[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8338707 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1741 - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
In post 11, algebra wrote:Any no lynches give the town a mathematical disadvantage, bad idea
What's the math on that?
The math isn't exact. If playing purely randomly, we are likely to lynch town. We don't. We play based off our feelings. Lynching is the only tool we have to kill scum, as inefficient as it may be.
We randomly vote until we get a feel for who is scum. Everyone scumhunts in their own way,but we do lynch unless the game hits mylo (where a mislynch loses the game).
We do not hammer (majority vote on a player) without a claim.
Any other questions, feel free to ask. I will be trying to ensure everyone has fun and develops their own technique. I will be honest about the ideal play.
Post
Post #23 (isolation #2) » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:33 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 21, aronagrundy wrote:@Titus: it's a newbie game, plus i didn't see any mafia experience in his post history. Also I'm not sure pushing for a no lynch D1 is really optimum scum strategy, so i don't know what heat you're talking about.
In post 22, nn30 wrote:On day one we don't have anything other than a hello and some bsing to go off of. Those feelings are worthless.
I'm still not seeing how no lynches are bad. *shrug*
if we don't lynch, we don't catch scum. Scum know this and thus favor no lynching. There's also no info to go off of to see who is right, who is wrong, and who should recalibrate.
Post
Post #34 (isolation #7) » Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:05 am
Postby Titus »
In post 31, Morning Tweet wrote:I do not really agree with Titus that a scum newbie would propose a no lynch, but we just started RVS, so it didn't come off as (at least to me) a "nn30 is 100% scum for saying this", as much as "there's possible newbscum motivation behind this suggestion, here's a good vote."
I'm the towniest town the ever towned and you know it, that's why you aren't even accusing me of anything.
You could be like
"ayy this zito guy's pushing bs on me vote: zito"
or
"ayy let's dissect or hell even question this zito guy what's pushing a wagon and got me to L-2 on page 2"
but nah you're just like
"this is fine" #firedog
Wow, there's a self-vouch. There we go.
I have no idea what you're doing, means you should be explaining. You aren't. You aren't generating discussion, as your retreat from the thread shows. If you thought the conversation was important. I actually AM doing option two.
Post
Post #57 (isolation #14) » Mon Sep 19, 2016 9:28 am
Postby Titus »
Hey, algebra, the door is open for you to explain why you're hunting for associations on town? Why do you seem to have a vocabulary that suggests you are not new but a playstyle that suggests you are?
In post 64, aronagrundy wrote:I don't really believe that the vote was random. I voted for titus because I interpreted her post as first acknowledging that nn30's question about new lynches was just a newbie question, and then voting for nn30 as if nn30 legitimately wanted to push a no lynch. It just struck me as odd.
Oh you. I like you.
This is precisely what earned my vote. There's were some screwball mental gymnastics involved with that post and I'd love to hear Titus explain wtf was going on in her headmeat when she made it.
Newbie scum that wanted a no lynch.
That's not mental gymnastics but calling out self preservation when I see it.
Seriously, did you not put together that newbie scum might suggest no lynch because they fear getting lynched?
Shaddowez already answered this but no, it never crossed my mind that someone would fear getting lynched on page freaking 2.
Can you explain how "fear of getting lynched" is specific to newb scum only and not something that'd afflict newb town?
It could be either. I voted to start the sorting process. I wanted to figure out whether the fear was town or scum motivated. The best way to do that was to increase the pressure he feels.
In post 79, Titus wrote:It could be either. I voted to start the sorting process. I wanted to figure out whether the fear was town or scum motivated. The best way to do that was to increase the pressure he feels.
Can you show me where you attempted to do this sorting?
You stated the purpose of that vote was to "start the sorting process." The sorting process would "figure out whether the fear was town or scum motivated."
I'm asking you to show us the sorting process you're referring to.
In post 87, Titus wrote:Asking questions isn't the right tool to use.
The vote increases pressure. The guy fears being lynched. A reasonless vote increases the fear level. It's not about asking questions.
Post
Post #117 (isolation #29) » Tue Sep 20, 2016 11:20 am
Postby Titus »
In post 113, Papa Zito wrote:idc if you're annoyed, I'm not getting what I want. I asked about your process. You said the word "process" I used the word "process" at no point did I ever dig at you about "questions". Where is your process. How does it work. Show me what it was supposed to be doing. You "increased the fear level" gr8 but how the hell does that sort anybody. Is this thing on? ¿Estoy hablando Inglés?
