In post 301, Scummies wrote:The nominations should be up to date now!
there's an error in the first post - BBmolla was nominated for most cunning manipulator but he's listed under the paragon nominees.
In post 301, Scummies wrote:The nominations should be up to date now!
idk it just says winning impressively not winning impressively against opposition deemed to be adequateby those viewing the game (although setup balance is relevant to how challenging it was to win). every time people bitch about a "best x performance" nom it's always "well the opposing side was shit" like it would be a more worthy nomination if they won LESS impressively - because ppl automatically think if the winning team never encountered any adversity they didn't "earn" the win which is bullshit because getting a flawless win is inherently not an easy thing or it would happen all the timeAwarded to the anti-town team that performed the most impressively in winning their game. Judges may consider how much the anti-town team won by as well as how challenging the task of winning was.