[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7391343 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 6: Normal! [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
In post 9, TheLhix wrote:Yes. I suppose I am used to something more conservative and less random or "silly". All in goodness I suppose. Though, I am a sucker for analysis. How are you doing today/night?
Doing fine. It's afternoon here at the moment.
Which brings up another point, for everyone's attention.
(Obviously) I live in an Australian timezone and will frequently be asleep when American and European players are around. This is more of an issue in a blitz than in a usual game, so keep it in mind if you wish to talk with me. I recommend http://xkcd.com/1335/ for keeping track.
In post 168, Titus wrote:
...
you resemble the last mini normal.
Is this referring to NY 190? (Technically a large, but not a big one.) Without really good cause I don't want to read ~130 pages of game to get context for pignash replacing in on page ~120, and I have some reservations about the meta value of such a late replace in any event.
Can you explain the similarity between his play there and here?
Post
Post #234 (isolation #7) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:55 am
Postby Titus »
VOTE: Loha
Aquanum and Yakko would the next pick.
Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
All around, that's pretty bad. If I am right, itepip is almost certainly town.
Post
Post #257 (isolation #11) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 11:08 am
Postby Titus »
The self vote and survival vote come from the same place. Emotional evasion to not get lynched. Ipip is not thinking or playing logically. It's transparent there. Survivalism isn't scummy.
His motivations are clear there. It's the same place I was in during FF7.
Seriously, I just said the blooded five times. I guess I will have to bold and quote until you get it.
Without two wagons, a game is in RVS to me. I read best by relationships.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
[redacted not about me]
VOTE: Titus
[redacted]
Loha was agreeing me about game state, says nothing about me being scummy.
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
In post 289, hi im Yakko wrote:
...
Eh that sounds well reasoned bullshit. I mean I get what you're saying but why would scum titus bring attention to themselves creating a half assed counter wagon? Nah nah I'm thinking titus is town.
If itlepip is scum, or if itlepip is town but there were scum on his wagon already, what would you expect a scum-Titus to do in that situation?
Bear in mind that (IIRC) there were no other wagons of any description active at the time.
Scum Titus would take control of the thread. :-p
You have not played with scum Titus.
Awfully boastful.
I am about my scumgame. Even if town lynches me with guilties, fake or real as scum, my buddies still kick a lot of ass.
My town game has been pretty hot lately if I don't get bothered tunnelling the wrong targets early because people treat me like shit. So yeah.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
Can you explain why you don't find that scummy?
Cuz it's not. You can observe a pattern without asking a question. That's what I do as town.
Questions can easily be used to shape a conversation.
In post 308, Titus wrote:
...
I don't work like that. People start as town. Scummy actions (which ipip has none) do that.
Farside backing off Laho pings like a motherfucker, doubly so because she's voting the counter.
I found these posts by itlepip reflective of scum motivaion because they're pointing suspicion at other players but not really pressuring for more information in any way:
Spoiler:
In post 57, itlepip wrote:Saying that your play was what you thought was normal and therefore not suspicious I find very suspicious.
You have 2 with yakko sheeping you...
Was that vote in or out of RVS, cause I have no idea.
You sound disgusted? Maybe I'm reading that wrong. Any particular reason you pointed it out but made zero attempts to figure out why I was sheeping? I like my vote more now.
i was still in RVS, that was just a comment supposed to be taken lightly. It wasn't meant to be personnel.
Also how would I be able this early in the game to give an explanation of your sheeping, most likely it was just a joking RVS sheep, but if my vote was serious than an RVS vote is bad. You could be scum trying a sheeping strategy early but there isn't much evidence for that. There also could be some scum thing I did early that you guys are reacting to, but I have absolutely no idea what it is.
Can you explain why you don't find that scummy?
Cuz it's not. You can observe a pattern without asking a question. That's what I do as town.
Questions can easily be used to shape a conversation.
Pattern observation gets responses.
I don't think any of those posts were ever likely to result in interesting responses.
That's probably why you don't play that way. What you're highlighting is play style NOT scummy.
Post
Post #345 (isolation #25) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:09 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 342, Aquanim wrote:Whether an unflipped associative read has, in a single game, turned out to be right is not relevant to whether they are a good idea in general.
I am NOT talking about that game here and now, besides to say that I do not intend to let this game become a similar shitshow. If you want to justify your play there do it postgame.
Seriously, I pegged scum and had an all town wagon on scum, what the fuck should I do differently?
I even tried working with people. Got an lol nope.
Post
Post #356 (isolation #28) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:22 pm
Postby Titus »
Farside, really? You go through the hassle to remember my alleged activity level (p.s. I had a bit of work and Saturday game night) but cannot remember I almost never bus as scum?
You are also saying my case is weak and therefore scummy? That's markedly different from how to treat me meta wise.
You're also patently trying vague unknown assoiatives by stating whatever ipip/Laho flip, I'm scum.
That's narrative crafting. Pick a side. You had a scumread on Laho but backed off because my case was weak allegedly.
No, you backed off because the Laho wagon might go through. If you were concerned about my vote, you merely would have unvoted, not vote the major counter wagon.
Post
Post #360 (isolation #30) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:27 pm
Postby Titus »
Yeah you do. You're trying to provoke me into perceived anti-town behavior and avoiding discussing substance. You're trying to avoid discussing your bus vote on Laho. Loha. Whatever.
