" myself from, and I've also been wrongly scumread by people who I now realize were calibrated the other way.In post 89, Gypyx wrote:aaaah yes, agressive = scum and nice = townIn post 79, MargotRosa wrote: I'm opening up the old sublime text Mafia notes templates again. What a time to be alive.
Only vibe leans atm are Gypyx as town and Claptastik as Scum, but they are purely on vibes based on early d1 behaviour, and tells are almost always useless, esp. as you two seem to have been playing for ages.
In post 42, Alianna wrote:And why specifically the townplay guides? This looks TMI-ish.In post 38, Gypyx wrote:I'd strongly advise you to check out the guides about townplay that we have on the mafiascum wiki, they're way more insightful than what anyone here could reasonably sayIn post 33, Zebedee wrote: Feck... I'm a baby here....
Please be gentle. So if I think so someone's spouting crap I should say so?
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... y_Articles
Though 39 does suggest you're aware of the info difference between town and scum, so it'd be kind of weird if you did actually TMI-slip and thenthatwas your next post. Hmmmmmmmm, you can be a townlean for now (probably will have to check my logic tomorrow because it's getting pretty late and my brain is fried). I'm still interested in the answer to that question though.
Like, this gives town vibes just because it's the kind of non-committal, but still roughly reasoned out thinking I'd expect, whereas #66, #68 and #70 feel a bit more accusatory? Just feels off for the first 24 hours of the first day.
E: tag fix
clap certainely feels like town motivated agression here, can't tell if Margot has got her radar calibrated on the complete opposite of mine or if she's just scum afraid of a proactive townie
and while this got me thinking about it, i gotta say the Alianna post in question looks pretty bad to me? Like, it's *extremely* reasonable, and non-antagonizing immediatly afterwards, almost like the main worry is making sure i don't get angry about it
I wasn't worried about that at all, so I'm having trouble seeing where you're getting that from. I doubled back on the ping I got from 38 because I realized it was most likely wrong. It would probably be easier to respond to this if you elaborated on what in the post gave you that impression.
Kind of the opposite how I town read Clap because I don't think they would be too aggressive, like scum would be more careful early game......I feel like you are so worried about the optics of what you are doing more than the content itself.
I get weird vibes off this but idk if there's anything to it.
So if I am picking up what you are putting down, you think Lucca is scum?In post 158, DeltaWave wrote: It sounds to me like lucca got some backlash from gypyx for what was legitimately an odd post #71 and then immediately backpedaled it. If it's really an RVS vote then who cares. That's what the R means. Then lucca pegged you as town in #78. You get more friends by calling people town, especially early on. If you put this sequence of events together, the problem is evident.
Uhh, what is going on with Clap's vote hahaIn post 163, DragonEater70 wrote:Votecount 1.03
Day 1 will end in (expired on 2024-01-14 01:13:22).
Gyp still does seem so towny, not loving this take from Clap thoughIn post 220, Claptastik wrote:They are allowed. And other people are allowed to question such switches.In post 218, Gypyx wrote: Hot take but people should be allowed to switch up their playstyle
Maybe she's making that conscious effortit especially gets less worth as a meta read here cause Gamma is making a conscious effort to switch up how she plays rather than failing to reproduce her town metabecauseshe has difficulty reproducing her town meta as scum.
My first reaction to this was a buddy talking to a buddy, kind of a tinfoily take but I wanted it out there to see if someone else agrees, of I am just seeing something that isn't there.In post 222, lucca261 wrote:The thing is: if you are town here, it's very likely that scum will try to use your status as a new player to advance their game. Not in a "I'm evil, kill all the newbies" way, but maybe by buddying you, maybe by trying to use you as elimbait, stuff like this.In post 193, Upwards wrote:Why exactly should I be paranoid, and of what? Don’t really get your point here.In post 176, lucca261 wrote: I'm on that weird path where I kinda think my only scumread so far is Upwards for .
