Oh this isn't nearly as intimidating as it was on my phone. Thank god, I have to wake up in like 7 hours and was legit worried I would be reading forever lol.
This might sound bad but I don't feel the need to answer everything you posed towards me. If you ask nice I will but yeah. It felt like a lot of nickpicky things that I think in the end we'd see eye to eye on or just agree to disagree. If you want this, i'll do it, clarity is cool. But not tonight lol. This quote was really important for me though:
aronagrundy wrote:A lot of the issues that you and titus have with me are about me saying that I'm suspicious of people and not necessarily voting them. I think it's important to see the context of both of my shaddowez and nn30 vote. With the shaddowez vote, the algebra wagon had just started so I commented on it. It was on my mind. That's all. And then with nn30, I had previously questioned titus on a post that she had made (which was directed toward nn30, funny enough). That's just who I am. I just like putting my thoughts out there, especially in response to how the game's flowing.
PLEASE keep doing this. This was actually huge for me
UNVOTE: aronagrundy. This along with how you've dissected my posts makes me feel like you're legit hunting and not trying to catch a town slipping.
aronagrundy wrote: One more thing, empoof:
Empoof wrote:post 129/130 unvotes shadow and doesn't revote after previously "agreeing with algebra votes", this is odd behaviour. scum.
Why did this come up as scum when you first read it (yes I know you answer your own question about me unvoting later)? I think this only makes me scummy if algebra is scum (unless not revoting after unvoting is a major scumtell). And you didn't think that algebra was scum your first read through.
To me, regardless of alignment of the accused (this would in context be algebra), choosing to not vote someone while holding suspicion of them feels like a cope out. It's really safe for mafians, since if vote=> town, then they weren't on the wagon, and if vote=> scum, it's one less person voting their buddy. So my initial read through that solely in isolation felt scummy. This was one of my red flags on Morning Tweets OneBigPost, but the comfort level in their reads in AnotherBigPost swayed me.
^I answered this one because I think this is the crux of our disagreement.
I can't just say that and not have a vote
VOTE: nn30 since I didn't like their aggressive reaction to algebra's suggestion. It helps that arona isn't off the rails on my scumdar anymore (which was a big deterrent in initially focusing on nn). Will dive into this tomorrow, along with clarity for arona since I'm expecting him to want it.
this reverts the wagons to 3vs3vs2 if i'm reading it right.