Newbie Game 720 -- Game Over!
-
-
insanepenguin02
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Good questions, Charrat.
1) Need more info
2/3) The only suspicious activity thus far would have to be vamp's comment. It is still rubbing me the wrong way - almost as if you were not only trying to cover your steps for the future but also to try to confuse us a little more in the future. If we know that you "make mistakes" then you're making it so you could be forgiven in the future. I just think that it was an unnecessary comment that really painted a bad picture of you right off the bat. It was a scum move IMO. So if I had to right now, I would probably vote for vamp (Note: not in bold, not official).
4) We need to give it some time to get more info. If we end with not much info in the near future, sure maybe we should no-lynch but if somebody suspicious shows their hand a little, then there would be no reason not to lynch.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Whoa, slow your horses there ben and vamp. I know that it has been explained already and is leading towards votes being cast on vamp right now but I need to interject here:Vamparific wrote:
0.o very good pointsBenmage wrote:
Anywho Ivote insanepenguin02He voted early..than said he wanted to wait for more information before he casted a "real vote". Next he takes back his vote, showing that he really didn't have any interest or knowledge in his first vote... Well what if people had jumped on a bandwagon and Longshanks was lynched...He's seems like a fairly sketchy scummy character to me. As we lack in concrete information I think this may be the best course of action, lest we give the mafia scum free night kills.
insanepenguin02 wrote:Oh, yeah I definitely want to hear a lot more from everyone before I would ever cast areal vote.vote insanepenguin02
1) My first vote was a RANDOM vote as we were in the random voting stage up through at least page 2. Like I actually wanted to vote for longshanks because of his sheep avatar...
2) Therefore, that vote really wasn't arealvote, as I stated. I have been wanting more information in order to make an educated, worthwhile vote.
3) VAMP, you are not making yourself look good at all. For having some experience, why would you jump all over an obvious mistake on ben's part? This added in with your remarks from earlier really makes you look scummy. If you were town, why would you want to vote somebody out so early without any evidence???? This, my friend, is extremely scummy. And now it seems as if you want to be voted....
Therefore, I will cast my vote:Vote: Vamparific-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I don't think that they are a pair. It was just very interesting and shocking that vamp would jump on a vote and agreement with 0 evidence at all,Charrat wrote: 2. While I think that the bandwagon that has formed against Vamp has grown too quickly, I thinkVamp and Benmage have sort-of made themselves into a pair, and that might be the greatest tell we have so far, although a pretty weak one at the moment.especiallyafter his first "scummy" post. Maybe he really does just make a lot of mistakes and acts stupid as he suggested earlier because these are a couple pretty bad moves to make so early.
But I think that vamp would have jumped on ANY vote or accusation in the means to get some attention off of him, no matter who made the claim. In this instance it just ended up being benmage that made the initial accusation, only to retract that accusation later on.
Now, I am not against giving vamp another chance here as the evidence isn't concrete, just INCREDIBLY scummy IMO. But at this stage, that is the only evidence of any kind that we have. I would not argue against anybody that would like to get more info before casting a hammer vote. However, I would also not be against lynching vamp right now as I have stated the reasons before - overall the most summy thus far.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Well, sorry vamp - looks like your comments got ya lynched.
On a sidenote - with this thread being locked after MOD sees the votes, just want to say Happy Holidays!!! Time will be very limited in the next few days for me but I look forward to getting back to this after the next few days! Everyone be safe!-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
It is 5 votes: magisterrain, qwints, t-rex, insanepenguin02, bemage.Vamparific wrote:EBWOP: i only have 4 votes cast against me btw
I voted 4th. How is my vote scummy? I of everyone here has probably the most reason to vote vamp!magisterrain wrote: votes 4 and 5 are looking kinda scummy to me
1) He voted for me so that he had a "reason to vote".
2) I have been building the case on vamp with my FOS from the very beginning.
3) I have fully explained ALL of my reasoning thus far.
So mag, please fill me in on why my vote is "scummy".-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Why would be "damned" if you didn't? There were others that could have voted and you would have only had a non-vote. That wouldn't look too bad. Now, I would agree that you are damned if you did because of the way you are backtracking now.Benmage wrote:with what happened during day one I sorta felt damned if I did and damned if I didn’t.