Not to play armchair psychologist, but I think a guy who read a 100-person game on this website (and probably read several wallposts on the way) would feel a little more paranoid on his first post.
Too non-commital, too agreeable. This paragraph in particular:I mean, this looks a lot like newbscum to me.So I guess I will just start talking about things I find notable reading the previous conversations. Please let me know if you think anything about the points I am making or if I am mistaken in some way.
Being so open on your opening post, even asking people to correct you? I see newb!town would be a little more wary, especially on a game like this with several very experienced players.
Keep in mind this is a early D1 read, so it's not final or decisive in any way. But it's something that pinged me early game.
You are correct, it wasn't anything really well thought out, I was just quickly going through the iso's of people I haven't really had an opinion on yet. Wasn't meant to be a set in stone super solid list of reads or anything.In post 230, MargotRosa wrote: At the bottom of page 6. Will post vibes from here and keep going after a bit of a break.
Town leans:
- GammaEmerald - Liked their vote for me the most out of all of them. Feels like the work of a fairly proactive townie to gain info for reads based on responses, which I vibe with
- Laplacian - Based mostly on 119. I didn't like Hu Tao's vote for Upward at 101, for fairly similar reasons expressed there.
- Gypyx can stay for now as well.
Very slight scum lean from FuDuzn. 127 seems like their reads are grasps that don't have much weight behind them. This is only more so by the "genuine but fake" read on Gamma in 131. No post refs, just vibes. There's also alot of filler, like in 143, first half of 144, and the second half of 144, 145 and 146 feel like boosting post count more than anything well thought out or solid.
Back in halfa.
I don't like talking buddies until a scum is flipped per se, but as you put it an interesting possible interaction in the case one of them does flip scum.In post 239, Gypyx wrote:Yeah i can totally see it, although i also agree this feels quite tinfoil-ish, think we keep this in mind for if we manage to flip one of them as scum?In post 237, FuDuzn wrote:My first reaction to this was a buddy talking to a buddy, kind of a tinfoily take but I wanted it out there to see if someone else agrees, of I am just seeing something that isn't there.In post 222, lucca261 wrote:The thing is: if you are town here, it's very likely that scum will try to use your status as a new player to advance their game. Not in a "I'm evil, kill all the newbies" way, but maybe by buddying you, maybe by trying to use you as elimbait, stuff like this.In post 193, Upwards wrote:Why exactly should I be paranoid, and of what? Don’t really get your point here.In post 176, lucca261 wrote: I'm on that weird path where I kinda think my only scumread so far is Upwards for .
Not to play armchair psychologist, but I think a guy who read a 100-person game on this website (and probably read several wallposts on the way) would feel a little more paranoid on his first post.
Too non-commital, too agreeable. This paragraph in particular:I mean, this looks a lot like newbscum to me.So I guess I will just start talking about things I find notable reading the previous conversations. Please let me know if you think anything about the points I am making or if I am mistaken in some way.
Being so open on your opening post, even asking people to correct you? I see newb!town would be a little more wary, especially on a game like this with several very experienced players.
Keep in mind this is a early D1 read, so it's not final or decisive in any way. But it's something that pinged me early game.
Lol, don't be lying to me nowIn post 243, Upwards wrote:Actually I can see it funnily enough, especially with that last paragraph being potentially usable as a setup to justify changing course in the future. Thing is, town might just as well make this post and I have it on good sources that I am not the buddy of anyone.In post 237, FuDuzn wrote:
My first reaction to this was a buddy talking to a buddy, kind of a tinfoily take but I wanted it out there to see if someone else agrees, of I am just seeing something that isn't there.In post 222, lucca261 wrote:The thing is: if you are town here, it's very likely that scum will try to use your status as a new player to advance their game. Not in a "I'm evil, kill all the newbies" way, but maybe by buddying you, maybe by trying to use you as elimbait, stuff like this.In post 193, Upwards wrote:Why exactly should I be paranoid, and of what? Don’t really get your point here.In post 176, lucca261 wrote: I'm on that weird path where I kinda think my only scumread so far is Upwards for .