In post 114, Papa Zito wrote:Like this shouldn't be so hard. I'm literally trying to get at what your motivation was on that vote cuz what was posted in-game made 0 sense. It's super easy to understand what I'm trying to get at here and thus (AND THUS) should be super easy to just provide what I'm looking for and move on. Why am I having to drag this shit over multiple pages?
And it shouldn't be that hard for you to understand what I'm saying.
I'm investigating whether he fears a lynch because he's town or scum.
Voting him would help figure that out.
Then I coincidentally get wagoned. He doesn't feel the same fear and the opportunity is gone.
It's because you are not listening that's so frustrating.
Post
Post #123 (isolation #30) » Tue Sep 20, 2016 1:35 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 118, nn30 wrote:So here's where my thoughts are right now. Please chime in if you agree / disagree.
Townie feeling - Dunhallym - entered the game and gave some good analysis on what was going on. This is difficult to do as scum since pretending to do analysis on who is and isn't scum is difficult when you already know the answer.
Townie feeling - Aronagrundy - more of a feeling than anything, but she seems genuine town.
Scummy feeling - Algebra - quick to go along with a lynch vote but isn't offering much in the way of reasoning. Maybe because he knows the people he's putting votes on aren't scum.
Scummy feeling - Titus - five pages in and she won't let go of her scum tell on me. Is it so hard to believe that a newbie would think a no lynch is good?
Scummy feeling - Morning Tweet - post 81 was the tell. Read page three up to post 81. Tweet's analysis comes out of nowhere basically. As I said above it's difficult to do analysis as scum, no?
No reads - everyone else.
Whatever happens, I just want day one to be over. Nothing here is set in stone - I want to see if scum do before I make any concrete conclusions.
Interesting. You
do
seem phased by the fact I suspected you and blind to the fact my vote is now on Algebra. You seem to phrase your own actions as a scumtell, when I never did. Guilty conscience much?
You're no less than the third person who has expressed Algebra is scummy, but has voted elsewhere. If you think that my insistance on wanting you sorted is scummy, how can you have no read on Papa Zito, who is pushing that point. You're also voting him over your scumreads, which makes as much sense as subtlety on me.
Post
Post #125 (isolation #31) » Tue Sep 20, 2016 2:15 pm
Postby Titus »
Great, so according to your own words, we're far out of RVS but you're still joking around?
Also, given your behavior towards my push, my reply details the fact you are phased. That's pretty true. Stop trying to be bigman on campus if you're town. Stop joking around. A joke is ok, but retracting a vote based on its a joke doesn't make any sense. You seem to be doing whatever it is that gets people to like you. Well guess what I like odd balls.
Post
Post #132 (isolation #32) » Wed Sep 21, 2016 3:36 am
Postby Titus »
@Papa Zito, Who said anything complaining about your focus?
A joke is fine. Calling a vote a joke in RVS tends to be scum. If we're in RVS, then nn should act like it's RVS. If he has scumreads, he should sort those.
Yes, nn30 is scared and you are undermining what I am doing. I voted him and later voted algebra. Nn30 still thought my vote was on them and I was only focused on them. If that's not scared aka phased, then your definition needs to change.
Post
Post #168 (isolation #36) » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:27 am
Postby Titus »
Yeah it's probably Grundy and algebra here. Nn30 just fears being lynched as town. Grundy and algebra are inconsistent and scumread each other but vote elsewhere.
@Dun, the very parts you don't like are what suggest Zito is town unless it's overly semantic. To find town, you need to find the process. So Zito wanting to understand mine is not a problem at all. If he plays dumb, then it's a problem.
I think you're the first person in a long while who has said I play a closed cards game. I tend to be quite open and overly blunt.
Post
Post #183 (isolation #39) » Fri Sep 23, 2016 4:06 am
Postby Titus »
In post 181, aronagrundy wrote:@dunn: well, I think a better way to put it is that algebra has been consistently uncooperative, which is a big reason why he's being suspected right now. It just makes me wonder if this is just his playstyle. I think he's anti-town regardless. Contrast this with Titus who I suspect mostly because of repeated gaps in her logic despite being consistent in her style.
@nn30: please explain why algebra's post 172 doesn't make sense.
And this is why Grundy is scum.
The algebra slot is anti-town but Grundy is now townreading it for "reasons"
In post 164, Morning Tweet wrote:@Papa Zito How do you feel about nn30 now? Similarly to how I feel, or is he one of your reads you don't wish to share? (131)
I wouldn't mind seeing him swing at this point. However there's a slot that's yet to chime in with much so I'm in a bit of a holding pattern waiting for that to happen. We've got plenty of time and while I certainly don't advocate using all of it just for the sake of using all of it (that's a fantastic way to kill games) I also don't wanna hit night with a giant unknown in ecane.
