ISO time.
Leeeeets get ready to Ruuuuuuummmbleeee!!!
ISO #0
Says that Melon is a reasonable lynch. First post! And he was just persecuting me for saying I was happy with a lynch. Then he says that the No Lynch is suspicious. Calling for a No Lynch is very common among Newbie Games. It seems that it would work out but really it doesn't.
Scum Tell
ISO#2(Skipping for purpose of the fact that there is basically fluff inbetween)
Votes Melon, with... no...reason... more commonly known as Bandwagonning.
Scum tell
ISO#3-5
Useless fluff
active lurking= Scumtell
ISO#6
My previous post prior to this ISO shows the bandwagon vote that goes here. But he said that Melon was a good lynch. ?
Scum tell
ISO#9
States his vote was a bandwagon. Uhh wut? Then his next reason was just that he looked scummy. See why I said their opinions and scumhunting were flawed?
Scumtell
ISO#10
Says hes not sure about Guide.
unvotes.
scum tell.
ISO#13
Says that his guide vote
Wasn't a contradiction
. Which it was. Then says Robo is Iffy.
scum tell
ISO#15
Acutal Scumhunt. Says Neto is possible scum for questioning awkwardly then says I'm possible scum for explaining why it seems though Neto questions are akward.
I'll be nice and say it was good effort. And first post with content. Good for you.
ISO#17
Decides I'm da scum and votes me.
:roll:I'm getting tired of scum tells.
ISO#19
More scumhunting, says I am odd that I asked Badger why he wasn't voting for me and says that I almost want votes. This is a misintrepretation. I meant that Im OK with votes on me if they hold a reason.
Null but slightly town on this one for read.
ISO#22-24
Puts up an arguement. Which is good. But he is backing it up with extremly weak evidence. Saying that I explained something and that I am odd isn't really concrete evidence. He was going about argumenting correctly but he didn't have the stuff he needed to back it up.
Slightly town for purpose of him going throught it correctly, he actually believed he had me on evidence though.
ISO#27
It was pretty good, except for one thing. He misintrepreted a bunch of stuff that was actually in text.
Attacks me saying Im trying to fit in. When we all know I said trying to fit
it
in. Then he says that day one is not a shot in the dark. If he would have read the post correctly it would have worked. Then finishes it off by responding through my ne post where I asked "You Pick!" and it was lies. He said I was ranting. But look at him so far, does it really look like I was ranting about nothing?
Scum tell, for not even deciding to read the thread and saying he had valid points.
ISO#29
Just says a list of stuff that I supposedly did but really never did. But he did that stuff. I already responded to that post. Tad bit of rolefishing.
Scum tell
ISO #30
Suddenly decides to think about retracting his vote. This post is otherwise known as furious Die hard backpeddling. Its an Olympic sport you know. And he got the Gold. More rolefishing...
Scum tell
ISO#31 32 33
Actual logical scumhunting, the last four posts in the thread right now.
Town tell
I love ISO's for one reason. It brings out FACT rather than Opinion. He really did do all this stuff and it is checkable, referencable facts. This guy has just done way too much for me not to be voting him. I realize now that this would have been the most logical post to do when he was argueing with me.
Questions
will
be answered if you have them and opinions are encouraged.
Tell me what you think.
READ THE WHOLE THING PEOPLE! ESPECIALLY YOU BEEFSTER!