Not to play armchair psychologist, but I think a guy who read a 100-person game on this website (and probably read several wallposts on the way) would feel a little more paranoid on his first post.
Too non-commital, too agreeable. This paragraph in particular:I mean, this looks a lot like newbscum to me.So I guess I will just start talking about things I find notable reading the previous conversations. Please let me know if you think anything about the points I am making or if I am mistaken in some way.
Being so open on your opening post, even asking people to correct you? I see newb!town would be a little more wary, especially on a game like this with several very experienced players.
Keep in mind this is a early D1 read, so it's not final or decisive in any way. But it's something that pinged me early game.
I wanted reactions to it, especially after Delta basically said you were scummy, but couldn't actually say the words, which seemed weird to me.In post 246, lucca261 wrote: Just re-read some stuff and feel confident adding Margot to my town pile so far.
Her stuff seems natural. I like the contrarian reads. Feel like scum!Margot would have more defined reads by now. feels pretty good, even if I do not agree with most of it.
Still not loving Laplacian.
So FD, since you are active, why are you voting me again?
I have noticed people go nuts for page tops nowadays lolIn post 250, Gamma Emerald wrote: bloop
Also, why would you feel like scumMargot would have more defined reads?In post 246, lucca261 wrote: Just re-read some stuff and feel confident adding Margot to my town pile so far.
Her stuff seems natural. I like the contrarian reads. Feel like scum!Margot would have more defined reads by now. feels pretty good, even if I do not agree with most of it.
Still not loving Laplacian.
So FD, since you are active, why are you voting me again?
In a world where you are town, you do realize town will vote town quite a bit, right?In post 256, lucca261 wrote:Sure. You're sending mixed signals to me, right on the middle of null. There's a good possibility you're town, yet you're voting meIn post 251, FuDuzn wrote:I wanted reactions to it, especially after Delta basically said you were scummy, but couldn't actually say the words, which seemed weird to me.In post 246, lucca261 wrote: Just re-read some stuff and feel confident adding Margot to my town pile so far.
Her stuff seems natural. I like the contrarian reads. Feel like scum!Margot would have more defined reads by now. feels pretty good, even if I do not agree with most of it.
Still not loving Laplacian.
So FD, since you are active, why are you voting me again?
Are you concerned with my vote on you?
if you're town and voting me I'm doing something wrong
if you're scum and voting me I could use the reasoning for posterity
Always concerning
But if she is decisive as either alignment, and you feel she isn't decisive here, wouldn't that be NAI?In post 258, lucca261 wrote:Quick meta read shows me Margot is a very decisive player both as town and scum. Firm reads, firm stances.In post 254, FuDuzn wrote:Also, why would you feel like scumMargot would have more defined reads?In post 246, lucca261 wrote: Just re-read some stuff and feel confident adding Margot to my town pile so far.
Her stuff seems natural. I like the contrarian reads. Feel like scum!Margot would have more defined reads by now. feels pretty good, even if I do not agree with most of it.
Still not loving Laplacian.
So FD, since you are active, why are you voting me again?
The amount of townreads and lack of serious scumreads so far shows me that she's struggling to form solid reads (as I am on several slots). Makes me think she's town.
Spoiler:
Wut?In post 270, MargotRosa wrote: I'm beginning to feel a little more confident in my scum lean on FD.
Spoiler:
This post was a red flag. The first and third comments feel like, and second comment explicitly is, fishing to see if someone is willing to join in on a vote, which feels scummy to me. Also breaks from the usual train up to that point of single quotes and multiple topic divided posts, which given that it's a reaction to my scum lean, indicates some jumpiness at suspicion.
That latter point was supported more by the fact that most posts by FD since are in direct response to questioning, save two:
- 252, which is either unrelated levity, or a conscious attempt to inject a positive tone into posting.