Why? We would not have thought anything is you wouldn't have voted.Benmage wrote:Had Vamp been mafia, the biggest bullseye ever would’ve been on my chest.
I don't feel that there is anything wrong with hasty decision making. I like a fast moving game also, it keeps my interest. BUT I only act once I have reason and enough evidence to act. Again, you backtracking here is kind of interesting as there really wouldn't have been much interest in your hammer vote at least for a little bit.Benmage wrote:Perhaps I acted to hastily in my decision making.
So you felt compelled to lynch him because there was just one vote left?! I'm confused by this. We could have gotten more info from vamp, had more info brought up about someone else, etc. and didn't NEED to lynch him that quickly. I thought vamp was scum because of the things that he said and when he said them. He felt very scummy IMO so I voted, giving reasoning behind it. For those that didn't give much reasoning but rather bandwagoned, there should be some questions answered as to their motives.Benmage wrote:Your right i did act hastily, my fault.. i guess i feared the association, and the fact that there was onlyone vote left.
In hindsight now it was a bad decision.. had vamp been scum.. well
For you, ben, you need to REALLY clarify why you are trying to backtrack!FOS: benmage.
I have to say that I am with mag here in that you are trying to portray yourself as being innocent and making bad decisions only to backtrack now after the fact. You are looking very scummy but I am not casting a vote just yet in order to get more clarification and more insight from others over the next couple days.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Ben - Thanks for clarifying. I am keeping the FOS on you though for the time being. Reason for that is just the obvious: Backtracking (or call it what you will) is a scum-tell IMO. But, I am not going to read too much into it after my scumdar was flashing insanely on Vamp and he was townie. lol. Overall, I am keeping you on my radar but am entertaining other ideas, thoughts, analyses, etc. to get better reads on everyone else as well.
mag - I agree with all that you said and showed this in my post (115). But voting on this evidence makes me a little more nervous now after what happened with Vamp. I think that we should wait until more people involve themselves in this new day and we get more info from others' posts before voting. Just my opinion.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I would LOVE to hear some thoughts from T-rex, charrat, and qwints
And mag, I am starting to get an odd feeling about you after I just went back and read from page 1 again. You were the first to jump on vamp and ben for their comments on day 1, leading to vamp's lynching on day one. You then were the first to jump on ben for his comments on day 2. It just seems like you are working very quickly to try and form bandwagons without tons of evidence. I guess I am just wanting some clarification if I could to get a better understanding of why you have acted so concretely and quickly.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Ben hasn't really "acted" quickly. He has made some stupid comments, as I have said also, but how is that too quickly to "reevaluate" your position? As you stated, it is almost like we are the only 3 playing so things aren't really going very quickly IMO. Therefore, I still don't see much reasoning behind casting a vote so early without much hard evidence.magisterrain wrote:well i made a mistake with vamp. and benmageacted too quickly for me to reevaluate my position, which, in turn, is why i started getting suspicious of him
Well it all starts somewhere. It may not be a bandwagon just yet but you never know how things will continue. You have been the one giving your reasons and voting first. If its not starting the bandwagoning, then it is damn close.magisterrain wrote:plus, i dont really know how the first person to vote someone can be said to start a bandwagon. i gave my reasons for voting vamp and the 2nd and 3rd and 4th votes are the ones that made it a wagon
You may want to revisit post 99. Thanks!magisterrain wrote:by the way, who put vamp at L-1?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I completely understand the suspicion of benmage (though I guess I wouldn't have voted and haven't). But I want to make it known that I have some suspicion of you as well as it is pretty crazy that you have cast the first votes very quickly. Now, once more info gets out from others, it could very well get even more suspicious about the other votes on vamp, other votes that will result today, etc. Just voicing my opinions since there isn't much going on.magisterrain wrote:ok, so in post 99 you give your reasons for having voted vamp. all i was saying is that your vote nevertheless put him at L-1.
i don't understand how you can accuse me of anything worse than what you did just because i placed the first vote on someone.
and benmage DID act quickly by hammering vamp right after that.
and then acting very suspicious afterward in trying to justify his vote.
seriously, theres no danger of benmage getting lynched right now. i have a vote on him because he has not sufficiently defended himself in my eyes. as soon as he does, i will reevaluate my vote.
