I have a question:In post 365, Davsto wrote:In post 364, Varsoon wrote:In post 362, Deductive wrote:I self-nominate myself for simultaneously both 'Rising Star' & 'Best Mafia Catcher' for my first ever forum mafia game where I was 2/2 on catching scum.Seconded.
Never before, in the history of Mafia, has there been a player who has gone from not playing to catching scum with such aplomb. If one was to look at Deductive's play in the aforementioned game, they would find that advanced interrogation techniques to rope his foes into ultimate defeat. It's undeniable that Deductive is probably going to be responsible for shifting the site-meta entirely towards town winning a majority of games, as well. Give this man a medal.
How low is the bar when it comes to 'Rising Star'?
I mean, I am always under the sentiment that you have to play a lot of games to get nominated (Take myself for example: I think I went 3of3 or 2of2 3 times out of 6 town games and get townread by 2/3 of the town in my first scum game.) I have a lot of names to nominate for 'Rising Star', but eventhough I am pleased with my nomination as I am with mine, I don't consider them to have enough sample (just like I did with me). Because if the bar is THAT low (a sample of one game) I'm going to barrage the nomination form with a lot of names because I do have a lot of names.