- 244, which is what prompted lucca to ask FD why they made the comment, and started the train of defences:
251, 254 which looks more like an attempted deflection than anything else, 257, 262, and immediately after another deflection with 263.
251 and 263 play into the impression that I'm getting of a scum looking to test wagons people might be willing to jump onto.
My vote isn't parked anywhere, so I'm going to put it here for now.
VOTE: FuDuzn
The thing is, it is super easy for scum to seem superficially towny for calling out the town blocc thing(in a world where Gamma is town)In post 273, Upwards wrote: Okay here we go.
I find Gamma suspicious for the townblock on day 1 when that’s a time where there’s really little basis for such a thing.
On the flipside I like Claptastic, Deltawave and Laplacian for calling it out.
I’m really mixed on Gypyx. She’s very active which is probably a good sign, but then again I don’t like my exchange with her. In #92 she feels the need to state that I shouldn’t blindly trust her, which is obvious enough that it irritated even me as a beginner. What follows is this strange discussion only to end it somewhat condescendingly in #206. Not a fan.
Ooh look at me all page top(cue Margot finding this scummy for.....reasons??)In post 275, FuDuzn wrote:The thing is, it is super easy for scum to seem superficially towny for calling out the town blocc thing(in a world where Gamma is town)In post 273, Upwards wrote: Okay here we go.
I find Gamma suspicious for the townblock on day 1 when that’s a time where there’s really little basis for such a thing.
On the flipside I like Claptastic, Deltawave and Laplacian for calling it out.
I’m really mixed on Gypyx. She’s very active which is probably a good sign, but then again I don’t like my exchange with her. In #92 she feels the need to state that I shouldn’t blindly trust her, which is obvious enough that it irritated even me as a beginner. What follows is this strange discussion only to end it somewhat condescendingly in #206. Not a fan.
Personally I am going back and forth on Gamma and Clap, thought Clap was clearly town early on but lately I almost feel like they are being exposed
Can you elaborate exactly how any of the posts I made that you linked to are scummy and not, ya know, how I play the game?In post 278, MargotRosa wrote: It's a lean with reasoning backing up my reads, yeah.
I already said I had a slight scum read, and when I came back, your posts fit into a playstyle I see as scum-leaning, which solidified it.
You have used the possible worst faith interpretations, as you put it, and used it to push me as scum......without considering any other interpretation of my posts.In post 287, MargotRosa wrote:I didn't find everything you did scummy. I just gave some possible worst faith interpretations of what you said, which is often how I play the game, so I can reason through which of those worst faith interpretations are actually worth taking seriously.In post 281, FuDuzn wrote:Can you elaborate exactly how any of the posts I made that you linked to are scummy and not, ya know, how I play the game?In post 278, MargotRosa wrote: It's a lean with reasoning backing up my reads, yeah.
I already said I had a slight scum read, and when I came back, your posts fit into a playstyle I see as scum-leaning, which solidified it.
Like seriously saying me making a joke about the page top is scummy???
Like I said, I feel like you are being wildly disingenuous here. There is no world where you find everything I do as actually scummy.
I'm going to gestate, and do some further research. I'm also in the process of forming my full read list, which is difficult as many people haven't posted all that much, but should it have posted in the next couple days. Going to gf's dad's birthday in a few hours and then catching up on needed sleep, so may be a bit inactive in the interim
No, I am trying to figure out if you are town since I have my doubts now. I like other people opinions since I don't want to hang on to a stale read. And getting people to openly talk about reads holds people accountable for what they said and will expose those who are being disingenuous.In post 290, Claptastik wrote:In post 285, FuDuzn wrote: Pre edit: I am trying to gauge other's opinions on you(like asking Lucca earlier), like I said I had you as solidly town earlier but am doubting that read now.It seems like you're admitting to Margot's charge that you're fishing for support for a wagon rather than just pushing, but acting like that's a townie thing to do. It isn't, particularly on D1.In post 286, FuDuzn wrote: ^^The pre Edit was directed at Clap, if not clear
UNVOTE:
What games of hers in particular led you to believe this?In post 293, Claptastik wrote:Yeah I looked at her earlier today and found the same thing.In post 258, lucca261 wrote: Quick meta read shows me Margot is a very decisive player both as town and scum. Firm reads, firm stances.