MOD: can we have some of the other players here prodded?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Agreemagisterrain wrote:
penguin, i think we are just pretty much at an impasse at the moment until more people return
while consistently voting first on people may indeed be scummy, thats inconclusive until we know who is scum or not.
i misread vamp.
i don't think i'm misreading benmage, but i am wary now that i could be.
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I guess that I was just worried. After you just said this though, that it would be a townie who pushed to lynch another townie, it doesn't make much sense. It happened in another game that I had played though. The town lynched a townie and the one who lead the charge was then killed. Maybe to try and keep the town guessing, I don't know. But thanks for asking and again I was just worried.Charrat wrote:
@insanepenguin
I have a question about a statement you made on day one, after Vamp had received enough votes to be lynched, and before the thread was closed.
I don't understand why the mafia would want to lynch a townie who pushed to lynch another townie. Could you explain to me what you meant?insanepenguin02 wrote:And I suppose that since I was a big player in getting you lynched, if you are a townie, I will probably be the one killed overnight.... If there is a doctor, I could use some help!-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I completely agree, Charrat. I was concerned though, like I stated before, and guess that I really didn't have anything to feel concerned about.Charrat wrote: When I read that yesterday, it thought that it was a little concerning. First, because your reasoning why the mafia would lynch you was strange, and second because it seemed that you might have been drawing the attention of the possible doctor towards yourself, which could be interpreted as a mafia tactic to stop the doctor from saving a townie on Day 1. I am not saying that is what you were doing, but it is a possible motivation.
Still looking for more info from the others that have decided to join in on the fun again!-
-
insanepenguin02
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Sure will: Posts 131, 133, 135. However, I understand that you have responded to many of the accusations though from your actions (not words) I still have a scummy feeling from you.magisterrain wrote:really penguin? can you explain why?
BUT, as I also have stated, I need more information before I can make a better decision. Thus the reason I still have not voted for you.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Now I understand the want to not have the attention on you but do you not see the suspicion that I have of mag? It hasn't just been the nitpicking at you, which makes me think this is all you are seeing (scared?). Why don't you come up with your own cases so that we can have more from you, rather than an opportunity for you to join a wagon or anything. I find it a strange comment to make at this juncture since you haven't made your own case or much analyses yet.Benmage wrote: Also other than the nitpicking at me..anyone have any leads elsewhere?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Mag - I have heard your defense numerous times, no need to keep repeating it. It seems like the more I mention you (even though I didn't attack you), the more you reiterate, and then the more reason I have for staying focused on you. AGAIN - I am waiting for more.magisterrain wrote:fair enough i suppose. though im just not certain i understand why my actions are scummier than anyone else's.
placing the first vote on someone in day 1 is entirely different than placing the first vote on someone in day 2.
but oh well.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
On LongShanks, like you said, the only real comments that he made before being killed was a minor disagreement with benmage back on page 4. Those were his last posts... It's hard to tell from so little information that it is kind of frustrating! Perhaps it was due to disagreeing with a scum, not being active so he was an easy kill... I don't know.Charrat wrote:Does anyone have any theories as to why LongShanks was killed last night? He did not get many posts in before the day ended, and other than a small disagreement with Ben, he did not discuss much with anyone. Maybe he was just a random pick, or maybe he was chosen because he was one of the few players not to vote to lynch Vamp, making him look more townish?
1) Town: If I had to say anybody right now, it would beCharrat wrote:I am going to re-ask the questions I posted on Day 1, give people a chance to answer who didn't, and see who changed their answers and why.
1. At this moment, are there any players that you believe are town? If so, why?
2. At this moment, are there any players that you suspect are mafia? If so, why?.
3. How would you choose who to lynch today if you do not yet have any suspicions of who may be mafia?
4. Would you consider vote for no-lynching today? Why or why not?Charrat. For asking these questions he is trying to get information out into the open, encourage participation, and get people discussing the game and its possibilities. All others are just speculation.
2) Mafia:Mag- for reasons stated earlier; Slight possibility ofbenmagebut for now, I still need to see more from him. I am still surprised at the weird, quick suspicion of me on day 1 that was a little scummy. And lastly I would sayAzhreidue to just a couple comments that he has made in his last few posts:Azhrei wrote:I'm, still here! Sorry, I just forget to check this game sometimes.
