[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7936706 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Title Fairy: Killer App Edition (Swipe Right!) - Mafiascum.net
Oh thanks. I have no idea what it's like to have a thankless job where people constantly criticize you based on guessed information.
How about when you get criticized for known information, like that time you said shotty should get hit by a bus? You Def should have been stripped of mod and discussion banned for that, ftr. And that's not the first time you've said something that isn't only out of line for a moderator but completely out of line for any poster of MS.
You're at best the second worst mod and basically are an all around rude dude that should have been stripped of mod years ago. And now that we just got 2 new discussion mods, I really don't see any reason that you're still on the staff.
Last edited by PJ. on Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
Post
Post #1204 (isolation #4) » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:01 am
Postby PJ. »
In post 1200, Kublai Khan wrote:Yeah, I'll admit to being too much of a rude crude dude, but that comment was totally blown out of proportion. In the midst of the repeated "BUSSED SO HARD" rejections, it was meant as a joke that Shotty would need to be hit by a literal bus for the title to stick. I have already apologized privately to Shotty and publicly in thread for the misunderstanding.
I don't think it was blown out of proportion. I think saying "I was misunderstood" is a piss poor way to explain something that was pretty cut and dry. It must be nice to be able to apologize when people get offended by something you say and it gets all made better. Wish the rest of us had that option. Especially after somebody says something that's actually pretty funny.
Post
Post #1206 (isolation #5) » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:48 am
Postby PJ. »
I have no idea what was in the pm, so I can admit to having imperfect information, but the shotty with less depth perception thing was p funny. But hey, maybe you are just seeing his pms in the worst light. Maybe if he had a chance to apologize it would of been dandy. Maybe all bans should be prefaced "ban or a 2 sentence apology"
Also, I've never gotten banned for something I felt needed an apology, but hey if I could of gotten out of my unjust 90 day ban with a like 2 liner, you guys should of informed me of that loophole.
Because the title is stupid as fuck and i only suggested it because i was poking fun at nati, and she knew I was. Also it definitely doesn't follow any of the rules i don't think.
I definitely prefer the pun better than just straight Shipwright. She is not a literal Shipwright. Although she did build the ship of sleepoxhippo and other dirty sleepo slash fiction. But I highly prefer Shipwrite to Shipwright.
Post
Post #2253 (isolation #21) » Sat Nov 05, 2016 4:15 pm
Postby PJ. »
She doesn't build anything. She is not a shipwright. She is not someone who built something on the site. She's known for writing funny slash, pitching the idea of the writing contest(although Kuribo actually is the one who made the thread and he might have came up with the idea independently), and running queue. I don't think Shipwright without the pun even makes sense.
Post
Post #2356 (isolation #31) » Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:31 am
Postby PJ. »
In post 2351, Shaziro wrote:ok but...honeypot traps are a thing. Specifically a thing Ani participated in. And the type of plant the pokemon he got was based on.
except "honey trap" into google directly goes to 3 articles about honey traps and the 4th is about a girl in britain that lured a kid to his death with her looks. So....i'm gonna go with, there is no difference. Sorry bud. Don't get honey trapped.
Last edited by PJ. on Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In post 3554, PJ. wrote:Also anti-nom Queen Shifty, recently banned users probably should get titles. Rewards bad behavior.
This title has nothing to do with being banned though!
Doesn't matter.
Is this because of Shockmaster? Because that wasn't the only reason it was rejected, and it wasn't due to a recent ban, but what was then a current the ban.
This title has nothing to do with a negative behaviour and she is neither currently banned, nor banned often.
I'm sorry if you are hurt or if we're seeming to have an unfair double standard, but the situations are very different. Of course, we'll have to see what Chev says when he makes his return, but I disagree with you greatly here.
No, this is about rewarding a user that has been banned multiple times(as many times as I have been btw) for getting banned for saying she was going to harm herself and her unborn child, which is deplorable.
The precedent is that the user in question should of been permabanned, because that behavior has been permabanned in the past. I'd be saying this regardless of who the user actually is. The title is also awful.
FTR, I'd 100% reject shockmaster for the reasons that Kublai Khan mentioned.
In post 3554, PJ. wrote:Also anti-nom Queen Shifty, recently banned users probably should get titles. Rewards bad behavior.
This title has nothing to do with being banned though!
Doesn't matter.
Is this because of Shockmaster? Because that wasn't the only reason it was rejected, and it wasn't due to a recent ban, but what was then a current the ban.
This title has nothing to do with a negative behaviour and she is neither currently banned, nor banned often.
I'm sorry if you are hurt or if we're seeming to have an unfair double standard, but the situations are very different. Of course, we'll have to see what Chev says when he makes his return, but I disagree with you greatly here.
No, this is about rewarding a user that has been banned multiple times(as many times as I have been btw) for getting banned for saying she was going to harm herself and her unborn child, which is deplorable.
The precedent is that the user in question should of been permabanned, because that behavior has been permabanned in the past. I'd be saying this regardless of who the user actually is. The title is also awful.
Ok so I'm not going to talk to you caue you don't worth my time and I'm not goint to comment on the title in any manner
Or talk about a previous ban
I'm just going to clarify a digusting accusation - trying as hard as possible to stay calm -
I IN NO MANNER threatehne my self or my child
I said "replace me out before I hurt myself, mu child , she (LLD) and your game" cause BY SATYING in that game - less than a month due to my due day I was harming myself and my child and I was about to harm the other two as well. WAY out of context misrepresenting a mother
How dare you (talking to you all as a community) are accusing a mother with a newborn child that she is capabole of hurting her child?
hurting myself - ok I will ignore you read it that way
But to ask me "what kind of mother I am" when I was banned - and to being repeatedly shamed for this?
I'm Not going to tolerate this anymore. This post is reported and I will report more posts trying to harass me personally.
Thank you all for consideration
Sarah V. Rosell
First, your opening statement is clearly false, because you responded therefore I'm clearly worth your time
@Xlaxe please replace me out before I hurt myself and the baby and this disgusting creature who knows when she should stop pushing me but is still continuing it , and more importantly your game.
Thank you
Go Fucking laugh at your disgusting self in the mirror. laughing at a stupid , miserable , pain worthy , destroyed , depressed , angry coward won't help you get any better.
Bolded is your emphasis, not mine.
There is no discussion to be had on this, your ban isn't going to be re-litigated, but that's what you did. "Replace me or I'm going to harm myself and my child" Despicable.
Last edited by PJ. on Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:55 am, edited 2 times in total.