@Ibarra
1. I like playing both Mafia and Town
2. Liars should be lynched unless they have a general statement
3. Depends on how long
DemonHybrid wrote:I would have said the same thing for anyone else if they had accused someone for something first, even you, if the same argument was used against you. I see your point, however misguided it might be.aaah400 wrote:@demonhybrid
hmm ok xD
im keeping my eye on u too
u might be trying to save ibarra since he is mafia and u r too
hmmm... XD we shall see
Also, as an aside for everyone, do not take elite status as consideration for voting someone. For example, don'tnotvote me just because I have more experience, or seem to know what I'm talking about. Anyone could be scum.
i meant few more people yet need to postaaah400 wrote:this forum thing is hard to use D:
im not good with forums yet but ill get used to it i hope
still one person is yet to post
I have to agree with DemonHybrid here. I don't see how commenting first is scummy.aaah400 wrote:usually first people who comment are mafia
Perhaps as a townie you could falsely state that you are a cop in order to confuse the mafia and increase the chance of the mafia making a mistake and killing the townie rather than the cop. It is also likely that the mafia will claim to be a townie to cover their identity rather than a specific job such as a doctor or a cop. The lying from a townie would be especially beneficial if the cop has happened to check the role of the falsely claiming townie before and it would provide the cop a shield while he goes on checking someone else who may be the mafia. But I do see the problem that it could backfire and confuse the town instead, and also the fact that the lying would not work if there is no cop but a doctor instead. I acknowledge this fact and take back what I have said.[/quote]Escho wrote:
hmmm u asked me this. As u said my answers was worded not properly. All I have done was reading old posts and there actions up to this points differs but also seems to me there reactions to these is quite weird to me.Ibaara wrote: *how does asking, what is suspicious about a person, make me mafia? And how is it "covering up for myself*
how is this defeating my own argument? i have said in my answers that reading old posts and the actions currently shall have differed from the previous actions. of course peoples reactions will change if they are accused as they try to escape if they are accused.Ibaara wrote: *How is that suspicious at all? You look for differences in reactions before and after, and point them out. That is scumhunting. You've just defeated your own argument.*
well we should wait and see what other people say as well as your own opiniontylerjarvis wrote:Ok so I saw this one another forum, and I think it's a good question:
Do you think it would be more beneficial to vote for a lynching on the first day and hope that it's a mafia member, or to not have a lynching on the first day, and consider the death tonight an acceptable loss?
.
This is relevant quote made by Escho as mafias will try to escape lynching. Not only he gives relevant informationEscho:Perhaps as a townie you could falsely state that you are a cop in order to confuse the mafia and increase the chance of the mafia making a mistake and killing the townie rather than the cop
He supports his information efficiently and taking all opinions into consideration and deals with it carefully.Escho:Just here, you have compiled what tylerjarvis has previously stated and you are suggesting that he is perhaps lying, and thus should be lynched? From what I understand he has voted just for the sake of voting, and here explains that he has taken no serious consideration to who he has voted for nor much thinking into his voting
Well Ibarra has been repetitively asking me same questions about "how is reading old posts suspicious" not only that he kept tackling me by using the same question over and over and i have answered his questions. Also to me as i mentioned at my old post about how he keeps asking same questions just to make me suspicious of mafia and not himself, this mean that he is making me take the blame of mafia and not himselfaaah400:My vote is on Tylerjavis at the moment as he also switches votes very easily and is being supported by DemonhybridTyler being backed up by demonhybrid may indicate they are both mafia. Mafias will want to help eachother by not getting lynched as more mafias remaining will have easier advantage of winning rather than having one mafia left in the gameCrazyQuestionsAgree on the switches. How is being supported by someone else suspicious??
CrazyQuestions:(Ibarra) How is that a signal of scumminess? Do you consider his attack insincere? Review the reasons for which he attacked you, and tried to see it from a neutral point of view
well thats not very kind :/ just because u had a bad day doesnt mean u vote random people. r u ok now? XDKadersalad wrote:UnVote: CrazyQuestions
I originally voted for Crazy because I was having a bad day......and her posts were annoying me.
.I am defending tyler from crappy attacks and tyler is ATTACKING me instead. You know that means it isn't mutual, but an independent action on my part, right
ok lets answer this question nowIf we were buddying, you did know that town buddies, and far more often than scum does because scum likes to distance themselves from each other, right? Yes, scum buddies too, but not as often as people think.
Why do u swap topics?DemonHybrid wrote:aaah400, what is your thoughts on Kader's play so far? Go into specifics and cite examples, please. One sentence per ISO (Isolated list of posts, done by the "Display posts by user" bar at the bottom of each page) post is fine.
the iso thing. about the parenthesis thing :/aaah400 wrote:can u post it on here because my internet has slowed down :/ finished internet usage :/ only barely managing to post and read :/
well seems to me u swapped topics because u are being put into one spotDemonHybrid wrote:2. I need more information on what you think of Kadersalad. Our argument was going nowhere.aaah400 wrote:
#no.2 y did u swap topics
well this is acceptable as this was his first vote so might as well call it random vote stageKadersalad wrote:Vote: yura-chi, He hasn't posted yet.
i actually agreed with kadersalad at this stage about Tyler on post 16 BUT!Kadersalad wrote: Vote: tylerjarvis for becoming suspicious (Post 16 does show heavy evidence that you were planning on making a Vote. If it was a random vote, then that would contradict post 13 on how you wanted to wait to "Random Vote". However, if it wasn't a random vote, then you must have good reason for voting for me.)
This is his third vote and so soon he vote-hopped. He supported his evidence on Tyler's action of suspiciousness but here he says there is no more point voting tyler after he has supported his evidence. also he voted CrazyQuestions due to long postsKadersalad" wrote: I'm starting to feel like CrazyQuestions is becoming a real hindrance to Investigations, but so far, I do not think "over-analyzing" is enough to make her scum, But Now, I am just using my intuition.
Apparently there is no more point in what I had to say about tyler, so, I am going to UnVote:tylerjarvis and Vote:CrazyQuestions.
Now here is very random. just because he had a bad day, he changed his vote onto crazyquestions? This maybe an excuse trying to escape from being targeted and also he did support his saying by saying he is posting alotUnVote: CrazyQuestions
I originally voted for Crazy because I was having a bad day......and her posts were annoying me.
Yes i do like his vote on demon as i voted him as well but here he changed votes again. Yes I do agree with Kadersalad on how people can change there minds but he does change his vote continuously. This doesn't mean i am targeting Kadersalad at this point well he is suspicious at the moment and also i would like to see explanation of y he has voted demon in the first place.Kadersalad wrote: honestly would like to Vote:DemonHybrid.
do I even need to give a reason now? You have done nothing but to try to make a neverending case against me. First it started out as a Random Vote. Innocent enough, but then it grew and grew. It is like you can not live on unless I die today. You even make it sound like it's just step one, setting up lynches for day 2 even before the first lynch. I have vote hopped(for foolish reasons), but so has tyler. But you must apparently be omniscient, guess you know 100% what I am.
Perhaps you don't want to let it go because you don't want to look like you are "vote hopping". However, people CAN change their minds, and decide to, well, make different desicions.
Well can u show me evidence about this point about how Tyler is THINKING about voting u?DemonHybrid wrote:
tyler is first very unsure about whether he should vote or not. He then votes randomly after I explain that random votes help give us information then switches gears on Crazy. This was after about 4 or 5 sessions of the same question.).
Well i dont like the way u said that. that is just abusing player for no specific reason.Kadersalad wrote:aaah400<<<<<<<<<< I would just call this guy just straight up stupid,Come on, how about you speak properly..