Seems to me that he is lurking a little. Making posts here and there just to seem active enough. Also, his answers above are VERY vague and follow the current trend to the t. Me being town is the outlook of just about everyone right now. Ben and mag have been the only ones looked at as being scum. T-Rex has barely even posted, making him an easy SCUM kill. And hardly any real reason to not vote no lynch. Could you explain a little more and provide some analysis please?Azhrei wrote:
1. Nope, except maybe penguin, cos he seems to want to help.
2. Maybe benmage or magis, for the reasons earlier stated, but im not sure.
3. T-Rex, if I had to, cos he's been the mst inactive.
4. Hell no, we needa at least try and get scum.
3) I would not choose anyone right now, reason for my no vote currently. There just isn't enough evidence out there yet.
4) Absolutely not. I want to drag this day out as long as possible and/or needed to get people to discuss in here. If us that are active vote for a no lynch, we are giving the possibly lurking scum the easy kills. So I vote on continuing this until we either get replacements, get people talking, etc.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
t-rex: What do you think about benmage now? Why are you not as active? You stated that you don't understand the ben hate so who would be a person that you would lean towards being scum right now? If you could also answer the questions presented by Charrat again and these questions it would be helpful.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Wow. Weak IMO. You can read into some of these people's posts at least a little bit in order to at least post an opinion on something here. Are you trying to keep in all of your opinions or what? Don't want to give out too much info?Benmage wrote:1.lost
2.lost
3.lost
4. keep the day for sure, i feel if we are unsuccessful today, and without a doctor save or roleblock(if possible) were doomed with a double town deathblow.
i'm really unsure..need more information from all.
Charrat has proposed these questions.. but thats all, more needed from azhrei, qwints and t-rex for sure.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
For everything that you have said and done in these two days of the game, I really have toVote: benmage. You are very much sounding like a noob mafia IMO. From your quick actions at the start of day 2, your hammer vote of vamp, your misunderstanding of random voting (ex: my random vote and qwint's), and now the quick vote on qwints after he offered some evidence and a case against you. (I think I may be missing some info as well but this seems like a good enough list of reasons that I can think of w/out rereading)-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
It is unfortunate that not everyone is participating but hopefully that changes.Benmage wrote: to penguin...lol...i'm sorry but its difficult to keep my composure reading that post.. and its fine, this game is really dragging compared to the fast pace style i'm use to so.. it seems success in this game is not posting(that really sucks)
MOD: Could you prod T-Rex or do you know why he is gone?
I look forward to more info from Azhrei and qwints, know that mag and you will continue posting (unless you die), and hope Charrat continues his activity even more. The game is dragging but as long as we continue being active, there shouldn't be much problem and then we can see who is just lurking.
And do you want to be voted for, ben? What was that last comment for other than telling us how many more votes for you til you die?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Well, it is down to qwints, Charrat, and T-Rex for votes. I am perfectly fine with letting BM hang out to dry, claim, and we all hopefully get more info because of drawing it out.
And also, we need to keep in mind the possible roles that we have in this set-up as well:
So far we have had 2 Normal Townies killed. This leaves two Mafia and five townies of some kind. Any thoughts?Setup:
This game uses the 9-player setup called F11, which consists of four possibilities:
* 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies.
* 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Townies.
* 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Sane Cop, 6 Townies.
* 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Doctor, 6 Townies.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
While we wait, I put together a little voting analysis:
Azhrei: 22 posts total
Post 25: Vote Erato - random? not quite sure...
