What?Doesn't change the fact that he wasn't scummy. :rolleyes:
Newbie 584: Mark it "done"!
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Wait - this is actually pretty obvious. From my reread on Alabaska I recall a good deal of his forcing the issue that muffin was not the least scummy of the players on day one. Then Alabaska did the fake cop claim thing with Twigs, and then said this:
There's one more reason, though it's not coming to mind at the moment (I'll think of it and post back ASAP), that Twigs is obviously the last scum.Alabaska wrote: WAy to royally screw us Twigs :/-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Ah, here's one of the things that was keeping me from being 100% sure that muffin was town and Twigs was scum.Alabaska wrote: muffin can't be scum; I got an innocent on him. :/
In his cop-claim gambit, alabaska said:
1. He had a guilty on me.
2. He had an innocent on muffin.
I assumed this was just part of his tactic - an attempt to sway muffin to vote with him. It was of course immediately obvious to me that report #1 was fake, which does not mean that report two is fake (since he made both of them up) but you have to consider this, when looking at Alabaska's gambit:
Who was he trying to persuade?
The one thing Alabaska did a really nice job of on Day 3 that I have to give him props for is keeping me wary of both Twigs AND muffin. He didn't make either look totally guilty or innocent. I KNEW he was scum and he did a nice job of tying himself to both muffin and Twigs, and only ever said that he thought Ting and I were the scum pair, which of course makes today's decision very difficult for me. It's tough to discern whether Alabaska was trying to persuade muffin to join him with the innocent report, or if he was using the innocent report to clear muffin and the cop claim to get Twigs on his side. Clearly neither myself nor Ting bought the claim or the reports so his target, in terms of who he wanted to persuade to vote with himself and his scum partner, was clearly either Twigs or muffin. I will think and post back later.-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
-
-
icemanE Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2361
- Joined: March 31, 2008
Thank God for that, heh heh.muffin wrote: There was also a stage where icemane was on L-1 and I had already typed out my vote to put the final vote on. In the end I clicked of it and decided id think about it in 24 hours and that i most definatly dont regret.
Nice job everybody, thanks especially to the IC's, this game is pretty much the reason I know how to play now.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.