You realize that you just said that her town game in 2080 is much different than here?In post 300, Claptastik wrote:Newbie 2080 she was town. Check out 284 and 285 - reasoned and ordered reads list, much different from her play here.In post 295, FuDuzn wrote:What games of hers in particular led you to believe this?In post 293, Claptastik wrote:Yeah I looked at her earlier today and found the same thing.In post 258, lucca261 wrote: Quick meta read shows me Margot is a very decisive player both as town and scum. Firm reads, firm stances.
Mini Normal 2239 she was scum. See post 199 - looks like 284 in the town game.
I literally just said the same thing in regards to Upwards post.In post 301, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is surface level analysisIn post 273, Upwards wrote: Okay here we go.
I find Gamma suspicious for the townblock on day 1 when that’s a time where there’s really little basis for such a thing.
On the flipside I like Claptastic, Deltawave and Laplacian for calling it out.
I’m really mixed on Gypyx. She’s very active which is probably a good sign, but then again I don’t like my exchange with her. In #92 she feels the need to state that I shouldn’t blindly trust her, which is obvious enough that it irritated even me as a beginner. What follows is this strange discussion only to end it somewhat condescendingly in #206. Not a fan.
Regardless of my alignment I think calling my townblock out is an easy thing to do as scum. This seems less like a real thought process and more like reflexively giving townpoints to player who’ve criticized me.
I actually lean that this is TvTIn post 304, Claptastik wrote:Do you mean you're going back and forth on each of us individually, or are you saying you're fairly certain we're TvS, and going back and forth on which is T and which is S?In post 275, FuDuzn wrote: Personally I am going back and forth on Gamma and Clap, thought Clap was clearly town early on but lately I almost feel like they are being exposed
Yet she had the time to pick apart my posts in a pretty decisive manner.In post 305, Claptastik wrote:Yes.In post 302, FuDuzn wrote:You realize that you just said that her town game in 2080 is much different than here?In post 300, Claptastik wrote:Newbie 2080 she was town. Check out 284 and 285 - reasoned and ordered reads list, much different from her play here.In post 295, FuDuzn wrote:What games of hers in particular led you to believe this?In post 293, Claptastik wrote:Yeah I looked at her earlier today and found the same thing.In post 258, lucca261 wrote: Quick meta read shows me Margot is a very decisive player both as town and scum. Firm reads, firm stances.
Mini Normal 2239 she was scum. See post 199 - looks like 284 in the town game.
You realize I'm also saying her scum game is much different than here? Both are more active and decisive.
So, it stands to reason that she hasn't had time to fully engage with this game yet, right?
Yes exactly, and then switched back to Margot after her most recent posts.
It does seem that organically everyone is coming to Gyp as town, or at least a good chunk of us.
Quite the opposite if you read most of the back and forth between us yesterday.In post 388, Claptastik wrote:As you've been asking his opinion on things I thought you've liked Lucca for town for some time now.In post 376, FuDuzn wrote: I am actually really liking Lucca for town after ^this post.
I am disliking many of Clap's takes as of late, but what do you think the motivation is behind them?In post 392, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you think I’m just trying to scrap? If so you’re sorely mistaken.In post 380, Claptastik wrote:In post 368, Claptastik wrote: Gamma likes the 1v1 with the newbie.I think town tends to just shrug off a push from a newbie. Scum tend to like getting into it with a newbie that's pushing them, as they may come out looking better from it.In post 369, Gamma Emerald wrote:?
Oh, how so?In post 395, Gamma Emerald wrote: I’m questioning that myself too; feel like he should be doing something more here regarding me given a game just wrapped that we were both in
Why would the other game affect what how he interacts with you?In post 397, Gamma Emerald wrote: Wdym how so?