~OMGUS
VOTE: Ecks Dee
What was bad about the stuff?In post 27, Dunnstral wrote:I was just about to post that all of this stuff was bad and they ignored it to vote knightmare
YesIn post 114, Titus wrote:I think my post chain answers your questions as well.
I count 5 Newbie games in your history on this site. All with 9 player rosters requiring 5 votes to lynch.In post 137, ironstove wrote:as an FYI newbie games I've been in the past normally have somewhere around 11-13 players, this is the first time I've been in one with 9 as a starting roster.
Seems like a good D2 starting point. His "GOOD WORK TOWN" comment struck an odd tone for me as well.In post 157, knightmare wrote:Lynch All Liars?
Why make the comment? To deflect heat?In post 161, Titus wrote:This doesn't seem to be AI or something anyone would lie about.
I don't know that he was referencing off site games. All I know is he's on this site making excuses that are shown to be false with games on this site. Off site experience doesn't matter.In post 163, Titus wrote:referencing off site newbie games
The fact I replied shows you weren't ignored. Posting on phone can allow lag time between posts.In post 167, Titus wrote:You ignored the post you quoted, and even here you are selectively responding.
Why lie? It doesn't do anything.
In post 170, Titus wrote:he gains nothing by lying.
In post 169, havingfitz wrote:I said why. To diffuse negative attention from his naked L-1 vote.
What makes it a sinister conclusion? We're looking for scum...Im looking at ironstove. That's the game. And don't accuse me of not thinking things through because of your failure to grasp conceptsIn post 170, Titus wrote:I don't like you jumping to the sinsiter conclusion without thinking things through.
I'm doing what I've stated I'm doing for the reasons I've stated. Pretty cut and dry.In post 177, Titus wrote:So fitz, you stretching for the reason i think or not?
Why Dunnstal and I vs any other combo?In post 152, knightmare wrote:Would like to see them [Dunnstal] and fitz interact a bit more
I saw that he had logged in since D2 has begun. That's all I've said.In post 189, Titus wrote:@Havingfitz, I haven't seen ironstove posting but he has logged in. You seem to think he has. Do I need to look again?
What about Ecks Dee and knightmare?
Replacement time?In post 202, grapes wrote:Weekends only count 24 hours toward your prod timer, I believe that they're both just outside the range of a prod at the moment.
But I will give them a poke (more of an informal prod) as well since I'm here.
I feel moderately bad about hammering Titus.In post 266, GuiltyLion wrote:let's massclaim, starting with fitz
but when his predecessor ironstove did essentially the same thing D1...and you even call him out for it -In post 288, EchoVision wrote:Last night, I decided to investigate loopdanbecause of his super quick vote within one or two posts of him being here.
Instead of investigating ironstove [or as previously mentioned, the person you'd been voting most of D1 (Dunnstral)] you opt for a player that has made all of 5 posts...for being inactive....which you ALSO call ironstove out for (see quote above).In post 134, EchoVision wrote:ironstove, I'm pretty sure that was your first post. Without reasoning, you just choose to put up a random vote on dave, again with NO REASONING!You haven't been active at all in this, at least not from what I've seen, and your first post, about 3 days into the game, was a random lynch voteputting dave at what I believe is l-1?