Also I feel like at this point I need to do some isodives because this game is surprisingly dense.
How do you feel about Dunn thinking you are nitpicky?
Post
Post #233 (isolation #44) » Sun Sep 25, 2016 10:38 am
Postby Titus »
This is a great group of newbies. Please regardless of your alignment or how algebra flips stick around. Both town and scum IMO are putting up one hell of an effort, I can tell that by the sheer detail I need to read.
Post
Post #251 (isolation #46) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:26 am
Postby Titus »
In post 48, algebra wrote:Titus is at L-1 so we don't want to lynch the slot right now because we should get a good feel on the other players and possibly get some assosicative reads.
Algebra never said preflip associations, he said associative reads. How very semantic of you.
Also, I never backtracked on anything. I knew nn30 was scared but my whole point was to sort him. I literally spent pages on Zito with that.
When Zito pushes you, you randomly dig up old shit based on semantics. What gives?
I might be changing who algebra's partner is soon. This definitely seems like counter wagon shopping.
Post
Post #253 (isolation #47) » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:04 pm
Postby Titus »
Yeah, my very point is that you literally said associative reads and not preflip associations, but that's like saying shoe or footwear. They're synonymous.
In post 242, Papa Zito wrote:Welp. That didn't help as much as I'd hoped it would.
I am no longer interested in lynching nn30 though, I think those voters are on the wrong track. Grundy and Big Poof strike me as bros. Algebra's a mess and I see why he's getting flak but I'm super unsure about what he's doing or why. Tweet needs to post more - Don't Let Your Dreams Be Dreams. Shadow's lack of presence continues to be a major concern. I want to throw Titus through a window regardless of her alignment.
I think that's about where I'm at.
Time to start Doing Stuff I guess I'll start here.
@algebra:
Who would you say are your top 3 scumspects? I don't need reasons just a list is cool.
You forgot me
A few questions for you:
1) you said earlier you had reads but didn't want to share them yet. Why?
2) what were those reads and are they different from the ones you express now that you've reread things ?
Sorry about that. I forgot.
I was looking at the interactions between algebra and Grundy. My worst habit is tunnelling, so I deliberately sat back and waited. We had algebra, no point in trying to force the whole puzzle. Grundy has improved immensely and he responses to my questions were not bad.
Meanwhile, Shaddowez seems to be flailing but in a scummy way. He actually is backtracking on positions in an effort to counter wagon for algebra
Post
Post #273 (isolation #50) » Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:06 pm
Postby Titus »
In post 272, nn30 wrote:@Titus - You're right, bussing could happen. Though I'm assuming that it wouldn't happen on day one. I imagine bussing is good for mid/late game when being on the wagon that turns up a scum gains you some cred among the town. Doing that right now and risking turning the game into 7 vs 1 seems suboptimal.
Agreed. But what if voting your buddy was the only way to save him? All angles need to be considered. Sometimes players are suboptimal.
My biggest moonlogic moments were when I eliminated a suboptimal scenario. You could be right and shadow is town. You'll reach the same result anyway.
Post
Post #287 (isolation #51) » Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:55 am
Postby Titus »
@Shaddowez, Again you reference my "stubbornness" in talking with Zito.
This is important on three fronts. 1) You used it to white knight me when a wagon developed on me. 2) It's not a fair representation of what happened. It's more accurate to say Zito and I were talking past each other. 3) You suddenly acted as if those pages were scummy later, when needing to stop voting algebra.
People picked up on this as well. You're asking me to essentially rehash what others filling in for me. I am not in the mood to rehash.
Your retract your vote on me right after being called on it. This type of sheepish attitude doesn't work for an IC. You are not answering or resolving things.
In post 307, nn30 wrote:I know we're not a 10 person game. I was presenting a scenario in which a day one no lynch holds some merit. Hence - irrelevant aside.
If we were to play a 10 person game, I wouldn't even bring up a no lynch until maybe the last 2 days. That way we played as if we were going to lynch and gained information already. In a 10 person game - assuming lynches never land on scum - a no lynch day one scenario comes with the same number of town lynches as a day one lynch scenario.
Common wisdom around here is to always lynch Day 1 regardless of even/odd number of players. Reason being is Day 1 generates a ton of info with wagons and conversation which you'll lose if you decide to no lynch that day.
I mean, I get that. What if a no lynch day one was only pushed after the wagon had moved around the town and information was gained?
Doesn't work. Wagons are effective pressure because scum don't want to die.
Plus, no lynch pushing after you see who is on the block is AI.