Post 69: Unvote Erato
Post 73: FOS Vamparific
-end of Day 1 at Post 106-
Post 196: Vote: Benmage
Benmage: 23 posts total (started at Post 70)
Started as Erato from Post 1 - Post 68
(Erato: 3 posts total)
(Post 18: Vote Azhrei - random)
Post 71: Vote IP02
Post 86: Unvote IP02
Post 92: Vote Vamp
-end of Day 1 at Post 106-
Post 183: Vote qwints
Post 190: Unvote qwints and Vote mag
Charrat: 9 posts total
Post 17: Vote IP02 - random
Post 88: Unvote IP02
insanepenguin02: 43 posts total
Post 21: Vote Longshanks - random
Post 22: FOS qwints, FOS Vamp
Post 46: Unvote Longshanks
Post 83: Vote Vamp
-end of Day 1 at Post 106-
Post 115: FOS Benmage
Post 185: Vote Benmage
Longshanks: 6 posts total
Post 30: Vote IP02 - random
Post 47: Unvote IP02
magisterrain: 33 posts total
Post 19: Vote T-Rex - random
Post 45: Unvote T-Rex
Post 65: FOS Vamp
Post 75: Vote Vamp
-end of Day 1 at Post 106-
Post 110: FOS Benmage
Post 112: Vote Benmage
qwints: 9 posts total
Post 16: Vote Vamp - random
Post 26: Unvote Vamp and Vote Azhrei
Post 79: Vote Vamp
-end of Day 1 at Post 106-
Post 182: HOS Benmage
T-Rex: 6 posts total
Post 20: Vote Vamp - random
Post 52: Unvote Vamp
Post 82: Vote Vamp
Vamparific: 14 posts total
Post 72: Vote IP02
Post 78: Unvote IP02-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Day 1
Vamparific:
Voted by:1-qwints, 2-T-Rex,1-mag, 2-qwints, 3-T-Rex, 4-IP02, 5-benmage
insanepenguin02:
Voted by:1-Charrat, 2-Longshanks, 2-Benmage, 3-Vamp
Azhrei:
Voted by:1-Erato, 2-qwints
T-Rex:
Voted by:1-mag
Longshanks:
Voted by:1-IP02
Erato:
Voted by:1-Azhrei
Italics= Later Unvoted
The number means that at that time, that was the number of vote that they cast.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Wow....I have to say that for some reason, I believe you whole-heartedly and I guess we will see if it is a wise move or not.magisterrain wrote:well. here goes.
i don't know if this is the best strategy, but thats why im in the newb forum!
i'm a cop. i investigated benmage on night one and he turned up scum. ( i dont know if he is goon or roleblocker however.) he made it pretty obvious anyway giving me a window in which to pursue him somewhat doggedly.
so, we either have a setup with a cop and a doctor or with just a cop. if there's no doctor, im dead at night and it will be 4-1 townies tomorrow and you have plenty of info from which to pick i think.
if there is a doctor, please try to save me. the roleblocker (if benmage is just a goon) can only block one of us. either i will live without a tell and we will be up 5-1 or the doctor won't be able to save me and i will probably die and we will be at 4-1. 4-1 is our WORST outcome.
hammer benmage and sorry if you dont agree with this move, but im pretty sure it will work.
lets hope there's a doctor and that benmage is a roleblocker, then we would be up 5-1 WITH another investigation result.
This means that we are between two scenarios then:
By hammering and lynching benmage, we will almost surely be able to tell exactly what scenario it is and I think that this would be to the benefit of the town overall. Bold move mag but I think that it should work out IMO.Yaw wrote:- 1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies.
- 2 Mafia Goons, 1 Sane Cop, 6 Townies.
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Well, after the long layoff in the game, I have been thinking:qwints wrote: Who do you two think the other scum is?
I am very suspicious of Charrat - activity level has been actually pretty low after I counted it all up. And the only activity that he seems to be showing is to ask the 4 questions that we have all been answering. IMO this could be a way for scum to get the town's general feelings and act appropriately. Thoughts?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
And so it looks like you're a cop, mag. Being that ben ended up being scum and we haven't had a counter claim, I think it is pretty clear. Also, if there is a doctor in the game, he would still be here as qwints was just vanilla.magisterrain wrote:
i'm a cop. i investigated benmage on night one and he turned up scum. ( i dont know if he is goon or roleblocker however.) he made it pretty obvious anyway giving me a window in which to pursue him somewhat doggedly.
so, we either have a setup with a cop and a doctor or with just a cop. if there's no doctor, im dead at night and it will be 4-1 townies tomorrow and you have plenty of info from which to pick i think.
if there is a doctor, please try to save me. the roleblocker (if benmage is just a goon) can only block one of us. either i will live without a tell and we will be up 5-1 or the doctor won't be able to save me and i will probably die and we will be at 4-1. 4-1 is our WORST outcome.
