In post 24, SpyreX wrote:I'm totally gonna find the 5 of you and show you a gruesome death.
Do your worst. I'll be waiting
In post 24, SpyreX wrote:I'm totally gonna find the 5 of you and show you a gruesome death.
In post 328, Kublai Khan wrote:It was an extremely close decision and some extra judges had to come in and break up some ties.
In post 331, Kublai Khan wrote:Aw.. The super-secret judging forum is gone for me to go back and check, but I think I was pushing for BTTF town. It was a pretty close battle.
In post 364, Choice wrote:Katsuki is a top tier player, as is Faraday. He and Faraday are nigh unreadable in different ways
In post 367, Choice wrote:Please do not belittle the achievements of other players, MagnaofNoScummies.
In post 382, Untrod Tripod wrote:are we really having discussion about awards that already went out and can't change? really?
In post 377, Faraday wrote:Pedit: Yeah. But ultimately, Cyclic's flaws were to do with the way the mechanic as opposed to a set-up thing. Part of the core mechanic was that passing scum to scum resulted in death (or something like that). Sure, it was definitely innovative but it didn't work as well in practise and while innovation is something that I think should be rewarded I don't think a broken mechanic should win 'best'. Cyclic 2.0 was far better, and fixed most of the problems I think.
In post 390, zoraster wrote:crud. now I feel like I can't use my conspiracy theory I was saving up! thanks a lot.
In post 389, Choice wrote:I can easily prove that Katsuki is an able player, perhaps moreso than Faraday.
In post 404, xRECKONERx wrote:@MoI: I had the same argument as you for cyclical.