Farside did plenty of testing the waters before her vote.
You're missing the point. If Farside wants an itlepip lynch today and does not want a LoHa lynch, why would Farside "test the waters" for a LoHa vote?
She settled on itlepip. It wasn't by design. LoHa is scum. Farside distances a bit, and the rumblings pick up. Farside votes later. That buddies me and provides distance. Not expecting it to take off, Farside votes the counter.
Post
Post #396 (isolation #33) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 5:35 pm
Postby Titus »
You're starting from the right point, but seeing the word thing. Look at the word choice. Farside says lazy and weird, not scummy and provides an opportunity to explain. Town might use this to investigate but it functions even better to determine if she can or cannot get on the wagon. If it doesn't catch on, she just takes the position on her buddy being weird.If it catches on, she busses. A town likely votes Loha at 191.
Second, why are you focusing more on Farside when I am pushing for Loha lynch?
In post 396, Titus wrote:You're starting from the right point, but seeing the word thing. Look at the word choice. Farside says lazy and weird, not scummy and provides an opportunity to explain. Town might use this to investigate but it functions even better to determine if she can or cannot get on the wagon. If it doesn't catch on, she just takes the position on her buddy being weird.If it catches on, she busses. A town likely votes Loha at 191.
Second, why are you focusing more on Farside when I am pushing for Loha lynch?
If you have built this whole case on why Farside is scum, why are you not trying to start a farside wagon?
In post 396, Titus wrote:You're starting from the right point, but seeing the word thing. Look at the word choice. Farside says lazy and weird, not scummy and provides an opportunity to explain.
I give people opportunity to explain themselves frequently. Not buying that one.
Town might use this to investigate but it functions even better to determine if she can or cannot get on the wagon.
There IS no wagon at that stage. Why would Farside be trying to work out if she can run a wagon on her buddy, when she could just... not, and sit on her reasonably popular Pip wagon?
A town likely votes Loha at 191.
I didn't vote LoHa based on what was in the thread at 191.
Second, why are you focusing more on Farside when I am pushing for Loha lynch?
Your Farside read makes very little sense and I am trying to work out whether you can possibly believe it as town.
That's why it's called shopping a wagon.
Trying to work it out, or are you the third wheel? I'll figure out soon enough.
Post
Post #402 (isolation #36) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 6:03 pm
Postby Titus »
Again, why so focused on Farside when Loha must be flipped first for any of it to have a point?
Second, if Farside had as much "pull" as you state, why doesn't she say Loha is town? She doesn't. She calls my case weak, but never says he's town when inviting him. She doesn't say he's town when she's paranoid over him.
Post
Post #444 (isolation #40) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 6:14 am
Postby Titus »
@Kop, the agreeing word choice quibble again. Town don't vote someone who they agree with and say nothing else about them. I looked like an easy shot because I was prodded.
Big mistake.
@Kop, Nothing in Pig Nash changed but he's town by PoE.
Post
Post #467 (isolation #41) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 10:56 am
Postby Titus »
In post 465, Aquanim wrote:In the meantime, everyone should explain their votes for LoHa. There's one vote based on LoHa misremembering who said something (Soren), one vote based on an argument that's already been shot down in flames (Titus), one blatant self-preservation vote (itlepip), and three with no explanation at all (TheLhix, Pisskop, Yakko). Whichever of you are townies should be ashamed of yourselves.
: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)
And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.
To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.
He shouldn't vote someone whom the only thing he says is he agrees with me. That's the issue. It's a scumclaim. You're placing a strawman.
: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)
And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.
To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.
He shouldn't vote someone whom the only thing he says is he agrees with me. That's the issue. It's a scumclaim. You're placing a strawman.
I don't see why. My opinion is that you had done very little to advance the thread at that point. If you're aware that it's a problem, but have done next-to-nothing about it, that's pretty scummy.
You mean I kept my post count low til I caught scum is a problem?
Post
Post #633 (isolation #48) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:56 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 626, Malakittens wrote:I mean titus has only interacted with Lhix twice this whole game, both of which doesn't stand out as super scummy or super town.
Just I'm not buying this whole "CW crap" when its pretty damn pbv theres no CW to Loha right now.
Post
Post #636 (isolation #50) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:59 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 635, Malakittens wrote:I wasn't lurking. I was just busy with work, but I haven't been posting much sitewide. You have always in the past called me out for it regardless of whether it was true or not. So the fact you haven't bothers me to no end.
Cuz I knew it was sitewide IRL. Calling you out goes to the void. We're in multiple games.
Post
Post #663 (isolation #52) » Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:03 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 265, Titus wrote:Aqua, Loha had fewer posts than me. He was lurking and prod dodging. He voted me after I suggested a counter to ipip. He provides no reason.
He was chainsawing to get ipip lynched. Pretty obvious to me. Ipip then voting Loha sealed that.
Post
Post #676 (isolation #58) » Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:00 pm
Postby Titus »
Aqua, I said NoS was coaching LoHa telling him to scumhunt. NoS, seeing I perceived that, is highly unlikely to repeat that his buddy needs to post more. It's not about whether the assessment is true but rather him avoiding links.