I would love to hear some things from our replacement and hope that Azhreil, Charrat, and everyone else can chime in here on our new day!-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
With no result, I think that it is comfortable to say that we have a doctor and a roleblocker then.magisterrain wrote:i investigated t-rex and didn't get a result.
i dont know if that means he's innocent or if i got roleblocked however.
is there a doctor? if there is there's a roleblocker. otherwise im pretty sure trex is innocent and there's no doctor.
i think i would have been told he was innocent though, so i think i was roleblocked. they tried to go after the doctor and missed. the doctor protected me probably, but it didnt really matter. id really like to hear from t-rex's replacement right now
Very good analysis, Charrat. This really doesn't help jay out as his predecessor didn't paint a good picture while he was here.Charrat wrote: It is a real shame that T-Rex did not post much more than he did so we would have more to go on. It is interesting that his only post on all of Day 2 was one that came to the defense of Benmage. In fact, in the 6 total posts from T-Rex, he defended Benmage in the last three.He is looking pretty bad in my eyes.I can't wait to get jayfin's opinions on what has happened so far.
Welcome jay! Glad that you are already more active than T-Rex was!jayfin3 wrote:
Anyways, its obvious that we are in this setup:
1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies.
It SHOULD be obvious, anyways.
Anyways, I think we can safely say Mag is town.
That leaves 1 mafia out of:
jayfin3, Azhrei, insanepenguin02, Charrat
1 of us is Doctor. They should NOT claim until necessary, becauese the minute they claim, they can be roleblocked, and the cop killed.
Also, Doctor should be on Cop every night from now on. Dont use WIFOM. Just be on Cop.
So I think we are all in agreement here:
Cop - mag
Mafia Roleblocker and Doctor left as well as two Vanilla Townies.
Now I am getting a gut feeling of something here:
With T-Rex's scummy actions and defenses of Ben, I already have a bad feeling about jay/rex's character. But I have a feeling that jay's first move, after reading how the game had gone, was to roleblock mag, our cop. I do not have any evidence what-so-ever so take this for what it is. I still have a little suspicion of Charrat for posting the questions to gather the town's consensus, my suspicion of Azhrei is dropping as I don't feel that he has toed the line as much as it was made out to be and his defense was pretty sound just now.
SoFOS: jayfin- Thoughts?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
I would also say not to claim yet ONLY because whoever the mafia is will end up claiming to be one of the town roles. So we would end up with, lets say, two doctors. I suppose that we could then figure out who is lying but it might take a day and a possible mis-kill.
However, that is the only reason that I see not to. But I think we could still win even if we did mass claim.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Charrat, I feel comfortable with a vote as well, after hearing his, IMO, failed continued accusations against Azhrei. So:VOTE: jayfin3.
HOWEVER< I must say this:
To mag and Azhrei, you must have some very good reasoning and a case if you choose to hammer jayfin. If you do not and you just choose to hammer, I will be STRONGLY looking into eveyrthing you have said in the past as it will not look very good, no matter what jay comes out to be. I still want there to be some discussion as we still have some time to come to a final decision. So let's take that time.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
As Azhrei has stated, he is a noob, like most of us here so I start just with that. Now a) Azhrei not hammering Vamp looks very much to me that he just wasn't very convinced by the evidence that Vamp was scummy. We all were going off of just a couple things that Vamp said and, in hindsight, was a mistake for us to jump all over the seeminly scummy comments of Vamp. I see Azhrei as being cautious with that. And b) As a noob, I don't know if that would be a great thing for him to do as it may have come across as him trying to get attention off a scum buddy. I see this as also being cautious, not scummy, behavior. So this is number one of my reasons for your "failure" of a case thus far.jayfin3 wrote:Ok, Azhrei you seem to be avoiding my accusation. Maybe I just wasn't clear.
My case against Azhrei is this:
1)He avoided taking the spotlight D1, by either hammering Vampirific, or stalling the lynch on Vampirific, both of which he would have reasons to do:
a)Hammering Vampirific: Azhrei states that his "instincts and my logic tell me he is scum", yet he won't hammer,even though there are 4 votes on Vampirific already, presumabley from people who feel the same way.. I don't understand the hesistation to hammer. it's not rushing the game, everyone has already stated how they feel.
