Blitz 5: Netherspite's Blitz SORM Mafia [Game Over]

[Zymf]

The town may perform up to three lynches during this game day.

3 lynches on day 1 :O - OMG!? This makes massclaiming an even better idea than normally, imo, as we can't possibly make 3 good lynches based solely on reads instead of claims.

You guys should be on someone who didn't claim something, this wagon on me is retarded.

I agree. We should vote for those who haven't claimed first.

I need to finish up my claims list.
Hold up.

Please do - I will vote as soon as you do.

I am Town Government (or random)

[Zymf]

This means all town/neutral roles have been claimed, yay - If the rest of the players want to claim, they have to counterclaim some players ^^

Players who haven't claimed yet:

Hippy Love, Idiot Savant, Ranger, Dwlee99, Kraeg

VOTE: Kraeg (He doubted Fire's approach and used that as an excuse for not claiming)

Okay never mind.. hmm

[Zymf]

One if not both of those neutral benigns need death.

But if Frogger were anti-town, why would he claim neutral to begin with? The fact that he had the gut to claim neutral makes me trust him a bit. The same does not apply to Yreckt though, as he claimed last.

@Idiot Savant: Don't drag previous games into this one please

[Zymf]

I'll just vote for someone who hasn't claimed for now..
VOTE: Ranger

I'll be back later today.

@Kraeg: You didn't say yourself that it was an excuse, I know that. But the fact that you hadn't claimed at that point, makes it possible to make the interpretation that I made. If a mafia is being pressured to claim against his/her will, wouldn't he/she naturally critizise the massclaiming?

[Zymf]

Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.

Well.. ok, if you say so :/
VOTE: Kraeg

But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..

[Zymf]

Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.

Well.. ok, if you say so :/
VOTE: Kraeg

But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..

This is scummy. You don't think it's good to follow him and yet you followed him???

I think it's more scummy to sheep without questioning why. If only I questioned the sheeping, without placing a vote on you, it could be interpreted as an excuse for not wanting to vote for a scumbuddy in the same way as I interpreted your questioning of the massclaim without claiming. Do you understand what I'm getting at?

In a way, being a hypocrite, can make you more town

[Zymf]

I never vote without a reason, even in RVS. You can blame me for being a hypocrite, but don't blame me for explaining my reason..

Don't have time to explain but pls sheep.

Well.. ok, if you say so :/
VOTE: Kraeg

But just because you are a confirmed town, do you really think it's better for us to just follow your lead? I don't necessarily think so..

This is scummy. You don't think it's good to follow him and yet you followed him???

I think it's more scummy to sheep without questioning why. If only I questioned the sheeping, without placing a vote on you, it could be interpreted as an excuse for not wanting to vote for a scumbuddy in the same way as I interpreted your questioning of the massclaim without claiming. Do you understand what I'm getting at?

In a way, being a hypocrite, can make you more town

I don't know if you're deliberately misrepresenting my post or you're just simply dumb. I never criticized the massclaim. What I criticized was Fire being the one who started it while claiming Town Protective. There's a subtle difference between the two.

But there is also some similarity.

[Zymf]

I never vote without a reason, even in RVS. You can blame me for being a hypocrite, but don't blame me for explaining my reason..

I mean, don't blame me for explaining why I have doubt. I haven't yet explained why I still decided to vote for you regardless.

I will do that now:
1) I had allready considered voting for you before Mario told me to. This was, as has been explained, because you critized Fire for suggesting a massclaim when he is himself a protective role.
2) I don't have any reason not to lynch you.
3) I don't want to go against Mario's orders, despite the doubts I have about his method.

[Zymf]

At least one of Aronis or zymf is scum

Is that a fact O.o? And why is it a fact? If it is, I don't mind betting my life that aronis is scum.

[Zymf]

is this a no reveal until all 3 lynches occur? cos that sucks.

Yea.. :/

[Zymf]

Could people please talk nice to eachother instead of insulting one another? And could we please refrain from using gigantic text size every time we get mad?

At least one of Aronis or zymf is scum

Mario - Aronis or Zymf?

Why is it that I am a prime suspect? and why is it that I am pitted against aronis in particular?

I honestly don't care her role right now. No reason not to mass claim with as many claims we have already.

Exactly.

[Zymf]

But if scum!Ranger could take down 2 townies before being revealed as scum, wouldn't it kinda be worth it O.o?

The only reason we have 4 claimed government roles btw, is thanks to the massclaiming, remember that. And if the rest of the players would please claim, then we would get lot's more suspects like me, ranger and aronis. We might even end up with 5 or 6 government roles, which would change the odds from 1/3 to 2/4 or 3/5.

[Zymf]

Please don't lynch me while I'm gone guys, I can confirm my role durring the night if you want.

VOTE: Smithereens (Self-preservation)

[Zymf]

Is it that obvious to tell that I am the crier D:? Oh well, you're correct. I will do as you say and add "I am Zymf" to my cry tonight.

[Zymf]

@Firebringer: Kraeg was town protective, so you should have striked through one of those as well on your list.

I don't see how full claiming helps us much. But those who haven't claimed a slot yet should do so.
VOTE: Hippy Love

[Zymf]

Why not..
VOTE: Dwlee

[Zymf]

VOTE: Idiot Savant

[Zymf]

Easiest win I've had so far

Gg though