And then,if you still felt like hammering was too quick, why didn't you tell people to back off of Vampirific's lynch?
b)Getting Vamp off of L-1: If you felt so strongly about not rushing the game (which is what you are claiming), why not tell people to back off of Vampirific for the moment?? Clearly, what you are doing here, is avoiding the hammer (and attention), and letting someone else take it. In this case, it was your mafia partner (unlucky)
Maybe it is just me being a noob as well but I really wouldn't see him bussing his only other scum partner so easily. He didn't really bring much attention to it, didn't waiver, and kept the vote there from the beginning. I could see him causing more discussion if he were bussing him IMO. So this is #2 on how I don't think the case against him is working.jayfin3 wrote:2)I know you voted Benmage, it's pretty obvious, and I don't see how I'd overlook that. Obviously i was taking that into account. The thing is, when you posted the post I quoted, it was a bit before you voted Benmage. I think that you figured out that since he was in such deep water, it would be better to vote him. Its called 'bussing', and it makes sense in a scenario such as that.
And #3, you try to build a case which is great. But I have to say that a gut feeling isn't the greatest excuse. I know that I use it and we all have these gut feelings but I can't count it as a GREAT accusation point.jayfin3 wrote:3)Both of your posts that I quoted struck me as being particularly scummy. I don't know, just that gut feeling. For reference, I'm referring to posts 89 and 168.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Alright, I have been fighting this for a while now and think that I need to bring this up while I still can in order to try and get this more settled in my mind before we move forward. Maybe all of this is because I'm a noob, I don't know. First,Unvotebefore somebody may decide that they have been "caught" and hammers jay.
Second, I have to question the information that we have been informed of by the claims that have been made. Here's what we have total:
Players:
Charrat
insanepenguin02, Townie
magisterrain
jayfin3 (replacing T-Rex)
Azhrei
Vamparific*, Townie
LongShanks, Townie
Benmage (replacing Erato), Mafia Goon
qwints*, Townie
Now, we know who has died, 3 townies and 1 MAfia Goon. I know that I am townie so that means 4 townies and 1 Mafia Goon FOR SURE. This still fits every setup situation that we could be in:
Setup:
[*]1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies.
[*]1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Townies.
[*]2 Mafia Goons, 1 Sane Cop, 6 Townies.
[*]2 Mafia Goons, 1 Doctor, 6 Townies.
And the claims that we have had now:
Charrat - N/A
Mag - Cop
jay - Townie
Azhrei - Townie
Now, I don't know if we can wholeheartedly trust mag, sorry. He first announces that he investigated ben on night one and got that he was scum. Sure, that may have happened, or this was bussing. If it was bussing, you of course knew ben was scum as you would be scum as well and wanted to bus him because he was REALLY not doing too well as a scum and you could do better by yourself. Then night 2, you claim that you were roleblocked and got no result which is very fitting if you are scum. And I'm just having problems accepting that you survived night 2 after "claiming cop". Here's why:
If we stick with the set up we are thinking, we have a doctor, cop, and roleblocker left. Why wouldn't the role-blocker have roleblocked one of the other townies and put the hit on mag, so that he could possibly block the doctor and kill the cop?
Thoughts?-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
Agree, because the mafia would not know 100% who the doctor is. I just didn't know if a mafia would take that chance or not.
However, the idea of a counterclaim for the cop DOESN'T necessarily have to happen for mag to be lying. We might not even have a cop. This is yet another piece of the puzzle that could make it impossible for us to pinpoint what scenario we are in at this stage. I believe that the ONLY person that would have a good idea what scenario we are in right now would be the Mafia. If they are a goon, we are likely in this scenario:
[*]2 Mafia Goons, 1 Sane Cop, 6 Townies.
If he is a Roleblocker, we could be in either of these:
[*]1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 1 Sane Cop, 1 Doctor, 5 Townies.
[*]1 Mafia Goon, 1 Mafia Roleblocker, 7 Townies.
That all depends on if mag is correct or not in his claim.
It is just hard to put all of my chips into one person's claim that could be false and easily faked.-
-
insanepenguin02 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 312
- Joined: December 6, 2008
-
-
-